oh dear, haven't you lot got over this yet!
Haven't you realised yet, that your wimpering little cries of disapproval mean nothing.
Search found 14 matches
- Fri Jul 13, 2012 8:25 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
- Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:44 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Also, PK said: http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/search.php?author_id=1327&sr=posts 12 posts all pro Buckland Park, except the one about a similar effort in TwoWells, no other involvement in this community. Care to declare your interests? I thinks its a good idea, I already live there, ...
- Thu Feb 04, 2010 9:30 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Congrats Walkers, new town, new roads, new services, no burst water mains every day - where do I sign!!!
- Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:53 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
- Replies: 571
- Views: 210232
2500 home development for Two Wells
Next step in huge Two Wells project By Lauren Parker Council and developers will work together to develop a shared vision for the expansion of Two Wells. District Council of Mallala endorsed a Heads of Agreement between council and Hickinbotham at its meeting on Monday evening, and the organisations...
- Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:05 am
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Just to give those an idea of where the Buckland Park development is proposed to take place relative to the existing urban areas and planned infrastructure, here is a map from the Department of Planning and Local Government: http://www.planning.sa.gov.au/images/dmImage/SourceImage/BucklandParkSiteM...
- Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:38 am
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Would you yourself live in Buckland Park? Is it not ridiculous that they would build a settlement for 33,000 people and yet not ensure there were any transport facilities or shops or other things that we expect near our homes? would i live there, yes I would, yes i do. Tell me, would you run 20 bus...
- Thu May 07, 2009 9:16 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Clearly AtD you are the expert here, and have indisputably more knowlege than the team assembled by Walker Corporation. I wish you well in the future as with your wealth of knowlege will undoubtably land you a planning career earning 6 figure plus annual salaries, but you're probably already doing t...
- Wed May 06, 2009 5:23 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
The EIS expects 50% of all trips within the township to be via walking, bike or public transport in a development of low-density detached homes far from any employment centres, yet mentions nothing on how to achieve this other to mention a single community bus service. It mentions nothing that I co...
- Tue May 05, 2009 9:28 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
I think you people need to read the Impact statement, all of your comments against this proposal have been addressed.
Good work Walker Corp, I hope it all works out.
Good work Walker Corp, I hope it all works out.
- Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:59 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development
The more I read on climate change the more I am convinced that we are now looking at the more the extreme of predicted impacts including rise in sea level. I am wondering at what point government or for that matter insurer’s step in to stop coastal and low lying projects. Or will my kids be payin...
- Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:29 am
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development
Wow, you guys have all the answers! Maybe you should be on the board for fixing the Murray too. ... You clowns probably think that two wells is in the flinders ranges. Are you trolling or just an astroturfer for the Buckland Park developers? Neither, I wrote in and genuinely asked why people are so...
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:11 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development
Wow, you guys have all the answers! Maybe you should be on the board for fixing the Murray too. I had no idea this outback country town development would affect so few so greatly. Sounds like we don't need anymore houses anyway. If they build it, I won't move there, I'll move to two wells, because i...
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:10 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development
A privately set up subdivision in an area where there is currently nothing would have to be cheaper than to buy up existing properties, renew the aging water supply systems and redeveloping, surely. And as for the other, the plans include a medical centre, and school. Public transport exists already...
- Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:06 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
- Replies: 472
- Views: 82394
Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development
Hello everyone. I’m not sure how I stumbled upon this forum or who the people are who are posting in it, but after reading this thread I felt I should say a few words. There are a few people dead against this development, and I can not understand why. I have read articles in the paper and letters ...