Search found 4 matches
- Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:09 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: ONH: [Port Adelaide] Newport Quays | $1.2b
- Replies: 734
- Views: 175470
Re: #U/R: Newport Quays | [ Port Adelaide Waterfront ]
My point concerns the power over public assets and the accountability to the public ....and that is the point! - those assests - being land AND business AND heritage AND trades and tradesmen AND buildings - belong to the public. Not the LMC (Wayne Gibbings), Foley, Conlon, Rann, and even less so to...
- Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:59 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: ONH: [Port Adelaide] Newport Quays | $1.2b
- Replies: 734
- Views: 175470
Re: #U/R: Newport Quays | [ Port Adelaide Waterfront ]
Hmmm - I think the LMC is to be held accountable for many more atrocities accross the state. I just comment on what I am familiar with.
- Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:12 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: ONH: [Port Adelaide] Newport Quays | $1.2b
- Replies: 734
- Views: 175470
Re: #U/R: Newport Quays | [ Port Adelaide Waterfront ]
2/ I find it very hard to believe stumpjumpers comments about the Jenkins Street shipbuilders. I do not know of any business that would close with full order books unless there was another underlying issue. Certainly relocation would not be an issue for a vibrant profitable business. As I mentioned...
- Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:35 pm
- Forum: Metropolitan Development
- Topic: ONH: [Port Adelaide] Newport Quays | $1.2b
- Replies: 734
- Views: 175470
Re: #U/R: Newport Quays | [ Port Adelaide Waterfront ]
A few pointers / comments regarding what I have rea on the last page of this forum: Searles Boatyard was indeed a a vibrant business with full order books. The low rental was passed on to the customers. "Market related" prices is determanined how? The so called low rentals paid by the Jenk...