[COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2776 Post by Wayno » Wed May 22, 2013 7:42 pm

One benefit of driving to an AAMI footy game is the pre-match car park BBQ with beers and many friends. A long-term and low cost cultural tradition for many. Similar is widely done for AO cricket matches, although it's more often a case of cooked chicken, cheese, olives and champagne.

Can't readily do either if you catch PT - carrying gas bottles is probably not encouraged on buses or trains. lol.

Realise you can drop into various city establishments for a feed/drink as an alternative, but the cost will simply be prohibitve for many, especially families.

Maybe there's an opportunity here. Perhaps leverage the surrounding parklands to encourage pre-match picnics. Perhaps setup several free BBQs and Sell BBQ food packs? Anyone have further ideas how to sustain or even expand this pre-match tradition without driving and without needing to pay full tote at a pub or restaurant? Personally I think it's a worthwhile venture.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Matt
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1125
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: London

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2777 Post by Matt » Wed May 22, 2013 8:21 pm

I thought barbecue terraces was a part of the original plan for Adelaide Oval?

A few more coin operated barbecues in the parklands would be great to keep the pre-match BBQ tradition going while encouraging the use of PT.

User avatar
Kasey771
Legendary Member!
Posts: 603
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:56 am

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2778 Post by Kasey771 » Fri May 24, 2013 2:41 pm

Taken Thursday 23 May2013:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.

User avatar
Matt
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1125
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: London

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2779 Post by Matt » Fri May 24, 2013 3:26 pm

Looks like the southern stand is almost ready for the roof sections... exciting.

How's it looking from Memorial Drive?

User avatar
Pants
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1287
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Back Home

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2780 Post by Pants » Sat May 25, 2013 6:44 am

I'm as for development as the next guy on here and voted for this as a SACA member, but I can't help feeling a bit sad about just how much of a concrete monster the Oval's turning into.

Looking at the pics of a soon-to-be cauldron taken as a view from the (reduced, sanitised) hill, really gives an indication of just how far removed this place will be from the beautiful ground it was. I expect to adapt soon enough and accept that progress is a good thing, but I wonder how many people are now thinking about what's been lost here.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3290
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2781 Post by [Shuz] » Sat May 25, 2013 8:50 am

-Yawn-

I can't wait until that stupid Northern mound finally gets built over, and the whole ground is enclosed, like a proper stadium should be.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

ml69
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Adelaide SA

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2782 Post by ml69 » Sat May 25, 2013 8:56 am

Pants wrote:I'm as for development as the next guy on here and voted for this as a SACA member, but I can't help feeling a bit sad about just how much of a concrete monster the Oval's turning into.

Looking at the pics of a soon-to-be cauldron taken as a view from the (reduced, sanitised) hill, really gives an indication of just how far removed this place will be from the beautiful ground it was. I expect to adapt soon enough and accept that progress is a good thing, but I wonder how many people are now thinking about what's been lost here.
Sorry dont feel the same way. I think the way it looks at the moment is kinda like the worst it will look because all you see are huge bare concrete terraces, it won't look so brutal once seats are in and the curved roof forms are in place.

One thing I do miss is the city skyline view from the oval ... but that's the price of progress.

My hope is that the northern end doesn't get redeveloped into another stand. If that happened, then the iconic qualities which make Adelaide Oval special really will be lost. At the moment, I think it's the best balance that it could be.

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2783 Post by claybro » Sat May 25, 2013 10:06 am

ml69 wrote:Sorry dont feel the same way. I think the way it looks at the moment is kinda like the worst it will look because all you see are huge bare concrete terraces, it won't look so brutal once seats are in and the curved roof forms are in place.

One thing I do miss is the city skyline view from the oval ... but that's the price of progress.

My hope is that the northern end doesn't get redeveloped into another stand. If that happened, then the iconic qualities which make Adelaide Oval special really will be lost. At the moment, I think it's the best balance that it could be.
As well as the price of progress, it is also the price of democracy. What is continually overlooked is that at the last state election, there was a very clear choice, between Labor and the upgraded oval, and Lib and a new stadium on the hospital site. In fact, Labor completely derailed the Libs with this concoction of the upgraded oval, somehow they tapped into the very Adelaide mindset of allowing change, but in a compromised form, and won the election. What we have is a compromise. Not a complete stadium, not a picturesque oval, and time will tell how it compares for atmosphere once complete.

cruel_world00
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2784 Post by cruel_world00 » Sat May 25, 2013 4:16 pm

People harping on about views, vibes, complete stadium, concrete overload, price of progress etc... I don't think you realise.... no one gives a rat's about that stuff when going to sporting grounds. There are stadia around the world that have tradition but usually it's because of what happens on the pitch that makes it memorable.

Even Lord's got swept up in Wall-E fever with their redevelopment:
Image

On TV, all those views will be preserved because the cameras will be able to fly around the ground and make it look spectacular, which is probably the most important factor; great advertising for the city of Adelaide with a sporting field in the middle of the city.

The BBQs will still go ahead. Not EVERYONE is going to catch public transport to the ground, similar to every other major event in every city in Australia. But is it a massive loss if the BBQs become a thing of the past? I don't know. What do they actually add to the football experience, particularly if you're not one of those people who participates?

For what it's worth, I think Adelaide Oval is going to be great when completed and will be a thousand times better than that hole at West Lakes and look way better with new stands instead of the poor excuses that were the Chappell temporary looking seating.

I can tell News Limited already have their negative "articles" lined up for the opening rounds and we should expect teething issues with 50,000 punters attending, but that's what happens. They'll iron it out and after a few games it should be smooth sailing.

Bring on 2014.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2785 Post by Wayno » Sat May 25, 2013 4:57 pm

[Shuz] wrote:-Yawn-

I can't wait until that stupid Northern mound finally gets built over, and the whole ground is enclosed, like a proper stadium should be.
Lol. Do you have a track record of retaining friends? anything less than a week doesn't count :lol:
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3290
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2786 Post by [Shuz] » Sat May 25, 2013 8:08 pm

Wayno wrote:
[Shuz] wrote:-Yawn-

I can't wait until that stupid Northern mound finally gets built over, and the whole ground is enclosed, like a proper stadium should be.
Lol. Do you have a track record of retaining friends? anything less than a week doesn't count :lol:
Well, I'm sorry you prefer sticking your head in the sand and ignoring the fact that the stadium once complete, will resemble a giant toilet bowl.

Don't get me wrong, the redevelopment is great. It can just be better if they did away with the northern mound.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3816
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2787 Post by Nathan » Sat May 25, 2013 8:39 pm

[Shuz] wrote: It can just be better if they did away with the northern mound.
100% disagree. The northern mound is what will keep it "Adelaide Oval", and there's no good reason to fill it in. There's so many other things the C shape of stands resembles, but you're obviously fixated on the one the Advertiser peddled.

User avatar
Matt
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1125
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: London

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2788 Post by Matt » Sat May 25, 2013 9:35 pm

So bored of this pathetic "toilet bowl" analogy, particularly when it came from the same arsewipe of a paper that lobbied for it in the first place.

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2789 Post by claybro » Sat May 25, 2013 10:02 pm

Matt wrote:So bored of this pathetic "toilet bowl" analogy, particularly when it came from the same arsewipe of a paper that lobbied for it in the first place.
Hmm, aside from the gushing masses who think this development is somehow paying due diligence to the history of the oval,.. amongst the general football going population out there, is a nagging feeling that the Northern end will somehow detract from atmosphere, and make the stadium feel incomplete. But most were happy with this compromise just to get AFL into the CBD. Leaving the figs and the scoreboard was a giant compromise to the old Adelaide establishment, many of whom are SACCA members, and had the developers not had to contend with this, a much more uniform and functional stadium with more shelter would have resulted.

User avatar
Kasey771
Legendary Member!
Posts: 603
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:56 am

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#2790 Post by Kasey771 » Sun May 26, 2013 8:44 am

[Shuz] wrote:-Yawn-

I can't wait until that stupid Northern mound finally gets built over, and the whole ground is enclosed, like a proper stadium should be.
I would pay good money to be a fly on the wall in Anne Moran's office on the day somebody puts forward a serious proposal for your silly idea. Her head might just explode;)
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 6 guests