Wonder how many jokes they'll make about not having a northern standbretthandorf wrote:had a flight back from Melbourne yesterday and when coming in to land had a good view of the oval. Overheard the person next to me say to their friend/parter/whatever that they can't wait to come over and see a footy match. Good to see that people from interstate are excited as well!
[COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
FFS. Cannot a single positive post go unsullied?Shahkar wrote:Wonder how many jokes they'll make about not having a northern standbretthandorf wrote:had a flight back from Melbourne yesterday and when coming in to land had a good view of the oval. Overheard the person next to me say to their friend/parter/whatever that they can't wait to come over and see a footy match. Good to see that people from interstate are excited as well!
Keep Adelaide Weird
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Jesus, have a sense of humour people I'm picking on some previous posts.
- Port Adelaide Fan
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 1:46 pm
- Contact:
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Adam Hannon from Cox Architects takes us on a tour of Adelaide Oval Redevelopment.
http://www.theplan.net.au/?p=3009
http://www.theplan.net.au/?p=3009
-
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:31 pm
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Great first shot with the panoramic view of the city from the back of the Southern Stand. Undercuts previous opinions on the view being interrupted by that beautiful old red gum(s).Adam Hannon from Cox Architects takes us on a tour of Adelaide Oval Redevelopment.
http://www.theplan.net.au/?p=3009
Cheers,
Chris
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
That is taken from the very top of the stand not the dining room which is a fair bit below that level. Either way it gives a beautiful perspective of our city.
- bretthandorf
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:39 pm
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Looks like theres going to be a mix of teal and red seats. Good to see that they're not going all out teal
Last edited by bretthandorf on Sat Jun 22, 2013 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
I'm glad that they won't all be teal, because I always thought it was ill-suited, but good grief what a colour combination! They obviously haven't got a set aesthetic that they're working towards.
Keep Adelaide Weird
- bretthandorf
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:39 pm
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
http://19thman.com.au/adelaide-oval/adelaide-ovalMatt wrote:Where's that pic from?
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
The colour combination with the seats is pretty good as far as I am concerned.
Could be a lot worse - look at the Gabba for example. Ridiculous,
Could be a lot worse - look at the Gabba for example. Ridiculous,
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
ghs wrote:The colour combination with the seats is pretty good as far as I am concerned.
Could be a lot worse - look at the Gabba for example. Ridiculous.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:07 pm
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
the Gabba would have to the ugliest oval in Australia, simply because of their seat colour choice. Shows how important it is to get it right.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
I think there's a lot more about the Gabba that's ugly myself. Horrible, horrible venue.JamesXander wrote:the Gabba would have to the ugliest oval in Australia, simply because of their seat colour choice. Shows how important it is to get it right.
One big uniform concrete bowl.
So glad that Adelaide Oval is split into three separate and unique stands, rather than one continuous structure.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests