- ImageUploadedByTapatalk1376554902.776290.jpg (169.32 KiB) Viewed 3713 times
[COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Fuck that looks surreal! Absolutely stunning and amazing. Definitely a postcard shot once its all finished.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
I saw this from high up and at a distance today and the copper façade on the southern aspect already looks amazing, especially with sun shining. Can't wait to see it once fully installed.
Keep Adelaide Weird
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Matt,
Thanks for the photo, how good does this look! Can't wait to see it finished.
Thanks for the photo, how good does this look! Can't wait to see it finished.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
That photo looks awesome Matt! Good find!
"SA GOING ALL THE WAY".
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Postcard shots:[Shuz] wrote:Fuck that looks surreal! Absolutely stunning and amazing. Definitely a postcard shot once its all finished.
SYD - bridge & Opera House
MELB - MCG w/ city in back ground or Flinders Street station clock entrance
ADL - the shot above once the whole thing is complete.
Bris - ??
HOB - view of HOB CBD from Mt. Wellington
PER - the view of the CBD from South Perth.
CAN - view of Parliament House from Mt Ainslie w/ War Memorial in foreground.
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Good to see they finally released the dimensions for the new playing surface - 124m x 167m. Narrower but longer than AAMI at 133 x 165.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Nah, I reckon an elevated shot from the other side, with a view into the oval it self, and the CBD as a background will be a better postcard shot.Kasey771 wrote: ADL - the shot above once the whole thing is complete.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Is that truly symmetrical? Previously it was more of a D shape. Even after the Western Grandstand was constructed...sjc wrote:Good to see they finally released the dimensions for the new playing surface - 124m x 167m. Narrower but longer than AAMI at 133 x 165.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
taken from high up in those buildings in North Adelaide on O'CConnell street opposite the Curious Squire? quoting an old AFL advert I'd like to see that:)rev wrote:Nah, I reckon an elevated shot from the other side, with a view into the oval it self, and the CBD as a background will be a better postcard shot.Kasey771 wrote: ADL - the shot above once the whole thing is complete.
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Still no announcement on the missing venue for the Australia - India 4 test series in 2014-15. Vic, NSW, WA and ??? The announcement was due several days ago. Surely Adelaide Oval will get the gig over the Gabba?
I heard the much repeated rumour on Triple M that AO will miss out. Minister, Tom Koutsantonis was vocal in his defence of Adelaide Oval as deserving of a test match. A snub of our magnificent cricket venue by Cricket Australia would be a huge insult and a real loss for cricket fans.
SACA must be working furiously behind the scenes to secure this test but who knows what other influences are at play? AO would attract much higher crowds than the Gabba (which is often subject to rain delays) and the Indians are stated to have a preference for AO. It was mentioned that Cricket Australia seem to favour/reward those that invest less in cricket over those who have invested a lot.
Interestingly, a Triple M listener and current SACA member alluded to the fact that membership renewals are due and some might be waiting to hear the announcement and other decisions being made by Cricket Australia before renewing. Hmmm??
I heard the much repeated rumour on Triple M that AO will miss out. Minister, Tom Koutsantonis was vocal in his defence of Adelaide Oval as deserving of a test match. A snub of our magnificent cricket venue by Cricket Australia would be a huge insult and a real loss for cricket fans.
SACA must be working furiously behind the scenes to secure this test but who knows what other influences are at play? AO would attract much higher crowds than the Gabba (which is often subject to rain delays) and the Indians are stated to have a preference for AO. It was mentioned that Cricket Australia seem to favour/reward those that invest less in cricket over those who have invested a lot.
Interestingly, a Triple M listener and current SACA member alluded to the fact that membership renewals are due and some might be waiting to hear the announcement and other decisions being made by Cricket Australia before renewing. Hmmm??
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Adelaide has the third highest attendance of any Test Match in Australia, without the benefit of a public holiday or Summer school holidays. Per capita we're the best Test match city in Oz. If the 'gabba gets the nod over Adelaide Oval despite the investment shown by the State govt, then there is something else in play that we're not privvy to:(
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2556
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Whilst I'd like to see this test in Adelaide, playing at AO over the Gabba is no less of an insult to residents of Brisbane. It'll be a great ground, but we shouldn't get arrogant in our excitement. If they toss Adelaide out of the mix, that's the organisers loss; not ours.Vee wrote:Still no announcement on the missing venue for the Australia - India 4 test series in 2014-15. Vic, NSW, WA and ??? The announcement was due several days ago. Surely Adelaide Oval will get the gig over the Gabba?
I heard the much repeated rumour on Triple M that AO will miss out. Minister, Tom Koutsantonis was vocal in his defence of Adelaide Oval as deserving of a test match. A snub of our magnificent cricket venue by Cricket Australia would be a huge insult and a real loss for cricket fans.
SACA must be working furiously behind the scenes to secure this test but who knows what other influences are at play? AO would attract much higher crowds than the Gabba (which is often subject to rain delays) and the Indians are stated to have a preference for AO. It was mentioned that Cricket Australia seem to favour/reward those that invest less in cricket over those who have invested a lot.
Interestingly, a Triple M listener and current SACA member alluded to the fact that membership renewals are due and some might be waiting to hear the announcement and other decisions being made by Cricket Australia before renewing. Hmmm??
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Its got nothing to do with arrogance. History shows Adelaideans support Test Cricket in good/great numbers. If CA snub Adelaide for Brisbane it will be a massive FU from CA to Adelaide Cricket fans.Patrick_27 wrote:Whilst I'd like to see this test in Adelaide, playing at AO over the Gabba is no less of an insult to residents of Brisbane. It'll be a great ground, but we shouldn't get arrogant in our excitement. If they toss Adelaide out of the mix, that's the organisers loss; not ours.Vee wrote:Still no announcement on the missing venue for the Australia - India 4 test series in 2014-15. Vic, NSW, WA and ??? The announcement was due several days ago. Surely Adelaide Oval will get the gig over the Gabba?
I heard the much repeated rumour on Triple M that AO will miss out. Minister, Tom Koutsantonis was vocal in his defence of Adelaide Oval as deserving of a test match. A snub of our magnificent cricket venue by Cricket Australia would be a huge insult and a real loss for cricket fans.
SACA must be working furiously behind the scenes to secure this test but who knows what other influences are at play? AO would attract much higher crowds than the Gabba (which is often subject to rain delays) and the Indians are stated to have a preference for AO. It was mentioned that Cricket Australia seem to favour/reward those that invest less in cricket over those who have invested a lot.
Interestingly, a Triple M listener and current SACA member alluded to the fact that membership renewals are due and some might be waiting to hear the announcement and other decisions being made by Cricket Australia before renewing. Hmmm??
Finally, The Summer is the wet season in the tropics. Days of play are regularly lost in games played at the gabba. I cant remember the last time a whole day's play was lost in ADL due to rain.
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
-
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 8:18 am
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Time for this topic to head to the pub?
How's the upgrade going?
How's the upgrade going?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 6 guests