Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
- Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
- Contact:
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
It's a terrible plan. This isn't the 1950's, and the negatives of this kind of sprawl are well known. Unfortunately, I think we have the majority of local councils to blame for this. Rau and the government have been trying to increase heights and density but have been met by extremely un-cooperative councils who prefer to keep the status quo.
By the way, at $1.2b, that's slightly more than what they're investing in Bowden… some priorities are off there.
By the way, at $1.2b, that's slightly more than what they're investing in Bowden… some priorities are off there.
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
It's a simple matter of a financial donation by a developer to the South Australian branch of the ALP. Not only does money talk, but it buys approvals too.Nathan wrote:It's a terrible plan. This isn't the 1950's, and the negatives of this kind of sprawl are well known. Unfortunately, I think we have the majority of local councils to blame for this. Rau and the government have been trying to increase heights and density but have been met by extremely un-cooperative councils who prefer to keep the status quo.
By the way, at $1.2b, that's slightly more than what they're investing in Bowden… some priorities are off there.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:34 am
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
The industry at Port Adelaide should be moved somewhere - but moving it too a country city of 15,000 people which already has a lead smelter, seems like poor planning. Maybe move the fertilizer plant, concrete works and lead smelter to purpose built industrial park with access to a port. Then urban infill can happen at Port Adelaide and if the industrial park was near the iron triangle growth of those cities could also occur.claybro wrote:Could not agree more Shuz! The other day, driving through the back of Port Adelaide it struck me how much vacant land and old warehousing areas are just sitting idle. All of this sitting on already developed infrastructure, such as water, sewerage , rail transport. But we cant develop the port further due to the fertilizer bomb across the river. How about spending some money moving the fertilizer factory and the cement factory to a country port (Port Pirrie)? and get the developers to spend the 1.2 billion in redeveloping the port with thousands of houses, townhouses and apartments. Some SMALL SCALE developments could then also be allowed immediately adjacent to existing country towns such as Roseworthy and Two Wells to help maintain those centres.[Shuz] wrote:Vehemently against this. The urban sprawl has got to stop immediately.
I am learning so much in my urban planning course and one thing that I am picking up on is just how environmentally , socially, and even economically devastating urban sprawl is to communities, biodiversity, agricultural land, social wellbeing, etc.
No to Two Wells, no to Roseworthy, no to Buckland Park, no to Angle Vale, just no, no, no.
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
But it has a world class playground!
Code: Select all
Signature removed
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
Only suggested Pirrie due to its ready made major port, and industrialised workforce. As for the lead smelter, I am not sure the future of this is so certain. I need to also clarify, my intention would not be to move ALL industry from the Port lest it became too sanitised, merely the large, dangerous, polluting explosive plants that pose a risk to any future development.Torrens_5022 wrote:The industry at Port Adelaide should be moved somewhere - but moving it too a country city of 15,000 people which already has a lead smelter, seems like poor planning. Maybe move the fertilizer plant, concrete works and lead smelter to purpose built industrial park with access to a port. Then urban infill can happen at Port Adelaide and if the industrial park was near the iron triangle growth of those cities could also occur.
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
Pretty picture
Last edited by Goodsy on Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
Little boxes, on the hillside, little boxes, made of ticky tacky.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
- Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
- Contact:
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
Almost a perfect re-creation of 1950s suburban planning. All it's missing are the cul-de-sacs.
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
Actually from that artists impression, they look like larger blocks then the regular housing developments.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
Some days I love you, Shuz.[Shuz] wrote:Little boxes, on the hillside, little boxes, made of ticky tacky.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
1200sqm to 1 hectarerev wrote:Actually from that artists impression, they look like larger blocks then the regular housing developments.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 10:05 pm
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
More disgusting, ugly, suburban hell. Two Wells has the power to turn itself into something unique. A small compact, walkable, town - it would attract people from all over for those wishing to escape automobile dependency for something more pleasant.
My blog on urban design: http://www.andrewalexanderprice.com/blog.php
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
Sounds like you want to escape the automobile dependent suburban hell...you moving to Two Wells any time soon?MessiahAndrw wrote:More disgusting, ugly, suburban hell. Two Wells has the power to turn itself into something unique. A small compact, walkable, town - it would attract people from all over for those wishing to escape automobile dependency for something more pleasant.
Maybe we should go back to horse drawn carts, and limit all developments to a single story, if they really need to be above ground, otherwise they absolutely must be underground dwellings with a parkland on top.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs
MessiahAndrw made a good point about suburbia being isolating and car reliant. You offer nothing but hollow hyperbole. What is your point?rev wrote:Sounds like you want to escape the automobile dependent suburban hell...you moving to Two Wells any time soon?MessiahAndrw wrote:More disgusting, ugly, suburban hell. Two Wells has the power to turn itself into something unique. A small compact, walkable, town - it would attract people from all over for those wishing to escape automobile dependency for something more pleasant.
Maybe we should go back to horse drawn carts, and limit all developments to a single story, if they really need to be above ground, otherwise they absolutely must be underground dwellings with a parkland on top.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest