Rev, I know we've had many disagreements, and this is yet another one. But I do need to genuinely ask - are you serious?
Bourke Street Mall is a prime example of exactly why a tram-line should never ever run down a pedestrian mall. The number of times I have seen people so blatantly step out into the path of an oncoming tram, without care, despite all the bells and whistles and signs and visual cues... And this is in a city renowned for its extensive and well publicized tram network. If it can't work there, I have much doubt it will work here.
Unfortunately in Australia, there is still a disconnect between pedestrians, trams, and vehicular traffic. People still perceive them as being three separate entities, and treat them as such, rather than as an integrated whole. Even with the separated tram lines through the city, and with visual treatments applied - raised tracks, signs, the overhead poles, bright coloured trams, still, somehow, everyday, I see cars driving in tram lanes, people walking across the tracks carte blanche, buses, trucks turning out wide right into their path, etc. We have had the extension in place for 8 years now, and people still just don't seem to get it.
It might work in Europe, because of the social culture there and they have over there whereby people actually understand how to use space, and navigate with the trams, rather than against them.
I do agree with you about having the trams to Norwood though - perhaps just better off 1 block south, along Grenfell Street? (Although there's another discussion in itself about the conflict with bus lanes, but I've already steered off-topic enough as is).
Back to Rundle Mall Redevelopment. I love it! Very please with how it's all looking and turning out.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.