Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
jk1237
- Donating Member
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#2251
Post
by jk1237 » Sat Oct 26, 2013 11:26 am
Maximus wrote:rubberman wrote:Ozi, BOTH political parties, and BOTH Federal and State politicians are to blame. It is not possible to blame one party or another for the overall shemozzle that electrification of SA's suburban system has become.
The reasons: ...
Thank you, Rubberman. This is pretty much exactly what I wanted to post this morning, but thinking about politics sometimes makes me feel so apathetic that it's difficult to type! All sides deserve blame for what is increasingly becoming a debacle. Unfortunately, they'd much prefer to sling mud at each other in public, rather than take responsibility for their own failings and work together in a civilised and professional way to generate solutions for the good of the people whom they presume to serve and represent. A pox on all of them!
ok you have a point that a little bit of blame could rest of both sides, but the fact we have a Coalition federal govt claiming that it will spend up big on infrastructure but nothing on urban rail is utterly ridiculous and is something straight out of redneck Alabama where they think that everyone should drive around in a pick-up truck.
Its 2013 FFS
-
AG
- VIP Member
- Posts: 2098
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
- Location: Adelaide SA
#2252
Post
by AG » Sat Oct 26, 2013 3:45 pm
Aidan wrote:The RBA are obsessive about interest rate stability at the expense of everything else. They've been wrecking the economy with unnecessarily high interest rates in an effort to keep the unemployment rate high because they think low unemployment is too inflationary (because the Rudd tax cuts resulted in low unemployment and a jump in inflation, and the RBA confused correlation with causation).
And looking at what's happened to our dollar in the last six years, I can only conclude they're not bothered about currency stability.
The current target policy rate the RBA has currently set is the lowest it has been for decades, it certainly isn't high by any measure. When was the last time the policy rate was 2.5%? The banks, however, have not followed the RBA down as far since they began cutting the rate a few years ago owing to pressures in the banks ability to obtain sufficient funds. This isn't something under the control of the RBA, nor should it be.
What are you implying when you mention "what's happened to our dollar in the last six years"? The AUD/USD on its own is hardly a good measure of currency stability.
-
Aidan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2148
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
- Location: Christies Beach
#2253
Post
by Aidan » Sat Oct 26, 2013 6:05 pm
AG wrote:
The current target policy rate the RBA has currently set is the lowest it has been for decades,
True.
it certainly isn't high by any measure. When was the last time the policy rate was 2.5%?
False - it is high by current international comparison. When we the last time the policy rate in the USA was zero?
The banks, however, have not followed the RBA down as far since they began cutting the rate a few years ago owing to pressures in the banks ability to obtain sufficient funds. This isn't something under the control of the RBA, nor should it be.
If by
this you mean
the interest rates the commercial banks decide to set, I agree with you. But if you mean
pressures in the commercial banks' ability to obtain sufficient funds, I disagree wholeheartedly! Ensuring they don't have any problems with that should be one of the RBA's most important functions.
What are you implying when you mention "what's happened to our dollar in the last six years"? The AUD/USD on its own is hardly a good measure of currency stability.
What currency, or combination of currencies, would you prefer to measure it against?
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.
-
Waewick
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3783
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm
#2254
Post
by Waewick » Sat Oct 26, 2013 8:29 pm
they are obsessive about rates because it is their only tool.
-
claybro
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm
#2255
Post
by claybro » Sat Oct 26, 2013 9:38 pm
jk1237 wrote:ok you have a point that a little bit of blame could rest of both sides, but the fact we have a Coalition federal govt claiming that it will spend up big on infrastructure but nothing on urban rail is utterly ridiculous and is something straight out of redneck Alabama where they think that everyone should drive around in a pick-up truck.
I think the curret state gov have done well to get the electrification this far, given the state of our finances. The electrification and extension of the Seaford line, and electrification of Tonsley have ensured they survive and thrive, and are less likely to be let "run down" under a less PT inclined government. HOWEVER, I do believe the federal government should deal only with federal transport infrastructure and leave the states to capital city public transport. That being said, the Federal Government should then fund ALL of south road from Cross road to the Northern Expy,(the national transport route) and thereby free up some state funds for local issues such as suburban rail, of which the Darlington project could be a part.
-
Torrens_5022
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:34 am
#2256
Post
by Torrens_5022 » Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:36 am
Well said claybro:
The state is responsible for metro rail, but the feds are responsible for the federal roads - the feds have neglected our and most federal roads through out the nation for decades - therefore the state money spent on the federal roads should be given back if they (feds) refuse to contribute to the shared funding on state transport projects. The states spend way too much money on federal roads - the co funding on state infrastructure is therefore is not the feds giving money for state matters - it's a co funding agreement between federal infrastructure (which is neglected by the feds) and the state infrastructure which now is being improved.
The money was promised and half already been given and spent - sounds like a contract, it's not a future agreement - it's a past agreement that already has been processed and initiated - you can't break a contract just because your an arsehole.
-
mattblack
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:20 am
#2257
Post
by mattblack » Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:39 pm
Torrens_5022 wrote:Well said claybro:
you can't break a contract just because your an arsehole.
That's exactly why you break a contract
-
Aidan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2148
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
- Location: Christies Beach
#2258
Post
by Aidan » Sun Oct 27, 2013 6:18 pm
mattblack wrote:Torrens_5022 wrote:Well said claybro:
you can't break a contract just because your an arsehole.
That's exactly why you break a contract
Not quite - exactness would require
your to be changed to
you're.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.
-
EBG
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:49 pm
#2259
Post
by EBG » Sun Oct 27, 2013 11:13 pm
This steel structure is on the east side of the new Wayville station. It must be part of the overhead walkway. It changes shape along its length.
Will have to wait until it is lifted into place.
-
Attachments
-
- wayville 2.jpg (307.84 KiB) Viewed 3579 times
-
- wayville 1.jpg (379.29 KiB) Viewed 3579 times
-
Heardy_101
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:26 am
-
Contact:
#2260
Post
by Heardy_101 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:41 am
I wonder how much that cost to design
www.facebook.com/SARegionalRailAlliance
www.saregionaltrainscampaign.com
-
jk1237
- Donating Member
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#2261
Post
by jk1237 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 9:24 am
Heardy_101 wrote:I wonder how much that cost to design
yes how dare they spend some money on our train system and not all on roads
-
Aidan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2148
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
- Location: Christies Beach
#2262
Post
by Aidan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:46 pm
jk1237 wrote:Heardy_101 wrote:I wonder how much that cost to design
yes how dare they spend some money on our train system and not all on roads
When the money spent on our train system is spent in a way that doesn't benefit passengers, it's a reasonable question. And of course our road system should be subjected to just as much scrutiny.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#2263
Post
by monotonehell » Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:20 pm
Aidan wrote:jk1237 wrote:Heardy_101 wrote:I wonder how much that cost to design
yes how dare they spend some money on our train system and not all on roads
When the money spent on our train system is spent in a way that doesn't benefit passengers, it's a reasonable question. And of course our road system should be subjected to just as much scrutiny.
A little amenity and visual interest not only benefits the passengers, it makes the facility look more appealing so that people will be more willing to use it. Although, this doesn't mean a blank cheque should be issued to an architect.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
crawf
- Donating Member
- Posts: 5521
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#2264
Post
by crawf » Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:23 pm
That walkway is going to be super impressive once it's completed.
-
SAR526
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:59 pm
- Location: Warradale, South Australia.
#2265
Post
by SAR526 » Thu Oct 31, 2013 7:29 pm
The first trains have arrived in Oaklands since the shutdown early this year. Two test trains came through the Goodwood underpass and reversed over the Oaklands crossover to return to the city. I was told by a friendly official on the platform that there may have been a third planned.
The train at about 14.00 consisted of 3007 with 3017 trailing on approach. As they entered the station at quite a respectable velocity with no sign that the track was imposing any restrictions, the Diagonal/Morphett Roads crossing barriers went down, but immediately rose again as soon as the train was stationary.
It would seem that it is intended to open the line to Oaklands as soon as possiblel, if only for electoral reasons. In this case, it may be that the interchange with the Noarlunga Centre/Seaford buses may be moved from the city back to Oaklands with a timetable similar to that which obtained when the first shutdown for the Convention Centre reconstruction work.
“The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye. The more light you shine on it, the more it will contract.”
“Man's mind, once stretched by a new idea, never regains its original dimensions."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 2 guests