[COM] Torrens Footbridge | $40m

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#511 Post by crawf » Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:48 am

Nathan wrote:Only shame is War Memorial Dr being bitumen. Surely they should have paved the 'shared use' area between the plaza and the bridge landing - similar to the middle of Victoria Square or what they're doing on Hindley St West.
Agreed. Though they might do it after the ashes possibly?

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6382
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#512 Post by rev » Thu Dec 05, 2013 1:28 am

AdelaideAlive wrote:I drove past that late tonite and I guarantee there is one section of concrete that hasn't been laid, and have used scaffolding to fill in that section close to memorial drive,i know its trivial but article is not accurate, if someone knows better im happy to be corrected
You know the bridge isn't finished yet.

User avatar
Phantom
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 435
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:49 pm
Location: Northern suburbs

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#513 Post by Phantom » Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:12 pm

If anyone is at the Oval today, I'd love to see how it looks from halfway, looking at the Oval, Convention Centre and also looking towards the area around the intersection of King William and North Tces. If anyone can do this, you'll win 50 internet points. :D
"Mono, you're a knob. <3"

User avatar
Pikey
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2481
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Sitting Down

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#514 Post by Pikey » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:09 pm

I'll try and get those pics tomorrow.

I was amongst the first to cross the footbridge today (didn't realise the opening was on at 7am) so we all got a goodie bag as we crossed.

For all of the whinging and complaining about it being too narrow, well they can shut up. It's fine. In fact it's more than fine. I left my seat on the 3rd level of the Southern Stand at 4:30 and got to my train at 4:42. 12 minutes from the ground to my way home. Straight across the footbridge to the station. Its awesome.

So who wants to stay at AAMI still??
Walking on over....

| Sensational-Adelaide.com Moderator |

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6382
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#515 Post by rev » Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:57 pm

Pikey wrote:I'll try and get those pics tomorrow.

I was amongst the first to cross the footbridge today (didn't realise the opening was on at 7am) so we all got a goodie bag as we crossed.

For all of the whinging and complaining about it being too narrow, well they can shut up. It's fine. In fact it's more than fine. I left my seat on the 3rd level of the Southern Stand at 4:30 and got to my train at 4:42. 12 minutes from the ground to my way home. Straight across the footbridge to the station. Its awesome.

So who wants to stay at AAMI still??
I wonder how many Liberals politicians were in attendance, and how many Crows supporters, given they were the two biggest opponents/naysayers/and or whingers to these developments. I wonder if they've changed their minds now..

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#516 Post by Waewick » Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:16 pm

rev wrote:
Pikey wrote:I'll try and get those pics tomorrow.

I was amongst the first to cross the footbridge today (didn't realise the opening was on at 7am) so we all got a goodie bag as we crossed.

For all of the whinging and complaining about it being too narrow, well they can shut up. It's fine. In fact it's more than fine. I left my seat on the 3rd level of the Southern Stand at 4:30 and got to my train at 4:42. 12 minutes from the ground to my way home. Straight across the footbridge to the station. Its awesome.

So who wants to stay at AAMI still??
I wonder how many Liberals politicians were in attendance, and how many Crows supporters, given they were the two biggest opponents/naysayers/and or whingers to these developments. I wonder if they've changed their minds now..
Is like to call you out for being a knob. But what's the point you are clearly good at it.

I'm a Crows fan and I was for the development.

AdelaideAlive
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:03 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#517 Post by AdelaideAlive » Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:29 pm

walked the bridge twice today, I must say it was awesome, it sort of felt like being in Melbourne for an event, and their was a constant stream of people walking it all day, it certainly is a tourist attraction now.and now I understand why it was so important that they got the entry point correct as their was a buzz around the riverbank area that has never been their before, u would be lucky to get 2 man and a dog in that area previously and with he blue hive and the pop up bars etc etc I only see endless possibilities over the next few years that area will pump at night cant wait bring it on :banana:

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6382
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#518 Post by rev » Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:22 pm

Waewick wrote:
rev wrote:
Pikey wrote:I'll try and get those pics tomorrow.

I was amongst the first to cross the footbridge today (didn't realise the opening was on at 7am) so we all got a goodie bag as we crossed.

For all of the whinging and complaining about it being too narrow, well they can shut up. It's fine. In fact it's more than fine. I left my seat on the 3rd level of the Southern Stand at 4:30 and got to my train at 4:42. 12 minutes from the ground to my way home. Straight across the footbridge to the station. Its awesome.

So who wants to stay at AAMI still??
I wonder how many Liberals politicians were in attendance, and how many Crows supporters, given they were the two biggest opponents/naysayers/and or whingers to these developments. I wonder if they've changed their minds now..
Is like to call you out for being a knob. But what's the point you are clearly good at it.

I'm a Crows fan and I was for the development.
Now I may be a knob according to some people, but I speak the truth. Which not even you can deny.

Fact 1 - Liberals where opposed to the redevelopment and footbridge
Fact 2 - Many Crows supporters wanted to remain at AAMI stadium. The club it self didn't want to make the move away from AAMI to begin with either.
Fact 3 - Only since the redevelopment started have we seen support from the Crows camp

And at the end of the day all I was asking was if those who were vocal in their opposition, had attended and changed their minds given how everyone who attended and was interviewed by the media gave the redevelopment and bridge a big thumbs up. No need to get your panties in a bunch because I mentioned your beloved crows.

PrideofSA
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:30 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#519 Post by PrideofSA » Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:29 pm

You are only speaking of the minority. The majority of crows supporters are all for it. Lets be honest if the Crows weren't happy with the deal then it wouldn't have been redeveloped. They are the biggest sporting club in SA after all.

User avatar
spiller
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:13 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#520 Post by spiller » Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:33 pm

AdelaideAlive wrote:walked the bridge twice today, I must say it was awesome, it sort of felt like being in Melbourne for an event, and their was a constant stream of people walking it all day, it certainly is a tourist attraction now.and now I understand why it was so important that they got the entry point correct as their was a buzz around the riverbank area that has never been their before, u would be lucky to get 2 man and a dog in that area previously and with he blue hive and the pop up bars etc etc I only see endless possibilities over the next few years that area will pump at night cant wait bring it on :banana:
While I disagree that it felt like Melbourne, because IMO that whole area is very unique to Adelaide, there was quite a strange feeling of satisfaction and liveliness to that area for sure. Something i've never experienced there aside from Barrio which is closed off and artificial. Could probably do with some signage at the southern end of the bridge to direct foreigners as there are a few different paths you can take depending on where you want to get to, but its brilliant. Finally feels like a proper city down there.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#521 Post by Waewick » Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:43 pm

I was amongst the first to cross the footbridge today (didn't realise the opening was on at 7am) so we all got a goodie bag as we crossed.

For all of the whinging and complaining about it being too narrow, well they can shut up. It's fine. In fact it's more than fine. I left my seat on the 3rd level of the Southern Stand at 4:30 and got to my train at 4:42. 12 minutes from the ground to my way home. Straight across the footbridge to the station. Its awesome.

So who wants to stay at AAMI still??[/quote]

I wonder how many Liberals politicians were in attendance, and how many Crows supporters, given they were the two biggest opponents/naysayers/and or whingers to these developments. I wonder if they've changed their minds now..[/quote]

Is like to call you out for being a knob. But what's the point you are clearly good at it.

I'm a Crows fan and I was for the development.[/quote]

Now I may be a knob according to some people, but I speak the truth. Which not even you can deny.

Fact 1 - Liberals where opposed to the redevelopment and footbridge
Fact 2 - Many Crows supporters wanted to remain at AAMI stadium. The club it self didn't want to make the move away from AAMI to begin with either.
Fact 3 - Only since the redevelopment started have we seen support from the Crows camp

And at the end of the day all I was asking was if those who were vocal in their opposition, had attended and changed their minds given how everyone who attended and was interviewed by the media gave the redevelopment and bridge a big thumbs up. No need to get your panties in a bunch because I mentioned your beloved crows.[/quote]
No I'm just sick of ignorant knobs talking shit.

1) The Crows were neveragaibst the development. They simply wanted the facts before committing. Like any good business people would.

2) some old Crows fans wanted to stay, funnily enough

A) they were attached to the SANFL and life members of aAAMI or similar so clearly there was attachment and;

B) Form part of a wider community who were also against it.

So I realise simple people like to simplify things to help them process it but can you refrain from doing it here because it's tiresome.

And no you don't speak the truth you use that as a defense when people call you out for trying to pass your opinion off as fact.

I would also suggest the biggest naysayers and people in opposition still would be. Those that believed the money could have been better spend elsewhere.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6382
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#522 Post by rev » Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:36 pm

You seem to have taken offense to my comments about those who were against the development possibly having changed their minds now that they possibly have experienced how good it's going to be first hand. Take a chill pill, it's not like I've had a personal go at you.

You can make all the personal attacks against me you like, but we all know WHY you're having a go at me over my comment..had I not mentioned the crows fans, you wouldn't have even replied to my comment.

You aren't worth worrying about anyway..keep throwing out the personal attacks, it's enjoyable knowing how such a simple innocent comment about the success of the project so far has had such a profound psychological impact on you. I'd have thought, since you think you've got tall the answers to life's questions, you wouldn't be so worried about what such a simple knob like me has to say.

Simple knob signing out.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6382
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#523 Post by rev » Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:44 pm

PrideofSA wrote:You are only speaking of the minority. The majority of crows supporters are all for it. Lets be honest if the Crows weren't happy with the deal then it wouldn't have been redeveloped. They are the biggest sporting club in SA after all.
Port was moving to Adelaide Oval regardless of if the Crows were going to or not. At some stage a redevelopment would have happened of the Chappel and Bradman stands, as it's part of the overall riverbank precinct the government is redeveloping.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#524 Post by Waewick » Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:00 am

rev wrote:
PrideofSA wrote:You are only speaking of the minority. The majority of crows supporters are all for it. Lets be honest if the Crows weren't happy with the deal then it wouldn't have been redeveloped. They are the biggest sporting club in SA after all.
Port was moving to Adelaide Oval regardless of if the Crows were going to or not. At some stage a redevelopment would have happened of the Chappel and Bradman stands, as it's part of the overall riverbank precinct the government is redeveloping.

Port were going nowhere.they had an agreement with the SANFL which had to be honored.

Do your self a favour, stop trying to rewrite history. Especially when you clearly have no idea.
Last edited by Waewick on Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Torrens Footbridge | $40m

#525 Post by Waewick » Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:00 am

rev wrote:
PrideofSA wrote:You are only speaking of the minority. The majority of crows supporters are all for it. Lets be honest if the Crows weren't happy with the deal then it wouldn't have been redeveloped. They are the biggest sporting club in SA after all.
Port was moving to Adelaide Oval regardless of if the Crows were going to or not. At some stage a redevelopment would have happened of the Chappel and Bradman stands, as it's part of the overall riverbank precinct the government is

Port were going nowhere.they had an agreement with the SANFL which had to be honored.

Do Your self a favour, stop trying to rewrite history. Especially when you clearly have no idea.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Mpol02 and 10 guests