[COM] M2 Northern Connector | 15.5km | $867m

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#271 Post by drsmith » Sat Oct 26, 2013 9:40 pm

I'm getting very worried about the prospects for this project.

It seems that like with the Port Wakefield Bypass, I'm talking to myself. That's not an encouraging sign.

Giving this somewhat limp horse a bit more of a flogging, the best option for connecting stage 1 to the Port Wakefield Road might be just north of the service station. This avoids the Bolivar Road/PWR intersection altogether. Allowing only major movements, a 2-phase traffic signal is all that is required for southbound traffic on PWR entering the connector stage 1 (in the same way in which the southbound right turn operates on PWR entering the Sailsbury Highway westbound).

The northbound entry from the connector stage 1 onto PWR could either be free flowing or also have a 2-phase traffic signal depending on local access considerations up to and including the Waterloo Corner intersection.

neoballmon
Legendary Member!
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Morphett Vale

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#272 Post by neoballmon » Sat Oct 26, 2013 11:18 pm

This is key part of making the north-south route non-stop though, so your plan with traffic lights would not work in its favour. Southbound traffic entering the connector would have to be an overpass, and Waterloo Corner road would also need to be grade separated.

But overall, this option would most likely be cheaper than taking the N.C. all the way to NExy.
Looking forward to a free-flowing Adelaide!

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#273 Post by drsmith » Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:27 am

neoballmon wrote:This is key part of making the north-south route non-stop though, so your plan with traffic lights would not work in its favour.
That would come with the second stage in what is now increasingly looking like a 2-stage project.

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#274 Post by drsmith » Sat Dec 14, 2013 1:52 pm

With the SA state election looming early next year, is there a glimmer of hope for this project in the wake of the Holden closure announcement ?
Mr Weatherill yesterday handed Mr Abbott a letter with a list of demands to keep the SA economy from sinking under the weight of the Holden closure.

In the letter, the Premier says cash must pour into the state.

He wants more than $1.1 billion for the Northern Connector and a commitment to future submarine and shipbuilding in SA.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/ho ... 6782038517#

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#275 Post by drsmith » Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:42 pm

The sister project to this in Perth in now funded.

https://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/Buildin ... inkWA.aspx

The state election though in SA draws ever closer.

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#276 Post by drsmith » Tue Jan 21, 2014 4:37 pm

A noise earlier this month from the Federal Government regarding this project and it's not encouraging.
Federal Assistant Infrastructure Minister Jamie Briggs, who on Monday warned against "unedifying scare campaigns" on toll roads, said user charges were a matter for state governments.

He said Canberra would not fund the Northern Connector project without a 50 per cent state contribution, and the project was not a priority for the federal government.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nationa ... 6796867103#

Hooligan
Legendary Member!
Posts: 906
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:03 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#277 Post by Hooligan » Tue Jan 21, 2014 7:39 pm

Is this project a priority though? Maybe the feds are right on this one.

Code: Select all

Signature removed 

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3290
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#278 Post by [Shuz] » Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:17 am

I have to say I agree with the Feds on this one too, it's not a high priority at all. If anything, it's probably the lowest priority of the entire South Road corridor.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Hooligan
Legendary Member!
Posts: 906
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:03 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#279 Post by Hooligan » Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:46 am

I drive along this stretch of Port Wakefield Road (well the bit paralleling it but whatever) daily and I've only had minor issues with traffic and that has only been because of an accident or roadworks up ahead.

The Port River Expressway and Salisbury Highway up until Port Wakefield Road is worse.

Code: Select all

Signature removed 

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6381
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#280 Post by rev » Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:38 am

If they had any common sense they would start multiple sections either end of South Road and work their way to the middle, then once there start the northern connector. Or is todays generation going to be on Viagra before it's all finished? Why must everything be done slowly one thing at a time?
The federal government should have plenty of spare money after the millions they've cut from community programs, the car industry and who knows what else.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3290
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#281 Post by [Shuz] » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:25 am

Just had a dig around for the facts - I've since had a change of mind / opinion.

The Northern Connector is rated by IA (Infrastructure Australia) of having a CBR - cost benefit ratio - of a whopping 8.5. Meaning, that for every $1 invested, there is a return of $8.50. It's valued at $1.1b - economic benefit to the state is therefore estimated at $9.4b. If that's the case, then why the hell are we not progressing with it now?

The state economy is in the doldrums, we'll likely have a Liberal Government soon enough, which will make co-operation between the Feds and State easier - Abbott is fervently pro-roads... am I missing something here? Isn't this the sort of big-policy election announcement the State Liberals should be hooing and haaing about?
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#282 Post by Waewick » Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:52 am

[Shuz] wrote:Just had a dig around for the facts - I've since had a change of mind / opinion.

The Northern Connector is rated by IA (Infrastructure Australia) of having a CBR - cost benefit ratio - of a whopping 8.5. Meaning, that for every $1 invested, there is a return of $8.50. It's valued at $1.1b - economic benefit to the state is therefore estimated at $9.4b. If that's the case, then why the hell are we not progressing with it now?

The state economy is in the doldrums, we'll likely have a Liberal Government soon enough, which will make co-operation between the Feds and State easier - Abbott is fervently pro-roads... am I missing something here? Isn't this the sort of big-policy election announcement the State Liberals should be hooing and haaing about?
I have a feeling that we'll get announcements post election.

typical and inevitable political bullshit

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3290
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#283 Post by [Shuz] » Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:45 am

But why post-election? Why not pre-election? Would that not gain them votes?
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#284 Post by Waewick » Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:47 pm

[Shuz] wrote:But why post-election? Why not pre-election? Would that not gain them votes?
no. because pre-election both parties get the benefit.

Abbott can't come out and say we'll fund the Northern Connector if the libs win.

so he can do it afterwards to both he and the state libs get the kudos (which I hate, no government should get kudos for bloody infrastructure).

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[COM] Re: PRO: Northern Connector | 14km | $1b

#285 Post by drsmith » Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:21 pm

The problem for the Northern Connector politically at least is that it's third in the queue of major South Road projects. The major federal parties were promising funding for only one of either the Torrens or Darlington upgrades at the federal election.

Unless the state can match 50% funding or there's an alternative source of funding, the likelihood is that both of the above projects will have priority above the Northern Connector.
Hooligan wrote:I drive along this stretch of Port Wakefield Road (well the bit paralleling it but whatever) daily and I've only had minor issues with traffic and that has only been because of an accident or roadworks up ahead.

The Port River Expressway and Salisbury Highway up until Port Wakefield Road is worse.
A obvious short term upgrade option would be to widen the Salisbury Highway between South Road and PW Road to 6-lanes. It will be interesting to see how well the existing PW Road and above section of Salisbury Highway cope after the Superway is opened.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: PeFe and 2 guests