[COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
joshyboy
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 12:51 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3871 Post by joshyboy » Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:41 am

Image

Laidback-Luke
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3872 Post by Laidback-Luke » Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:30 am

Check out this absolute stunner from @lee_staple on instagram
Image
footy goals are in!
Hooligan wrote:They should've built a stadium there.

*runs away*

User avatar
Matt
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1125
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: London

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3873 Post by Matt » Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:43 am

Loving the pinks and blues. Looks sensational in pics... can't wait to see it for myself next week!

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3874 Post by Waewick » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:12 am

went down to have a look. All I can say is congratulations to the design team.

The views are spectacular and the bar that faces the city ( I have a photo I'll upload tonight) is quite frankly the best view in town)

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3875 Post by Waewick » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:24 am

Image

User avatar
spiller
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:13 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3876 Post by spiller » Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:15 pm

^^ that bar is fantastic but damn near freezing when its gusty! I agree though, seeing the city poke out from the riverbank is a very unique view.

got my showdown tix today, carn crows.

cruel_world00
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3877 Post by cruel_world00 » Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:38 pm

spiller wrote:^^ that bar is fantastic but damn near freezing when its gusty! I agree though, seeing the city poke out from the riverbank is a very unique view.

got my showdown tix today, carn crows.


The frosty factor is a non-issue for footy as the longest break between quarters is twenty minutes as opposed to the hours you can spend at the bar during a match of cricket.

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3878 Post by jk1237 » Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:12 pm

Also people actually dress in warm clothing during winter. If there is a cool gusty change during summer and your still wearing just shorts, thongs and a t-shirt (ie what happened during the Ashes), of course you will feel cold

obituary resider
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 10:33 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3879 Post by obituary resider » Wed Mar 12, 2014 8:11 pm

When this idea was mooted years ago I thought it was a humongous waste of money and a second rate proposal to the alternative over the old rail yards. Now that it is finished though, I am so very impressed. From the superior viewing angles to the fantastic location and resonating design (without sounding too poetic) it really has been a job well done. Makes you realise how second rate Football Park was as well. I'm not one for talking about local infrastructure and feeling proud, instead I will say that a large proportion of the population is surely gonna get some type of enjoyment from it.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3880 Post by Waewick » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:06 pm

Image

Image

ml69
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Adelaide SA

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3881 Post by ml69 » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:33 pm

Waewick wrote:Image

Image
The view of the playing field is so superior compared to what we used to get at AAMI Stadium it's not funny! We have a lot to be proud about with the new look Adelaide Oval and I foresee the football commentators, local and interstate fans raving about it.

arki
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:35 am

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3882 Post by arki » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:49 pm

Absolutely first rate, no doubt about it.

Too bad Labor won't be in power to oversee all the benefits which will stem from this fantastic development. I bet the Libs will be happy to take all the credit for future developments within the Adelaide CBD in the coming years which no doubt would reference the achievements of the current government as their catalyst.

And to think that the other drongos were opposed and wanted to build a stadium far out at the NRAH site. PATHETIC

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3883 Post by Waewick » Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:07 pm

it is bloody steep that is all I can say. I wouldn't want to sit up there despite the view being absolutely amazing.

in regards to the stadium debate, it is off topic, but having two stadiums will always be an opportunity lost, I am not doubting that this stadium has been done well with the scope provided, but that is not inferring that it was the best choice at the time.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3884 Post by monotonehell » Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:22 am

Waewick wrote:in regards to the stadium debate, it is off topic, but having two stadiums will always be an opportunity lost, I am not doubting that this stadium has been done well with the scope provided, but that is not inferring that it was the best choice at the time.
Having one stadium means having one facility standing unused 80% of the time. Having two would mean two dead areas at twice the cost to maintain. Multi-use stadiums like multi-use buildings are a way to avoid the abandoned/dead urban feel of many cities. I have no doubt that what was done was the correct decision.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

#3885 Post by Waewick » Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:56 am

monotonehell wrote:
Waewick wrote:in regards to the stadium debate, it is off topic, but having two stadiums will always be an opportunity lost, I am not doubting that this stadium has been done well with the scope provided, but that is not inferring that it was the best choice at the time.
Having one stadium means having one facility standing unused 80% of the time. Having two would mean two dead areas at twice the cost to maintain. Multi-use stadiums like multi-use buildings are a way to avoid the abandoned/dead urban feel of many cities. I have no doubt that what was done was the correct decision.
agreed, but it still something we are unlikely to even have a gain (that is two stadiums)

I believe both stadiums could have been filled - the Reds for instance could be filling some time, the improvement of 20/20 has had a clear impact.

but we will never know now....ever.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 4 guests