[COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment
-
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:48 pm
- Location: Adelaide
[COM] U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Check out this absolute stunner from @lee_staple on instagram
footy goals are in!
footy goals are in!
Hooligan wrote:They should've built a stadium there.
*runs away*
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Loving the pinks and blues. Looks sensational in pics... can't wait to see it for myself next week!
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
went down to have a look. All I can say is congratulations to the design team.
The views are spectacular and the bar that faces the city ( I have a photo I'll upload tonight) is quite frankly the best view in town)
The views are spectacular and the bar that faces the city ( I have a photo I'll upload tonight) is quite frankly the best view in town)
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
^^ that bar is fantastic but damn near freezing when its gusty! I agree though, seeing the city poke out from the riverbank is a very unique view.
got my showdown tix today, carn crows.
got my showdown tix today, carn crows.
-
- Donating Member
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
spiller wrote:^^ that bar is fantastic but damn near freezing when its gusty! I agree though, seeing the city poke out from the riverbank is a very unique view.
got my showdown tix today, carn crows.
The frosty factor is a non-issue for footy as the longest break between quarters is twenty minutes as opposed to the hours you can spend at the bar during a match of cricket.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Also people actually dress in warm clothing during winter. If there is a cool gusty change during summer and your still wearing just shorts, thongs and a t-shirt (ie what happened during the Ashes), of course you will feel cold
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 10:33 pm
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
When this idea was mooted years ago I thought it was a humongous waste of money and a second rate proposal to the alternative over the old rail yards. Now that it is finished though, I am so very impressed. From the superior viewing angles to the fantastic location and resonating design (without sounding too poetic) it really has been a job well done. Makes you realise how second rate Football Park was as well. I'm not one for talking about local infrastructure and feeling proud, instead I will say that a large proportion of the population is surely gonna get some type of enjoyment from it.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
The view of the playing field is so superior compared to what we used to get at AAMI Stadium it's not funny! We have a lot to be proud about with the new look Adelaide Oval and I foresee the football commentators, local and interstate fans raving about it.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Absolutely first rate, no doubt about it.
Too bad Labor won't be in power to oversee all the benefits which will stem from this fantastic development. I bet the Libs will be happy to take all the credit for future developments within the Adelaide CBD in the coming years which no doubt would reference the achievements of the current government as their catalyst.
And to think that the other drongos were opposed and wanted to build a stadium far out at the NRAH site. PATHETIC
Too bad Labor won't be in power to oversee all the benefits which will stem from this fantastic development. I bet the Libs will be happy to take all the credit for future developments within the Adelaide CBD in the coming years which no doubt would reference the achievements of the current government as their catalyst.
And to think that the other drongos were opposed and wanted to build a stadium far out at the NRAH site. PATHETIC
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
it is bloody steep that is all I can say. I wouldn't want to sit up there despite the view being absolutely amazing.
in regards to the stadium debate, it is off topic, but having two stadiums will always be an opportunity lost, I am not doubting that this stadium has been done well with the scope provided, but that is not inferring that it was the best choice at the time.
in regards to the stadium debate, it is off topic, but having two stadiums will always be an opportunity lost, I am not doubting that this stadium has been done well with the scope provided, but that is not inferring that it was the best choice at the time.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Having one stadium means having one facility standing unused 80% of the time. Having two would mean two dead areas at twice the cost to maintain. Multi-use stadiums like multi-use buildings are a way to avoid the abandoned/dead urban feel of many cities. I have no doubt that what was done was the correct decision.Waewick wrote:in regards to the stadium debate, it is off topic, but having two stadiums will always be an opportunity lost, I am not doubting that this stadium has been done well with the scope provided, but that is not inferring that it was the best choice at the time.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
agreed, but it still something we are unlikely to even have a gain (that is two stadiums)monotonehell wrote:Having one stadium means having one facility standing unused 80% of the time. Having two would mean two dead areas at twice the cost to maintain. Multi-use stadiums like multi-use buildings are a way to avoid the abandoned/dead urban feel of many cities. I have no doubt that what was done was the correct decision.Waewick wrote:in regards to the stadium debate, it is off topic, but having two stadiums will always be an opportunity lost, I am not doubting that this stadium has been done well with the scope provided, but that is not inferring that it was the best choice at the time.
I believe both stadiums could have been filled - the Reds for instance could be filling some time, the improvement of 20/20 has had a clear impact.
but we will never know now....ever.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: NTRabbit and 8 guests