Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
crawf
- Donating Member
- Posts: 5527
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#706
Post
by crawf » Fri Mar 14, 2014 2:01 am
ml69 wrote:I think something that could be done in the next few years is recladding of the Morphett St bridge with some contemporary panelling (perhaps that material which appears to change colour depending on the sunlight) and also lit up with LED feature lighting at night. I dont think it would be terribly expensive to do.
Agreed.
Morphett St Bridge should be modernised and turned into another riverbank landmark. It could be transformed into a mini suspension bridge, with lighting and a wider footpath including better pedestrian access from the ground level.
Considering we don't have many opportunities to build bridges in SA, I believe it's an idea that should be investigated.
-
TooFar
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:24 am
- Location: A long way from Adelaide
#707
Post
by TooFar » Fri Mar 14, 2014 8:39 am
-
SRW
- Donating Member
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Glenelg
#708
Post
by SRW » Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:26 am
TooFar wrote:
I'm really not a fan of this two-tone paver effect we're seeing lately. It's more successful in the Mall, but here it looks as though they had to rip it up for service works and ran out of matching bricks.
TooFar wrote:
That said, the designers have been absolutely vindicated by the placement and architecture of the bridge. The curvature frames the riverbank beautifully, as TooFar's excellent photos show. Thanks TooFar!
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#709
Post
by monotonehell » Fri Mar 14, 2014 12:03 pm
SRW wrote:I'm really not a fan of this two-tone paver effect we're seeing lately. It's more successful in the Mall, but here it looks as though they had to rip it up for service works and ran out of matching bricks.
Agree. Trying to make an organic pattern with geometric shapes is never going to end well.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
[Shuz]
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
#710
Post
by [Shuz] » Fri Mar 14, 2014 2:30 pm
Got some photos today of AO & footbridge. Will upload when I get home.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
-
pushbutton
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:01 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#711
Post
by pushbutton » Fri Mar 14, 2014 6:55 pm
I walked across it for the first time yesterday.
The paving as you approach (from the Festival Centre end) looks ok (not fantastic, but very respectable) but the paving along most of the bridge looks dirty, drab, and I suppose must have been designed by the same person who designed the new paving in Rundle Mall. It has the same messy, wobbly lines all along it. Looks as if someone scribbled on it!
Other than the paving, great job!
-
Mants
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 990
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:40 am
- Location: City of Burnside
#712
Post
by Mants » Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:19 pm
I honestly thought that the new airport plaza would set a new bar for the quality and style of paving we could expect to see in other public areas around Adelaide and the state.
Alas, this has not been the case. I think the style of paving in Rundle Mall and the Footbridge is mediocre at best. It looks incredibly untidy and mismatched. This seems to be a current trend which I am not a fan of.
-
pushbutton
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:01 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#713
Post
by pushbutton » Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:00 pm
Mants wrote:I honestly thought that the new airport plaza would set a new bar for the quality and style of paving we could expect to see in other public areas around Adelaide and the state.
Alas, this has not been the case. I think the style of paving in Rundle Mall and the Footbridge is mediocre at best. It looks incredibly untidy and mismatched. This seems to be a current trend which I am not a fan of.
I couldn't agree more.
The new airport plaza is aesthetically pleasing, stimulating, modern, clean, pleasant and relaxing. Had Rundle Mall been done in a similar style it would have been fantastic. As for the paving on the bridge, perhaps the airport plaza style isn't necessarily the right style for it, but something equally good could surely have been done.
They pay the designers of these things massive amounts of our money. If dirty looking blocks with (as Mants rightly put it) messy and mismatched colours is really the best those designers could do, they should have paid me to come up with a design. I know very little about how to design paving, but I most definitely could have come up with much better designs for the mall and the footbridge paving, for a tiny fraction of the cost!
-
Kasey771
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:56 am
#714
Post
by Kasey771 » Sat Mar 15, 2014 9:18 am
crawf wrote:ml69 wrote:I think something that could be done in the next few years is recladding of the Morphett St bridge with some contemporary panelling (perhaps that material which appears to change colour depending on the sunlight) and also lit up with LED feature lighting at night. I dont think it would be terribly expensive to do.
Agreed.
Morphett St Bridge should be modernised and turned into another riverbank landmark. It could be transformed into a mini suspension bridge, with lighting and a wider footpath including better pedestrian access from the ground level.
Considering we don't have many opportunities to build bridges in SA, I believe it's an idea that should be investigated.
Many people driving into the city from the North turn off O 'Connell street and come down Jeffcott Street and Montefiore Rd making that bridge a gateway bridge. Eventually I would like to see it snazzied up a bit as described above...good idea.
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
-
Matt
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:36 pm
- Location: London
#715
Post
by Matt » Sun Mar 16, 2014 12:02 am
-
Paulns
- Donating Member
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:55 am
#717
Post
by Paulns » Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:23 pm
"SA GOING ALL THE WAY".
-
Kasey771
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:56 am
#718
Post
by Kasey771 » Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:04 pm
Looks great...
I think the at the Oval end where the majority of pedestrians are going to cross the road should have a raised cobblestone effect..kind of like a really big speed bump. People will be using the bridge on days when it isn't a big event with Police closing WMD.
will slow any traffic down so pedestrians can frogger their way across without needing a traffic light setup.
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
-
how good is he
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am
#719
Post
by how good is he » Sun Mar 23, 2014 12:24 am
It's looking good and am looking forward to the waterfall feature esp. lit up at night... Does anyone know if this and the water feature near the Festival theatre steps will be on 24/7?
My only negative comment is the random lighter colour paving design on the bridge...why?
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#720
Post
by Norman » Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:35 am
I heard it was April or May
Sent from my RM-821_im_mea3_306 using Tapatalk
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 3 guests