News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
I hate to say it, but the O Bahn tunnel will blow out big time. Remember how much it was going to cost to tunnel South Road at Port Road? Now, while one is six lanes and the other is two lanes; sure, the cost won't be the same but $160m is a rather low estimate.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
The cost for those road projects is higher not because of the fact that it was a tunnel, but mainly because of property acquisition.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:34 am
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
The Gawler line is in a high growth corridor while the obahn area has already been developed (eg Greenwith) , Adelaide's north is growing especially around Munno Para (West), Blakeview areas - Gawler and even beyond - The obahn between the city and the track entrance needs to be fixed but increasing Gawler line capacity and frequency is a more urgent issue.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
Nailed it .... 100% agree.Torrens_5022 wrote:The Gawler line is in a high growth corridor while the obahn area has already been developed (eg Greenwith) , Adelaide's north is growing especially around Munno Para (West), Blakeview areas - Gawler and even beyond - The obahn between the city and the track entrance needs to be fixed but increasing Gawler line capacity and frequency is a more urgent issue.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:13 pm
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
What you guys are forgetting is that the remaining Unelectrified lines will gain 22 diesel train consists that will boost the capacity and frequency of these lines.
Last edited by Tonsley213 on Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
This is a point, the cost to electrify the line isn't the only cost to improve frequency. Although I still think electrifying the line is a priority over the OBahn congestion mitigation.Tonsley213 wrote:What you guys are forgetting is that the remaining Unelectrified lines will gain 22 train consists that will boost the capacity and frequency of these lines.
Is it a case of we can do the Obahn thing now, for a return now. But if we electrify the Gawler Line now, we wont improve services much because we still have to wait for delivery of vehicles?
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
How many electric trains are still yet to come?. I still believe it's far more important to modernise an entire major railway line or at least half of it, then shedding a couple minutes for Obahn passengers.
In the meantime the State Government could atleast allocate funds towards sprucing up the stations. The busy Salisbury Interchange for example, is an absolute mess that badly needs a huge overhaul.. As does the whole town centre.
Kilburn is another one that could do with a simple makeover.
In the meantime the State Government could atleast allocate funds towards sprucing up the stations. The busy Salisbury Interchange for example, is an absolute mess that badly needs a huge overhaul.. As does the whole town centre.
Kilburn is another one that could do with a simple makeover.
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
Re: U/C: [Cheltenham] St. Clair | $500m
The western platform of Parafield is being upgraded to match the eastern one.
Bringing our rail network into the present day and out of the 1960s is pivotal if we're going to get more people on public transport. Not an overpriced tunnel that will save four minutes.
Bringing our rail network into the present day and out of the 1960s is pivotal if we're going to get more people on public transport. Not an overpriced tunnel that will save four minutes.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
22 three-car sets were ordered. 6 of them are currently in service, and one set is currently in testing.crawf wrote:How many electric trains are still yet to come?. I still believe it's far more important to modernise an entire major railway line or at least half of it, then shedding a couple minutes for Obahn passengers.
In the meantime the State Government could atleast allocate funds towards sprucing up the stations. The busy Salisbury Interchange for example, is an absolute mess that badly needs a huge overhaul.. As does the whole town centre.
Kilburn is another one that could do with a simple makeover.
On the O-Bahn tunnel, given that the concept plans seem to show the works ending short of the bridge over the Torrens, I don't see how the project is going to achieve a time saving of 4 minutes for O-Bahn passengers, given that they will still have to cross regular traffic in the short stretch that won't be upgraded.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:13 pm
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
4001 is yet to hit service. To my knowledge at least.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
Do you know what the expected timing of all those 22 to be in service is?AG wrote:22 three-car sets were ordered. 6 of them are currently in service, and one set is currently in testing.
Most of the time spent is not at those lights as they have a bus signal* but is spent amongst cars on the Hackney Road and Rundle Road stretch. I can see this working, if it also solves the bottle necking issue at the OBahn's exit.AG wrote:On the O-Bahn tunnel, given that the concept plans seem to show the works ending short of the bridge over the Torrens, I don't see how the project is going to achieve a time saving of 4 minutes for O-Bahn passengers, given that they will still have to cross regular traffic in the short stretch that won't be upgraded.
(* is that like a bat signal?)
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: U/C: [Cheltenham] St. Clair | $500m
I agree that the rail line electrification and upgrading etc of station platforms should be a higher priority than the O-Bahn tunnel investment - to save just 4 minutes off the journey?ChillyPhilly wrote:The western platform of Parafield is being upgraded to match the eastern one.
Bringing our rail network into the present day and out of the 1960s is pivotal if we're going to get more people on public transport. Not an overpriced tunnel that will save four minutes.
It's been great to talk to many fans at the Adelaide Oval who have discovered the convenience of public transport, particularly using the trains to get to and from matches. This is a great opportunity to increase patronage for other journeys.
- SouthAussie94
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Southern Suburbs
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
I think the main reason that the Gawler electrification keeps being delayed is because electrifying the line would render 1/3 of the train fleet unusable; the 2000/2100 class diesel trains can't be run under electric wires because their cabs are too close to the wires.
The O-Bahn is costing $160M. You could probably electrify the Gawler line for this, however you would then need to buy more trains with this greatly increasing the cost.
Once all 22 electric trains are delivered and are operational then the Diesel trains will be able to be cascaded to the other lines and services along these lines will be able to be increased. Electrification is great but it isn't the 'be all, end all'.
Does anyone have a estimate on how much quicker Gawler services would be if the line were to be electrified? Is the time saving more than 4 minutes?
The O-Bahn is costing $160M. You could probably electrify the Gawler line for this, however you would then need to buy more trains with this greatly increasing the cost.
Once all 22 electric trains are delivered and are operational then the Diesel trains will be able to be cascaded to the other lines and services along these lines will be able to be increased. Electrification is great but it isn't the 'be all, end all'.
Does anyone have a estimate on how much quicker Gawler services would be if the line were to be electrified? Is the time saving more than 4 minutes?
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
If having all 22 trains delivered means better diesel services on the other lines I'm not going to complain about the Gawler line not being electrified.
Code: Select all
Signature removed
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
Someone correct me if wrong, but when SA was very healthy financially and things were getting done, the year of 2012 was meant to be the death knell of the 2000s/2100s.SouthAussie94 wrote:I think the main reason that the Gawler electrification keeps being delayed is because electrifying the line would render 1/3 of the train fleet unusable; the 2000/2100 class diesel trains can't be run under electric wires because their cabs are too close to the wires.
Correct. From memory Gawler electrification is somewhere at around $150 million. The trains have already been ordered and paid for as far as I am aware.SouthAussie94 wrote:The O-Bahn is costing $160M. You could probably electrify the Gawler line for this, however you would then need to buy more trains with this greatly increasing the cost.
Speed up services by 20-30 kilometres per hour and you'll see how much time you save. Salisbury to Adelaide (with a stop in between at only Mawson Lakes) could be done in 15 minutes or less. Take an average speed of about 100 km/h. Salisbury to Adelaide is pretty much bang on 20 km. That's around 12 minutes. The patronage would explode.SouthAussie94 wrote:Once all 22 electric trains are delivered and are operational then the Diesel trains will be able to be cascaded to the other lines and services along these lines will be able to be increased. Electrification is great but it isn't the 'be all, end all'.
Does anyone have a estimate on how much quicker Gawler services would be if the line were to be electrified? Is the time saving more than 4 minutes?
Last edited by ChillyPhilly on Mon Jun 23, 2014 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], VinyTapestry849 and 5 guests