Haha I did recently turn 30 so this could be the caseWill wrote:Mate, are you mellowing in your old age?Ben wrote:Never thought I'd say this but I think it's too tall. That is a low rise area of the CBD and think it should stay relatively so. Lots of these buildings add a lot to the streetscape.
I recall a few days ago, you also said that you sympathised with the Adelaide Parklands Preservation Association.
[PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 68m | 21 Levels | Mixed Use
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 13-20 East Terrace | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
You are my favourite now.Phantom wrote:This building won't get built, because this says otherwise.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
I'm pretty sure 292-300 is the location of the Old East end markets that closed in the 80s. It includes the buildings on the front that have san churo, oyster bar but the proposal might include keeping them.
You can see the building through the alleyway between oyster bar and PJs.
You can see the building through the alleyway between oyster bar and PJs.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
Correct - it's that whole corner including the two empty shops on Rundle (formerly the sushi place and inconvenienced store) right around to the oyster bar, including the shared car parking out the back. It's not a deep parcel, so I hope the design can be setback nicely so it doesn't loom too much on the street scape. Height and Rundle Street's character can co-exist if done well.Capac wrote:I'm pretty sure 292-300 is the location of the Old East end markets that closed in the 80s. It includes the buildings on the front that have san churo, oyster bar but the proposal might include keeping them.
You can see the building through the alleyway between oyster bar and PJs.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
Certain ACC folk will go apoplectic when the DAC approves...
Phantom, I laughed out loud with your 'otherwise' line. well done.
Phantom, I laughed out loud with your 'otherwise' line. well done.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
- wilkiebarkid
- Donating Member
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Adelaide
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
This could easily be our first MERITON SERVICED APARTMENT building. They are everywhere interstate. We stayed in one in Sydney recently.
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
Love you too, babe.monotonehell wrote:You are my favourite now.Phantom wrote:This building won't get built, because this says otherwise.
Glad I could be of assistance somehow.Wayno wrote:Certain ACC folk will go apoplectic when the DAC approves...
Phantom, I laughed out loud with your 'otherwise' line. well done.
"Mono, you're a knob. <3"
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
As far as I am aware there is no indication Meriton will be entering the SA market. Hope I'm wrong though.wilkiebarkid wrote:This could easily be our first MERITON SERVICED APARTMENT building. They are everywhere interstate. We stayed in one in Sydney recently.
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
This seems to have disappeared from the DPTI website.
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 23 Levels | Mixed Use
Hopefully they found a site more appropriate, This part of Adelaide should remain a more heritage focused area.
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 79m | 23 Levels | Mixed U
This one is going before the DAC this Thursday which they are recommending is REFUSED. I'm sure this will come out in the papers in next few days.
Some details: 79m, 23 Levels, 81 apartments. The East Terrace facades are staying as a podium. Not sure about the green and glue glass. Why cant we have architecturally nice buildings proposed! At least its not a box!
Some details: 79m, 23 Levels, 81 apartments. The East Terrace facades are staying as a podium. Not sure about the green and glue glass. Why cant we have architecturally nice buildings proposed! At least its not a box!
- Attachments
-
- rundle7.JPG (45.17 KiB) Viewed 8515 times
-
- rundle6.JPG (42.2 KiB) Viewed 8515 times
-
- rundle4.JPG (54.77 KiB) Viewed 8515 times
-
- rundle3.JPG (39.16 KiB) Viewed 8515 times
-
- Rundle2.JPG (39 KiB) Viewed 8515 times
-
- Rundle1.JPG (40.32 KiB) Viewed 8515 times
-
- Rundle.JPG (44.48 KiB) Viewed 8515 times
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 79m | 23 Levels | Mixed U
Interesting to note the original proposal was around 90m high and looked much better then the current in my opinion.
- Attachments
-
- rundleorig.JPG (276.37 KiB) Viewed 8503 times
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 79m | 23 Levels | Mixed U
They should leave Rundle Street low-rise in my opinion. Otherwise it will lose its unique character with the historical buildings.
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 79m | 23 Levels | Mixed U
It's pretty stark and looks... interesting. I'd still approve it though. I think we need (as a city) to realise that due to PAN-OPs etc our 'talls' will need to gravitate to the traditionally low rise eastern part of the city. I know many of the city's population would prefer these be concentrated in the more industrial western side of the CBD but we're already pushing maximum heights over there with many of the new developments. I think like Bohem it would stand out for a few years before presumably being joined by some other buildings of similar heights making them a bit more congruent with their surroundings.
[PRO] Re: [PRO] 292-300 Rundle Street | 79m | 23 Levels | Mixed U
To be honest i prefer this one. Its very rare we get any high rises in Adelaide that have anything other than a rectangular floor plan, so im all for it. I think the height and design is well suited to the area. The flowing organic nature of the floor plates lends itself to the parklands in my opinion.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 5 guests