You’ve taken my comment out of context. Yes this development is more important and in no ways am I against the city park closing in that location. It’s prime real estate!Radelaide wrote:Calm down mate. The development of a +$100m medical education building is a little more important than where kids are going to skate. Geez when I was younger we didn't have the luxury of such a skate park and still found ways to skate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Though you can’t simply close a popular recreation attraction and not have a replacement planned. All it’s going to do is drive those kids to skate in around public infrastructure, causing damage to property (costing taxpayers) and potentially putting pedestrians at risk from injury. It could also drive some individuals into petty crime due to boredom.
The fact that this park closed in what March, and since then people have been jumping the fence to use the park just shows there is demand for a city park. The city already lacks attractions and activities for teenagers to do, it needs more not less. (Going off topic)