Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
Patrick_27
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2559
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
#1561
Post
by Patrick_27 » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:33 pm
Cr Slama said the plan to change the square’s shape “was ridiculous”. “That would take us back to the ’60s,” he said.
W.O.W. Is this guy for real? God forbid, realigning the square wouldn't take us back to the 60's, it would take us out of the 60's which Adelaide seems to have been stuck in for forty-five years.
This council has already in such a short time frame proven that they're incompetent. Victoria Square is the heart of our city, and at this point in time, it looks awful; there is no balance between old and new and now the council are going to walk away from it?
They expect the government to provide them with necessary funding to complete it, but why should they? The government have at this point funded the redevelop a substantial amount of public space within the CBD (with more proposals to be funding in the coming years) and yet the council want to squeeze a little bit more out of them?
If the ACC aren't going to invest their earnings into Victoria Square, where else are they going to invest it? I don't see any alternative proposals that have surfaced.
-
Matt
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:36 pm
- Location: London
#1562
Post
by Matt » Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:45 pm
Absolutely pathetic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
rev
- SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm
#1563
Post
by rev » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:34 pm
I got one question....
WHEN IS THE STATE GOVERNMENT GOING TO SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH WITH THE ADELAIDE CITY CIRCUS AND THE CLOWNS WITHIN IT AND RELEGATE THEM TO COLLECTING RUBBISH??
-
Goodsy
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
#1564
Post
by Goodsy » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:47 pm
rev wrote:I got one question....
WHEN IS THE STATE GOVERNMENT GOING TO SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH WITH THE ADELAIDE CITY CIRCUS AND THE CLOWNS WITHIN IT AND RELEGATE THEM TO COLLECTING RUBBISH??
what's the alternative? fire the lot and elect an entirely new council, or fire the lot and remove the ACC completely and have the CBD run directly from the State government?
-
Wayno
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#1565
Post
by Wayno » Wed Aug 05, 2015 5:00 pm
I know Lord Mayors are limited to 2 terms, but what about Councillors?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#1566
Post
by Norman » Wed Aug 05, 2015 5:26 pm
There is no limit for councillors. Look at how long Anne Moran has been there.
-
[Shuz]
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
#1567
Post
by [Shuz] » Wed Aug 05, 2015 5:45 pm
Surely there has to be a provision within either the electoral act or local government act that the State Government can intervene and sack the Adelaide City Council and either appoint an interim council until new elections are held or take over all administrative matters into a State Government Department?
I know such provisions already exist within the Development Act re: Council DAPs can be sacked and referred to the DAC.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
-
serca
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:46 pm
#1568
Post
by serca » Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:07 pm
Back off people!!! Just tone it down a bit ok. The council is under tremendous pressure with real life shit. Haven't you heard there are food trucks in our CBD, crazy right. Your also not taking into account they are dealing with brackets and fairy lights and big poles to illuminate our most populated shopping and tourism strip, this stuff generally sucks all the resources and energy for years out of any modern city council. So I ask what is the big deal in "slightly" reducing a 70M dollar plan to 70K, by having one side of the very centre of our city, as a modern aesthetically pleasing Urban space and the other side with some big gum trees and grassed off area's. Now excuse me while I spend the rest of the night deciding what band-aid I'm going to put on my broken leg.
P.S this is why I never read the city council thread.
-
Goodsy
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
#1569
Post
by Goodsy » Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:14 pm
serca wrote:Back off people!!! Just tone it down a bit ok. The council is under tremendous pressure with real life shit. Haven't you heard there are food trucks in our CBD, crazy right. Your also not taking into account they are dealing with brackets and fairy lights and big poles to illuminate our most populated shopping and tourism strip, this stuff generally sucks all the resources and energy for years out of any modern city council. So I ask what is the big deal in "slightly" reducing a 70M dollar plan to 70K, by having one side of the very centre of our city, as a modern aesthetically pleasing Urban space and the other side with some big gum trees and grassed off area's. Now excuse me while I spend the rest of the night deciding what band-aid I'm going to put on my broken leg.
P.S this is why I never read the city council thread.
Don't you have an O-Bahn tunnel to protest?
-
serca
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:46 pm
#1570
Post
by serca » Wed Aug 05, 2015 6:34 pm
GoodSmackUp wrote:serca wrote:Back off people!!! Just tone it down a bit ok. The council is under tremendous pressure with real life shit. Haven't you heard there are food trucks in our CBD, crazy right. Your also not taking into account they are dealing with brackets and fairy lights and big poles to illuminate our most populated shopping and tourism strip, this stuff generally sucks all the resources and energy for years out of any modern city council. So I ask what is the big deal in "slightly" reducing a 70M dollar plan to 70K, by having one side of the very centre of our city, as a modern aesthetically pleasing Urban space and the other side with some big gum trees and grassed off area's. Now excuse me while I spend the rest of the night deciding what band-aid I'm going to put on my broken leg.
P.S this is why I never read the city council thread.
Don't you have an O-Bahn tunnel to protest?
Don't you have a WEA course to attend on how and when to interpret sarcasm ?
-
Goodsy
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
#1571
Post
by Goodsy » Wed Aug 05, 2015 7:04 pm
serca wrote:GoodSmackUp wrote:serca wrote:Back off people!!! Just tone it down a bit ok. The council is under tremendous pressure with real life shit. Haven't you heard there are food trucks in our CBD, crazy right. Your also not taking into account they are dealing with brackets and fairy lights and big poles to illuminate our most populated shopping and tourism strip, this stuff generally sucks all the resources and energy for years out of any modern city council. So I ask what is the big deal in "slightly" reducing a 70M dollar plan to 70K, by having one side of the very centre of our city, as a modern aesthetically pleasing Urban space and the other side with some big gum trees and grassed off area's. Now excuse me while I spend the rest of the night deciding what band-aid I'm going to put on my broken leg.
P.S this is why I never read the city council thread.
Don't you have an O-Bahn tunnel to protest?
Don't you have a WEA course to attend on how and when to interpret sarcasm ?
I think you should be the one taking that course
-
serca
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:46 pm
#1572
Post
by serca » Wed Aug 05, 2015 7:33 pm
I'll eat my words and take a brush up course
-
Brando
- Donating Member
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:11 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#1573
Post
by Brando » Wed Aug 05, 2015 9:19 pm
Wayno wrote:I know Lord Mayors are limited to 2 terms, but what about Councillors?
Obviously not mate, Anne Moran has been there since 1960.
-
Wayno
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#1574
Post
by Wayno » Wed Aug 05, 2015 9:46 pm
Mark my words.
There will come a day, not too far distant, where apartment residents will rise up in number, percentage and voice to oppose the diminishing caste of regressive and conservative single storey low life's who voted this band of misfits into Council.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
Honey of a City
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 6:42 pm
#1575
Post
by Honey of a City » Wed Aug 05, 2015 10:10 pm
The voters at the last ACC election returned a bunch of clueless and visionless Councillors, or corporate puppets, or both, whose primary objective is to obfuscate and fumble around with half-finished projects, to totally undo others, and to unravel the progress made over the last five years in the shortest possible time. Incredibly sad.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Ben, DM8, EBG, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 1 guest