[U/C] M2 North-South Motorway

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1546 Post by Waewick » Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:44 pm

we need to create a political party

Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1547 Post by Goodsy » Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:25 pm

Waewick wrote:we need to create a political party
Join up with the Nick Xenophon Team :)

how good is he
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1233
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1548 Post by how good is he » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:04 pm

Would it be possible that they plan to go overhead and not buy any more (or at least at lot less) existing properties on South Rd?
If they went up overhead from say the brickworks to down before the Gallipoli underpass and then up again after the Tram bridge all the way to the Tonsley/Ayliffes Rd underpass, could it work?
Further it would be done over largely commercial areas similar to the Grand Junction Rd/overhead expressway.
Similarly if they went over (or even under) Regency Rd (& just block off either side of Pym St), would it not mean the whole 80km of South Rd is finished as a non-stop freeway/motorway?

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1549 Post by claybro » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:15 am

The area thru mile end thebabarton is heavily populated and an elevated road in this vicinity would not only be an eyesore, but also create noise problems over a wide area given adelaides flat terrain. A sound shel would need to cover most of the route. Similar situation thru Black Forest.

bits
Legendary Member!
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:24 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1550 Post by bits » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:23 am

claybro wrote:The area thru mile end thebabarton is heavily populated and an elevated road in this vicinity would not only be an eyesore, but also create noise problems over a wide area given adelaides flat terrain.
What was the reasoning for going up for the superway section?
I imagine going down you might have issues with ground water level and general flooding being so close to the ocean with almost zero elevation.
I imagine that might also be why the plan is to go over the Torrens river.

Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1551 Post by Goodsy » Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:45 am

bits wrote:
claybro wrote:The area thru mile end thebabarton is heavily populated and an elevated road in this vicinity would not only be an eyesore, but also create noise problems over a wide area given adelaides flat terrain.
What was the reasoning for going up for the superway section?
I imagine going down you might have issues with ground water level and general flooding being so close to the ocean with almost zero elevation.
I imagine that might also be why the plan is to go over the Torrens river.
most likely soil contamination

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2559
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1552 Post by Patrick_27 » Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:01 pm

GoodSmackUp wrote:
bits wrote:
claybro wrote:The area thru mile end thebabarton is heavily populated and an elevated road in this vicinity would not only be an eyesore, but also create noise problems over a wide area given adelaides flat terrain.
What was the reasoning for going up for the superway section?
I imagine going down you might have issues with ground water level and general flooding being so close to the ocean with almost zero elevation.
I imagine that might also be why the plan is to go over the Torrens river.
most likely soil contamination
I also believe it was the avoid disrupting rail freight services through the area, which is also why it was built so high...If double-stacked rail freight becomes a thing they'd need to have a road elevated at-least two shipping containers worth above.

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1553 Post by crawf » Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:12 pm

Patrick_27 wrote: If double-stacked rail freight becomes a thing they'd need to have a road elevated at-least two shipping containers worth above.
There is already double stacked rail freight in Adelaide.

Goodsy
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1554 Post by Goodsy » Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:35 pm

crawf wrote:
Patrick_27 wrote: If double-stacked rail freight becomes a thing they'd need to have a road elevated at-least two shipping containers worth above.
There is already double stacked rail freight in Adelaide.
I dont think double stacked containers go to Port Adelaide

Brucetiki
Legendary Member!
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:20 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1555 Post by Brucetiki » Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:35 pm

GoodSmackUp wrote:
Waewick wrote:we need to create a political party
Join up with the Nick Xenophon Team :)
All talk - no action

claybro
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1556 Post by claybro » Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:16 pm

Have to agree there. Plenty of kyboshing of everything, but no actual alternatives put up. Does he have a vision for Adelaide/SA besides closing down the pokies?

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2745
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1557 Post by ChillyPhilly » Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:10 pm

Just a random thought, will all of the complete North-South Corridor consist of trenches and elevated roads? Or will/can there be segments where the Corridor can be the surface road, and other major roads just be deviated beneath it?
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

bits
Legendary Member!
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:24 pm

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1558 Post by bits » Thu Jan 28, 2016 12:16 am

Surface road is used for access to existing buildings and roads.
Where is any decent stretch of south Rd that isn't lined with existing businesses and roads?
The freeway must be run at a different level to the existing south Rd, it is just the only practical way.

User avatar
SouthAussie94
Legendary Member!
Posts: 583
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
Location: Southern Suburbs

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1559 Post by SouthAussie94 » Thu Jan 28, 2016 10:35 am

ChillyPhilly wrote:Just a random thought, will all of the complete North-South Corridor consist of trenches and elevated roads? Or will/can there be segments where the Corridor can be the surface road, and other major roads just be deviated beneath it?
Section 7.1 of the North–South Corridor The 10 year Strategy (Available here: http://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/nsc ... y_strategy) talks about minimising redundancy when constructing each section (ie: there isn't much point building a section of road for it to then be ripped up in 3 years time when the next section of the corridor is constructed.) My understanding is that this reasoning is why the duplication of the SEXY was completed when it was. Duplicating it after upgrading Darlington would have resulted in portions of the Darlington upgrade being made redundant. Hence, the SEXY was duplicated before Darlington was upgraded.

The report has three guiding principles to minimise redundancy:
- Project section to start and finish at grade;
- Elevated structures to be delivered in one section;
- Tunnels or lowered road to be delivered in one section.

Image

Using these principles, I would say that it is highly likely that some sections of the North South Corridor will be at the level of the present day Road.

Where I foresee this changing is where on/off ramps are to be constructed, ie: Road section is delivered, with temporary ramp used. 5 years later, on/off ramps constructed, traffic diverted to on/off ramps, temporary ramp removed, elevated/trenched road now flows below/above grade into new section. Whether this is feasible and if the extra costs are worthwhile is something that would need to be looked at..
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"

Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation

Torrens_5022
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:34 am

[U/C] Re: News & Discussion: South Road / North-South Corridor

#1560 Post by Torrens_5022 » Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:57 pm

How will they do the section from the Torrens heading south?
The road is 7 lanes wide at the corner of South / Ashwin with no room to widen, do you think the section from the Torrens to Anzac Highway will only be two lanes in each direction.
Maybe a tunnel two lanes in each direction from Brickworks to James Congdon? The third lane will feed onto the surface road, so three lanes, two into tunnel third onto South Road (which will split into two) from after Torrens until just after James Condon.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests