Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
#1411
Post
by Llessur2002 » Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:41 pm
PeFe wrote:Why are Adelaide people spending $38 per week on transport when the the 28 day pass ($121.80) would only cost $30.45 per week making it the cheapest public transport out of the 5 major cities?
My thoughts exactly. Even with a standard Metrocard, peak fare is $3.54 - so $7.08 per day = $35.40 per week. Unless the average spend of $38 per week includes additional public transport trips on weekends and is not limited to commuting? Or a very significant proportion of commuters still buy paper tickets? Otherwise something doesn't smell right...
My earlier comments about Adelaide being cheap were compared to my overseas experiences with commuting by public transport. Even $46 per week in Brisbane is dirt cheap in comparison...
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#1412
Post
by Norman » Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:40 pm
PeFe wrote:Why are Adelaide people spending $38 per week on transport when the the 28 day pass ($121.80) would only cost $30.45 per week making it the cheapest public transport out of the 5 major cities?
And yes Adelaide is the cheapest.....$1.91 to go from Gawler to Seaford (78kms?) on the train in the middle of the day on a full priced Metrocard fare. You wont be doing that distance for that cost in any other Australian city.
Probably because not everyone is aware of the offer. It should be advertised more. Plenty of people on the weekends still buy paper tickets, which shows how often they use it.
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#1413
Post
by monotonehell » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:16 pm
PeFe wrote:...And yes Adelaide is the cheapest.....$1.91 to go from Gawler to Seaford (78kms?) on the train in the middle of the day on a full priced Metrocard fare. You wont be doing that distance for that cost in any other Australian city.
It's a moot point really. The only people who would need to suffer such long commutes on a regular basis are most likely ones who have no other choice and deserve the "discount". Anyone who had the option to take their car, probably would.
The idea that a passenger should pay more to go further is negated by the opportunity cost of time. Most services stop constantly along the route. And with Adelaide's habit of putting too many stations along our heavy rail routes, a long journey can sometimes take longer than taking a car.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
Torrens_5022
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:34 am
#1414
Post
by Torrens_5022 » Tue Sep 13, 2016 3:32 pm
The train trip Gawler to Seaford is 1 hour 50min - The distance is 85km - In peak hour traffic it's about 1hr 30min (according to Google) - Driving would cost about $6.50 in petrol say this person is on a concession ticket - $1.75. It's only 20mins quicker to drive, the train trip would be more comfortable. I doubt many people would be commuting that far but the train option is half the price of petrol if your full fare and over 6 times cheaper if your concession interpeak
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#1415
Post
by Norman » Tue Sep 13, 2016 4:49 pm
Unfortunately much of the housing is away from the train stations, so you need to also factor in a connecting bus in a lot of situations. Sure, it's cheaper, but we need to construct more housing near major transit corridors.
-
ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
-
Contact:
#1416
Post
by ChillyPhilly » Tue Sep 13, 2016 7:35 pm
Norman wrote:Unfortunately much of the housing is away from the train stations, so you need to also factor in a connecting bus in a lot of situations. Sure, it's cheaper, but we need to construct more housing near major transit corridors.
This, x100000.
Unfortunately to fulfil this need, and the good intentions originally kickstarted by the 30-Year Plan, the real estate industry needs a shake up. There's a stubborn sub-culture within real estate that every dwelling being sold needs to have a car space or have this aspect advertised, car space or not.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
-
Goodsy
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
#1417
Post
by Goodsy » Tue Sep 13, 2016 9:44 pm
ChillyPhilly wrote:Norman wrote:Unfortunately much of the housing is away from the train stations, so you need to also factor in a connecting bus in a lot of situations. Sure, it's cheaper, but we need to construct more housing near major transit corridors.
This, x100000.
Unfortunately to fulfil this need, and the good intentions originally kickstarted by the 30-Year Plan, the real estate industry needs a shake up. There's a stubborn sub-culture within real estate that every dwelling being sold needs to have a car space or have this aspect advertised, car space or not.
You're never going to convince the majority of people to give up their backyards and car's for smaller living spaces. The only way to do it is release a lot of land north of Adelaide for single dwellings and rezone inner city suburbs, forcing people out
-
Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
-
Contact:
#1418
Post
by Nathan » Tue Sep 13, 2016 9:44 pm
ChillyPhilly wrote:Norman wrote:Unfortunately much of the housing is away from the train stations, so you need to also factor in a connecting bus in a lot of situations. Sure, it's cheaper, but we need to construct more housing near major transit corridors.
This, x100000.
Unfortunately to fulfil this need, and the good intentions originally kickstarted by the 30-Year Plan, the real estate industry needs a shake up. There's a stubborn sub-culture within real estate that every dwelling being sold needs to have a car space or have this aspect advertised, car space or not.
There has been instances of developers trying to reduce the number of car spaces, but they've generally been met by howls of protest from neighbours who think it'll be an invite for millions of cars parking on the street. That apartment building in Collinswood being a recent example.
-
Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
-
Contact:
#1419
Post
by Nathan » Tue Sep 13, 2016 9:49 pm
GoodSmackUp wrote:You're never going to convince the majority of people to give up their backyards and car's for smaller living spaces. The only way to do it is release a lot of land north of Adelaide for single dwellings and rezone inner city suburbs, forcing people out
I think you can convince people, but it's hard. People generally want what they know, and the majority have grown up in exactly that type of housing. This is reinforced by the media, defining the "Australian Dream". What's needed is excellent examples of denser living, to show people that it's not the same as this communist hell hole most seem to picture in their minds (and I believe that's very much the intention with Bowden). This needs to be backed up with Australian media (TV shows, magazines, newspapers, etc.) depicting a greater variety of housing types (and not perpetuating the idea that apartment living is either something for the very poor, or for the very rich).
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#1420
Post
by Norman » Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:09 pm
The good news is that the government is moving to 85% infill for new housing, with 60% along mass transit corridors. So there is some hope at least, because that will make or public transport more sustainable and prone for upgrades and expansion.
-
SBD
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2708
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
- Location: Blakeview
#1421
Post
by SBD » Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:42 pm
Torrens_5022 wrote:The train trip Gawler to Seaford is 1 hour 50min - The distance is 85km - In peak hour traffic it's about 1hr 30min (according to Google) - Driving would cost about $6.50 in petrol say this person is on a concession ticket - $1.75. It's only 20mins quicker to drive, the train trip would be more comfortable. I doubt many people would be commuting that far but the train option is half the price of petrol if your full fare and over 6 times cheaper if your concession interpeak
Not all real journeys conveniently start and finish where the key transport nodes are.
I recently had to travel from home in Blakeview to be at an address in Morphett Vale by 9am on a weekday. Google Maps said that driving would take 1:10-1:40 and advised to leave by 7:20, which I did and arrived at about 8:45, despite passing through both major South Road upgrades (the thickest traffic was actually Elder Smith Road). By comparison, Google maps said public transport would take 2:09 and cycling would take 2:08. I admit I live in a PT-unfriendly corner of the suburb.
-
85trainfan
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:26 pm
#1423
Post
by 85trainfan » Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:17 pm
This carpark used to be a bit of a "problem Area", so the government installed a giant fence, boom gates and had security guards patrolling. Now the Boom gates are locked in the open position and the security guards and their hut have been removed.
Regards Jarrod
Any posts made are my own opinion and do not represent any organisation with which I am associated.
-
adelaide transport
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 12:01 pm
#1424
Post
by adelaide transport » Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:39 am
Adelaide Metro on their website have proposed changes to bus stops on both Goodwood Road and Glen Osmond Road in order to speed up services.A map of bus stops on both roads is shown with proposals to remove or move some stops. Public feedback is available via the feedback form.
This is long overdue and many other roads and routes need to be looked at as well.
In fact the whole network needs relooking at as we really haven't seen any major changes to bus routes for a long time,yet peoples travelling habits have and are changing.
To attract more people onto Public Transport services must be faster ,more frequent with easy to understand Route numbers and not all ending up in the City.
-
PD2/20
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 2:32 pm
#1425
Post
by PD2/20 » Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:32 am
adelaide transport wrote:Adelaide Metro on their website have proposed changes to bus stops on both Goodwood Road and Glen Osmond Road in order to speed up services.A map of bus stops on both roads is shown with proposals to remove or move some stops. Public feedback is available via the feedback form.
This is long overdue and many other roads and routes need to be looked at as well.
In fact the whole network needs relooking at as we really haven't seen any major changes to bus routes for a long time,yet peoples travelling habits have and are changing.
To attract more people onto Public Transport services must be faster ,more frequent with easy to understand Route numbers and not all ending up in the City.
Link is
http://www.adelaidemetro.com.au/Bus-Sto ... ement-Plan
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests