News & Discussion: Trams

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3791
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1261 Post by Waewick » Thu Dec 15, 2016 8:35 pm

Yeah the platforms look great. Election 2018 going to be interesting for PT.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2138
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1262 Post by Llessur2002 » Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:17 pm

rubberman wrote:However, does that mean the track and Festercentre stop are just constructed to ensure that extension to North Adel and beyond doesn't foul Nth Terrace, and they won't be used for regular services till the extension proper occurs (except maybe special services thru the Festival, or short workings if the Nth Tce extension is closed for some reason)?
I (hopefully) can't see that happening - I can only being to imagine the uproar that building a disused tramline would cause. I reckon at the least they would run shuttle services from the new stop to South Terrace or one of the other CBD stops.

User avatar
The Scooter Guy
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1667
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:45 pm
Location: Anywhere!
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1263 Post by The Scooter Guy » Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:21 pm

Llessur2002 wrote:And a video

Those stop shelters on North Tce make a nice new spot for viewing the Fringe Opening Parade & the Xmas Pageant.
For starters, my avatar is the well-known Adelaide Aquatic Centre insignia from 1989.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWk8YPx2zHziHgvyPy_9fxQ
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanthescooterguy/
http://ryansbedroom.tumblr.com/

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3659
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1264 Post by SRW » Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:33 pm

Image
Unrelated to the tram extension - which is great! - but that slip lane from King William Rd to North Tce needs to die or at least be reconfigured (i.e. narrowed).
Keep Adelaide Weird

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2582
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1265 Post by Patrick_27 » Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:45 pm

Speaking about minimising disruption by doing more than expected... Would it be too much to suggest realignment of the tram-track around Victoria Square to cater for the potential (eventual) re-squaring? :wink:

User avatar
mshagg
Legendary Member!
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:50 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1266 Post by mshagg » Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:49 pm

SRW wrote:
Image
Unrelated to the tram extension - which is great! - but that slip lane from King William Rd to North Tce needs to die or at least be reconfigured (i.e. narrowed).
Or controlled. It's a ped-unfriendly hazard.

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1267 Post by ChillyPhilly » Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:04 pm

Agree about that slip lane. It's an accident waiting to happen. It's as wide as it is because that's the main entrance to Government House.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2582
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1268 Post by Patrick_27 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 2:17 am

mshagg wrote:
SRW wrote:
Image
Unrelated to the tram extension - which is great! - but that slip lane from King William Rd to North Tce needs to die or at least be reconfigured (i.e. narrowed).
Or controlled. It's a ped-unfriendly hazard.
Glad I'm not the only one who thought this... I think it's designed the way it is to cater for the military proceedings the come from Government House to Parliament House with every opening of the Parliamentary year.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3306
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1269 Post by [Shuz] » Fri Dec 16, 2016 8:50 am

I have to give massive credit to the State Government for how they've gone about this next round of extensions, there's not one thing I can fault about it judging by the video fly through.

Wiring to be hung from sides instead of middle poles. Tick.
Utilising existing street lamps to hang wiring. Tick.
Seperate side platforms instead of one central congested platform. Tick.
Track provision beyond last stops to cater for turnbacks and showing commitment to future extensions. Tick.
Doing North Terrace grand junction in one hit rather than two. Tick.
3 new trams to cater for required increased frequencies. Tick.
Continuation of similar shelter design / branding. Tick.
Strategically placed stops at Festival Plaza, Museum, Adelaide University and Old RAH. Tick.
Good compromise between tram track route and traffic management with slip lanes still intact at key intersections. Tick.
Commitment to sustainable effective infrastructure funding and jobs creation during challenging economic times. Tick.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Brucetiki
Legendary Member!
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:20 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1270 Post by Brucetiki » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:13 am

Not surprisingly the card carrying Liberal members have hit the news sites bagging the upgrade as a tram to nowhere once again.

You'd have thought that being proven wrong repeatedly about the previous expansions they'd just shut up and go away now.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1271 Post by monotonehell » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:36 am

Brucetiki wrote:Not surprisingly the card carrying Liberal members have hit the news sites bagging the upgrade as a tram to nowhere once again.

You'd have thought that being proven wrong repeatedly about the previous expansions they'd just shut up and go away now.
According to people with that mindset, unless tax payer funds are pouring directly into their wallet, all government expenditure is a waste of money.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Llessur2002
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2138
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1272 Post by Llessur2002 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:43 am

Brucetiki wrote:Not surprisingly the card carrying Liberal members have hit the news sites bagging the upgrade as a tram to nowhere once again.

You'd have thought that being proven wrong repeatedly about the previous expansions they'd just shut up and go away now.
But now they've got to inDaily. I used to enjoy the comments section of inDaily... :(

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1273 Post by skyliner » Fri Dec 16, 2016 12:45 pm

[Shuz] wrote:I have to give massive credit to the State Government for how they've gone about this next round of extensions, there's not one thing I can fault about it judging by the video fly through.

Wiring to be hung from sides instead of middle poles. Tick.
Utilising existing street lamps to hang wiring. Tick.
Seperate side platforms instead of one central congested platform. Tick.
Track provision beyond last stops to cater for turnbacks and showing commitment to future extensions. Tick.
Doing North Terrace grand junction in one hit rather than two. Tick.
3 new trams to cater for required increased frequencies. Tick.
Continuation of similar shelter design / branding. Tick.
Strategically placed stops at Festival Plaza, Museum, Adelaide University and Old RAH. Tick.
Good compromise between tram track route and traffic management with slip lanes still intact at key intersections. Tick.
Commitment to sustainable effective infrastructure funding and jobs creation during challenging economic times. Tick.
Well thought out Shuz and completely agree - esp seeing the KWS Sth stop fixed up as well. I have to admid I thought that not much of the original tram system would ever return - huge expense. I'm looking forward to the airport getting trams as well as the city loops.

The comment about development following tramlines I think holds true - look at KWS Sth.

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE.
Jack.

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1274 Post by metro » Fri Dec 16, 2016 5:15 pm

I agree with Shuz, ticks a lot of boxes and lays the foundations of an inner-suburban light-rail network, from this there could be extensions to any of the following: North Adel/Prospect, Melb St/Walkerville/Collinswood, Norwood/Magill/Marden.

The only problem I can see with this is the Festival Centre stop is very close to the Railway station and Rundle Mall stops, I think would be better to put it further north so it's closer to the pathway at the back of Government house so that anyone coming down the new Kintore Ave War-Path or from the University can directly cross King William St to get over to Elder Park (and the new Festival Centre riverbank area) without having to walk up hill to Festival Drive, and then back down again.

Also I think right turns from North Tce into Gawler Place and Kintore Ave should have been removed, and turning right into Frome St should have either been made into a hook-turn or been removed with a u-turn facility put in either just after the East End tram stop or at the East Tce lights. People have adapted to the loss of right-turns down King William St, they should be able to adapt on North Tce as well.

Looking forward to seeing more trams in Adelaide!! :applause:

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3791
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1275 Post by Waewick » Fri Dec 16, 2016 5:19 pm

Brucetiki wrote:Not surprisingly the card carrying Liberal members have hit the news sites bagging the upgrade as a tram to nowhere once again.

You'd have thought that being proven wrong repeatedly about the previous expansions they'd just shut up and go away now.
You know, this might suprise you, but people can have negative views and not be from the opposition party at the time.

I would hazard a guess that most people complaining aren't even political party members (like a good 95% of the state's population.). The libs have about 3000 state members I'd guess 99% of those wouldn't even have Internet.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests