News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 12:01 pm
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
The article on Infrastructure Australia was factual from an IA press release. This was confirmed by IA's director just a short time ago on 5AA to Leon Byner.
The State Government has budgeted $152.6 million to start the project in the 2017-2018 financial year.This is only for the Adelaide to Salisbury section.
The State Government has already spent $46 million on the section from Salisbury to Gawler,which has turned out to be wasted money as none of the work carried out is of any value or use on future work.
The State Government has budgeted $152.6 million to start the project in the 2017-2018 financial year.This is only for the Adelaide to Salisbury section.
The State Government has already spent $46 million on the section from Salisbury to Gawler,which has turned out to be wasted money as none of the work carried out is of any value or use on future work.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
Out of interest, why is this so?adelaide transport wrote:...The State Government has already spent $46 million on the section from Salisbury to Gawler,which has turned out to be wasted money as none of the work carried out is of any value or use on future work.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
IIRC this project dates back to the year before BHP announced that they were not going to go ahead with their expansion at Olympic Dam (Dec 2012). Several projects the SA Govt had in the pipeline at that point ground to a halt, as the expected income immediately dried up. I don't think this was originally supposed to be funded by the Feds, was it? The internal (SA Govt) business case may not have been sufficient for the IA funding. I'm sure one was done, because the project was started (poles in the ground), but who knows what the Feds require as far as a business case is concerned?
cheers,
Rhino
Rhino
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
They need to do something, I often get caught by the train crossing at Cormack road in the mornings around 7:45 and the 3000's look like they're about the burst with the amount of people inside. I don't know how many passengers get on at each stop but I imagine the trains are standing room only from Mawson Lakes to Adelaide
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
The wires will need to be done for the remaining platforms in the City, January maybe?adelaide transport wrote:The article on Infrastructure Australia was factual from an IA press release. This was confirmed by IA's director just a short time ago on 5AA to Leon Byner.
The State Government has budgeted $152.6 million to start the project in the 2017-2018 financial year.This is only for the Adelaide to Salisbury section.
The State Government has already spent $46 million on the section from Salisbury to Gawler,which has turned out to be wasted money as none of the work carried out is of any value or use on future work.
State Election is in 2018 so getting the poles and wires to Salisbury might get some votes
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
Electrification, if anything, may worsen this problem as it will attract more people to the trains, unless they start having regular 6 car services.GoodSmackUp wrote:They need to do something, I often get caught by the train crossing at Cormack road in the mornings around 7:45 and the 3000's look like they're about the burst with the amount of people inside. I don't know how many passengers get on at each stop but I imagine the trains are standing room only from Mawson Lakes to Adelaide
Most services these days it's standing room only between Mawson Lakes and Adelaide.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
With the upcoming State Budget and looming election, what's the bet that the State Government will announce electrification of the entire Gawler Line. It's well overdue and the residents of the northern suburbs deserve it.
Peak services along the Seaford and Gawler Lines should always be six cars.
I'm pretty sure that funding went towards upgrading Elizabeth, Munno Para and other stations, aswell as replacing rotting wooden sleepers with new concrete sleepers. Therefore I wouldn't call it a waste of money.adelaide transport wrote: The State Government has already spent $46 million on the section from Salisbury to Gawler,which has turned out to be wasted money as none of the work carried out is of any value or use on future work.
At least they will be permanently three cars and have more standing room. It's beyond ridiculous they still use 2-car services during PEAK, it makes for one horrendous daily trip in the morning and night.Brucetiki wrote:Electrification, if anything, may worsen this problem as it will attract more people to the trains, unless they start having regular 6 car services.
Most services these days it's standing room only between Mawson Lakes and Adelaide.
Peak services along the Seaford and Gawler Lines should always be six cars.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
Amen to that - as should the Footy Express trains!crawf wrote:
Peak services along the Seaford and Gawler Lines should always be six cars.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
The $46 million was for the early electrification work done during the Salisbury - Gawler revitalisation closure. This must have included the detailed design of the overheadcrawf wrote:With the upcoming State Budget and looming election, what's the bet that the State Government will announce electrification of the entire Gawler Line. It's well overdue and the residents of the northern suburbs deserve it.
I'm pretty sure that funding went towards upgrading Elizabeth, Munno Para and other stations, aswell as replacing rotting wooden sleepers with new concrete sleepers. Therefore I wouldn't call it a waste of money.adelaide transport wrote: The State Government has already spent $46 million on the section from Salisbury to Gawler,which has turned out to be wasted money as none of the work carried out is of any value or use on future work.
structure and the subsequent installation of concrete masts and footings for steel gantries between Nurlutta and Evanston.
On the Gawler Line only Salisbury and Elizabeth have platforms long enough for 6 cars. Mawson Lakes can only take 4.crawf wrote:At least they will be permanently three cars and have more standing room. It's beyond ridiculous they still use 2-car services during PEAK, it makes for one horrendous daily trip in the morning and night.Brucetiki wrote:Electrification, if anything, may worsen this problem as it will attract more people to the trains, unless they start having regular 6 car services.
Most services these days it's standing room only between Mawson Lakes and Adelaide.
Peak services along the Seaford and Gawler Lines should always be six cars.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 12:01 pm
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
Under the Labour Governments plan the Adelaide to Salisbury section would be electrified first. Passengers wishing to travel beyond Salisbury would be required to transfer at Salisbury to a diesel railcar to complete their journey.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
When this was first announced in 2008 it was all supposed to be finished in 2013,including the Seaford & Tonsely line, the Outer Harbour line and the Gawler line all electrified and converted to Standard gauge and here we are in 2017 still waiting.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
There was a significant event right around that time that might have played a part in the delay.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial ... _2007–2008
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial ... _2007–2008
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2764
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
Correct. The GFC impacted BHP's exploration and Olympic Dam expansion ambitions (as rhino said), which they put on hold indefinitely.bits wrote:There was a significant event right around that time that might have played a part in the delay.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial ... _2007–2008
From memory the Gawler electrification may have been a matched funds project between Federal Labor and the State Government. The scope was downgraded to be just from Adelaide to Dry Creek in the wake of the GFC, but then was extended to Salisbury. Pro-cars and roads Tony Abbott pulled funding almost immediately after winning office.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
That's just extremely inconvenient for those commuters wishing to travel past Salisbury, especially for an extra couple of minutes to the next major station at Elizabeth. It will deter people from using public transport and therefore attract even more congestion on our roads.adelaide transport wrote:Under the Labour Governments plan the Adelaide to Salisbury section would be electrified first. Passengers wishing to travel beyond Salisbury would be required to transfer at Salisbury to a diesel railcar to complete their journey.
My understanding was that diesel trains would still run from the City to Gawler though would be express until Salisbury, while an electric service stopping at all stations from Salisbury to the City. Honestly the whole thing sounds complicated, just do the entire line in one go and be done with it. I caught the train to Mawson Lakes a couple of days, and discovered things have just worsen with over-crowding and non-existent frequency. Don't miss that at all.
With Holden closing this year and nearly a decade of false promises, the northern suburbs deserve better than another half arsed plan. A full electrification of the Gawler Line will attract more patronage aswell as investment to the area which in return will create much needed jobs. Expecting people to cram into an electric train to Salisbury, then five minutes later cram like cattle into a diesel powered train will have a negative effect on patronage and is an insult to those people.
Which was very poor planning. Any new train stations should have space to fit a minimum of six cars, thankfully the Seaford Line extension fits this requirement.PD2/20 wrote: On the Gawler Line only Salisbury and Elizabeth have platforms long enough for 6 cars. Mawson Lakes can only take 4.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 7:31 pm
Re: U/C: Electrification & Upgrade of the Adelaide Rail Netw
Electrify the whole damn thing for goodness sake, its not that hard
Follow me on Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/135625678@N06/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/135625678@N06/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests