Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
Ho Really
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2721
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
- Location: In your head
#241
Post
by Ho Really » Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:56 pm
Pikey wrote:...To be honest, the redesign isn't too bad at all.
At least there's more glass, and it's done by a SA company unlike the City Central development.
Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
-
bmw boy
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:45 am
#242
Post
by bmw boy » Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:10 pm
Ho Really wrote:Pikey wrote:...To be honest, the redesign isn't too bad at all.
At least there's more glass, and it's done by a SA company unlike the City Central development.
Cheers
more glass??
how so...
-
Will
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5870
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#243
Post
by Will » Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:16 pm
Ho Really wrote:Pikey wrote:...To be honest, the redesign isn't too bad at all.
At least there's more glass, and it's done by a SA company unlike the City Central development.
Cheers
City Central is being done by Woods Bagot, an Adelaide company.
But to be honest, I would rather our buildings be done by interstate or overseas firms, as judging by our recent spate of developments, our architects are stuck in the 1970s and 1980s.
-
urban
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:59 am
- Location: City of Unley
#244
Post
by urban » Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:36 am
Not all Adelaide Architect's are stuck in the 70's & 80's but unfortunately the big 3 establishment firms are. Our most interesting work is being done by small companies. Check out the entries in this years Architect's awards for proof.
-
Ho Really
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2721
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
- Location: In your head
#245
Post
by Ho Really » Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:37 am
bmw boy wrote:more glass??
how so...
The former artist's impression showed less glass.
Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
-
Ho Really
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2721
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
- Location: In your head
#246
Post
by Ho Really » Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:40 am
Will wrote:City Central is being done by Woods Bagot, an Adelaide company.
I wasn't talking about the architects, but rather the companies installing the glass facades (including framework).
Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
-
bmw boy
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:45 am
#247
Post
by bmw boy » Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:40 am
Ho Really wrote:bmw boy wrote:more glass??
how so...
The former artist's impression showed less glass.
Cheers
I think im getting confused as to which 1 is this new render...
I thought the bigger render on the last page was the old one ....and the smaller render is this new 1 that has just been announced or sumthng.......... but they both have been there since pgs 4 - 7 of this thread...
-
Will
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5870
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#248
Post
by Will » Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:34 pm
urban wrote:Not all Adelaide Architect's are stuck in the 70's & 80's but unfortunately the big 3 establishment firms are. Our most interesting work is being done by small companies. Check out the entries in this years Architect's awards for proof.
Yeah, you are right. My comment is primarily aimed at the big 3, which coincidentally get the big jobs which make an impact on the skyline.
-
Will
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5870
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#249
Post
by Will » Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:36 pm
bmw boy wrote:Ho Really wrote:bmw boy wrote:more glass??
how so...
The former artist's impression showed less glass.
Cheers
I think im getting confused as to which 1 is this new render...
I thought the bigger render on the last page was the old one ....and the smaller render is this new 1 that has just been announced or sumthng.......... but they both have been there since pgs 4 - 7 of this thread...
The current one is the one that has the bland blue glass facade. (the bigger render)
-
bmw boy
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:45 am
#250
Post
by bmw boy » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:03 pm
oohk then good, thats the 1 i like lol
-
Savoy
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:33 am
#251
Post
by Savoy » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:31 am
AtD wrote:That render doesn't do it justice, it looks a lot taller in reality. It has some serious bulk to it.
Also the glass is already looking a lot better IMO. A rare case of when a building truns out better than its render perhaps...no, definitely.
-
Pikey
- VIP Member
- Posts: 2496
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: Sitting Down
#252
Post
by Pikey » Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:25 am
-
skyliner
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
- Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)
#254
Post
by skyliner » Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:15 pm
I have to admit I've never seen so much carry on about an 11 storey building - I guess it's because of it's prominent location. VIC SQ. is startng to look quite impressive overall - especially when seen via Bill's photos. A pity the building was'nt 20 odd floors. Appears as though it will turn out OK. The square now needx filling in the SW corner - not much chance there though. I gather there is more to come on the NW corner yet however.
I really appreciate all the photos you guys take. Sorry I can't contribute much in this realm from Brisbane. :
(
Can't wait to get back and see all this.
ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CBD SKYLINE.
Jack.
-
Shuz
- Banned
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
- Location: Glandore
#255
Post
by Shuz » Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:22 pm
Well, hot diggity damn. That's coming up real fine, loving the blue glass it really is making its mark on vic sqaure. I love the contrast of old vs new with the church, and it fits so well with the comm law courts.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Will and 5 guests