News & Discussion: Trams

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1786 Post by Norman » Mon Oct 02, 2017 7:09 pm

Nathan wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 7:03 pm
They’ve been a bit confused with the works from Ayers House to East Tce, with the new gutters randomly alternating between the charcoal (as the rest of North Tce) and normal light grey. Looks a bit rediculous.
As far as I can see, the standard concrete is the old stuff and the charcoal kerbing is the new one.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3816
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1787 Post by Nathan » Mon Oct 02, 2017 7:12 pm

Norman wrote:
Nathan wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 7:03 pm
They’ve been a bit confused with the works from Ayers House to East Tce, with the new gutters randomly alternating between the charcoal (as the rest of North Tce) and normal light grey. Looks a bit rediculous.
As far as I can see, the standard concrete is the old stuff and the charcoal kerbing is the new one.
Nope, the standard concrete is new too. It's the re-profiled section in front of the terraces, which used to be angled parking (and had very old crumbling gutters).
Last edited by Nathan on Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1788 Post by timtam20292 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:00 pm

Wow, great photos Norman :applause:

rubberman
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2006
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1789 Post by rubberman » Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:52 pm

20171003_121150_resized.jpg
Rails on site
20171003_121150_resized.jpg (280.65 KiB) Viewed 2998 times
Snapped between the traffic.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1790 Post by Norman » Tue Oct 03, 2017 9:36 pm

As at 9:30pm tonight

KWS to Pulteney
Most of the 2 centre lanes of the roadway have been dug out

Pulteney to Frome
One centre lane partially dug out

Frome to ORAH
Currently being dug up

OlympusAnt
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 7:31 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1791 Post by OlympusAnt » Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:23 pm

They seem to be doing it pretty quick, which they have to. Its gonna be chaos for a bit of time.
Follow me on Flickr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/135625678@N06/

citywatcher
Legendary Member!
Posts: 870
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:51 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1792 Post by citywatcher » Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:28 pm

Yes Adelaide drivers pls note find alternate route does not mean all of ya drive down Grenfell St instead

Sent from my GT-S7275T using Tapatalk


User avatar
timtam20292
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1793 Post by timtam20292 » Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:59 pm

I noticed today that what I thought were concrete barriers are actually made out of metal lol

Yes lots of work has already been done, I think the 24 hour work was a very good idea.
Last edited by timtam20292 on Wed Oct 04, 2017 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3650
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1794 Post by SRW » Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:56 am

Traffic, including buses, was backed up and delayed for decent lengths of time yesterday, overflowing to Rundle and Pultney Streets. Don't drive here unless you need to.
Keep Adelaide Weird

Brucetiki
Legendary Member!
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:20 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1795 Post by Brucetiki » Wed Oct 04, 2017 9:36 am

SRW wrote:
Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:56 am
Traffic, including buses, was backed up and delayed for decent lengths of time yesterday, overflowing to Rundle and Pultney Streets. Don't drive here unless you need to.
And of course the local media outlets were out in force - more than happy to air the uneducated 'tram to nowhere' vox pops.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1796 Post by monotonehell » Wed Oct 04, 2017 10:55 am

SRW wrote:
Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:56 am
Traffic, including buses, was backed up and delayed for decent lengths of time yesterday, overflowing to Rundle and Pultney Streets. Don't drive here unless you need to.
Can we have an education programme, please?

DO NOT ENTER A BLOCKED INTERSECTION!

Every day I see people doing this (both private vehicles and the occasional bus). It causes a lot of congestion.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Kasey771
Legendary Member!
Posts: 603
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:56 am

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1797 Post by Kasey771 » Wed Oct 04, 2017 11:57 am

Brucetiki wrote:
Wed Oct 04, 2017 9:36 am
SRW wrote:
Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:56 am
Traffic, including buses, was backed up and delayed for decent lengths of time yesterday, overflowing to Rundle and Pultney Streets. Don't drive here unless you need to.
And of course the local media outlets were out in force - more than happy to air the uneducated 'tram to nowhere' vox pops.
The usual gang of idiots are parroting on in AdelaideNow comments. Do not read them if you value your sanity.
I love the idea that this was all just sprung overnight on an unsuspecting populace! Each moaner caught in traffic seems to think it is their right to receive a knock on the door from an employee of DPTI to personally explain how to keep an eye on the local news and to plan an alternate route. If you could trust the Sadvertiser more, DPTI might have used it as a vehicle for spreading the word?
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.

I Follow PAFC
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 447
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 7:23 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1798 Post by I Follow PAFC » Wed Oct 04, 2017 2:44 pm

Tram cash grab.
Council chases $600 million election bounty.

A TRAM running from the city to Port Adelaide and Outer Harbor is the number one item on the council’s wishlist ahead of next year’s state election.

Port Adelaide Enfield Council has endorsed a plan requesting more than $600 million from the State Government for local projects including the PortLINK light rail network, a digital hub, upgrades to sporting facilities, a new waterfront fish market and a bike link from the Port to Mawson Lakes. Mayor Gary Johanson said the $558 million PortLINK – which would form part of a $3 billion Adelaide-wide tram network – was the council’s number one priority. “It would be the making of the Port,” Mr Johanson said.

more: http://messenger.smedia.com.au/portside ... k=7291B2DA

:wallbash: :wallbash:
I Follow The Port Adelaide Football Club
https://www.facebook.com/IFollowThePAFC/

rubberman
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2006
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1799 Post by rubberman » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:10 pm

As I was going past today, I noticed a couple of old wooden sleepers just pulled out from the old tram track. In a couple of places you can also see the slots in the old grouted ballasted tram track where sleepers originally were located. (The MTT used sleepers in ballasted track with cement grout dribbled through the ballast to form a weak mass concrete encasing the sleepers).

Jaymz
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:12 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

#1800 Post by Jaymz » Wed Oct 04, 2017 6:42 pm

I'm never going to complain about a project like this, happy to see it underway so quickly. However, would've much preferred to see the electrification of the northern rail line first.

Why extend the tram line to an area that has just had our major hospital moved from it?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 8 guests