News & Discussion: Trams
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
This could be the reason for the single track section by the Student apartment building. The mobile crane is taking down the tower crane today. It is supported only by the outrigger jacks which are where the second track would be located. All the crane wheels are off the ground.
- Attachments
-
- 20171021_single track.jpg (283.73 KiB) Viewed 3321 times
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Services that stop at A1 should just be directed to B1 and maybe services that stop at A2/A3 should be directed to stop b2
- HeapsGood
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 10:54 am
- Location: At the Adelaide Airport thankfully now not having to use a Dyson Airblade
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Do you think perhaps that Labor will announce as an election sweetener to extend the tram out to Adelaide Oval?
*Looks at Dyson Airblade Factory* "I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure"
- Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Nah I reckon that's too small for an election announcement. I reckon they'd be more likely to announce the Parade extension, or possibly the airport line.HeapsGood wrote:Do you think perhaps that Labor will announce as an election sweetener to extend the tram out to Adelaide Oval?
- HeapsGood
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 10:54 am
- Location: At the Adelaide Airport thankfully now not having to use a Dyson Airblade
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Small sure, not sure if the east link is budgeted yet. But a lot of footy fans would be happy by the extension to the oval.
*Looks at Dyson Airblade Factory* "I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure"
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
from a usefulness POV, completing the City Loop would be better IMO. Taking it out to Norwood is going to release all the " The Parade is too narrow! and what about the on-street parking? " whingers.Llessur2002 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:24 amNah I reckon that's too small for an election announcement. I reckon they'd be more likely to announce the Parade extension, or possibly the airport line.HeapsGood wrote:Do you think perhaps that Labor will announce as an election sweetener to extend the tram out to Adelaide Oval?
A city loop would prossibly have fewer visible opponents, making it a much better porkbarrel leading in to the election.
Big infrastructure investments are usually under-valued and & over-criticized while in the planning stage. It's much easier to envision the here and now costs and inconveniences, and far more difficult to imagine fully the eventual benefits.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2556
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
I'd say either a city loop or North Adelaide extension (inc. Adelaide Oval). Though, an extension out to the Parade or Unley would certainly be something to pitch to voters of two very safe Liberal seats. Who knows? I would say that these works however are merely a catalyst for an imminent announcement. Gets voters thinking: "Well, it now makes sense to extend the line to Adelaide Oval or the Parade having done all of this."
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
I would think that the majority of people who live in Norwood would be the 4wd-vehicle-single-occupant type who would react negatively to any more "traffic disruptions" and wouldn't go near public transport even if it was very good. This is just my opinion, I could be wrong, but speaking and working with people in that demographic this seems to be the attitude.Patrick_27 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:52 pmI'd say either a city loop or North Adelaide extension (inc. Adelaide Oval). Though, an extension out to the Parade or Unley would certainly be something to pitch to voters of two very safe Liberal seats. Who knows? I would say that these works however are merely a catalyst for an imminent announcement. Gets voters thinking: "Well, it now makes sense to extend the line to Adelaide Oval or the Parade having done all of this."
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
There are also a lot of young renters in that area, as well as shoppers who would like easier access to the Parade. Then there are also the international students which live in the inner east. It's actually a very mixed area.monotonehell wrote:I would think that the majority of people who live in Norwood would be the 4wd-vehicle-single-occupant type who would react negatively to any more "traffic disruptions" and wouldn't go near public transport even if it was very good. This is just my opinion, I could be wrong, but speaking and working with people in that demographic this seems to be the attitude.Patrick_27 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:52 pmI'd say either a city loop or North Adelaide extension (inc. Adelaide Oval). Though, an extension out to the Parade or Unley would certainly be something to pitch to voters of two very safe Liberal seats. Who knows? I would say that these works however are merely a catalyst for an imminent announcement. Gets voters thinking: "Well, it now makes sense to extend the line to Adelaide Oval or the Parade having done all of this."
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
City loop would be the best bang for buck investment ... it would turbo-charge apartment development demand in the CBD ever further (look at what has happened on KW South since the tram extension) and CBD workers, tourists, day visitors, students and residents would all benefit on a daily basis. The benefits are spread more widely than just people from a particular area (Parade, Airport or wherever) being serviced by the tram.Patrick_27 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:52 pmI'd say either a city loop or North Adelaide extension (inc. Adelaide Oval). Though, an extension out to the Parade or Unley would certainly be something to pitch to voters of two very safe Liberal seats. Who knows? I would say that these works however are merely a catalyst for an imminent announcement. Gets voters thinking: "Well, it now makes sense to extend the line to Adelaide Oval or the Parade having done all of this."
However, politicians are not likely to see it from this perspective .... the thinking will be "let's propose a line where we think it will win us the most seats".
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
I thought their election promise in 2013 was funding for the entire network, it will probably be the same this time aroundLlessur2002 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:24 amNah I reckon that's too small for an election announcement. I reckon they'd be more likely to announce the Parade extension, or possibly the airport line.HeapsGood wrote:Do you think perhaps that Labor will announce as an election sweetener to extend the tram out to Adelaide Oval?
- Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Are we talking about federal Labor or state Labor?GoodSmackUp wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:04 pmI thought their election promise in 2013 was funding for the entire network, it will probably be the same this time aroundLlessur2002 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:24 amNah I reckon that's too small for an election announcement. I reckon they'd be more likely to announce the Parade extension, or possibly the airport line.HeapsGood wrote:Do you think perhaps that Labor will announce as an election sweetener to extend the tram out to Adelaide Oval?
State I imagine we *might* get a promise of an extension to the Parade, airport or, less likely, Prospect. An interesting curve ball would be extending the KWS line up past the Oval into North Adelaide. That would work wonders for making North Adelaide a bit more accessible but I don't think it's high on their priority or vote-winning list.
Federal Labor did make a pledge before the 2016 federal election to contribute $500M towards a 'major expansion' of the AdeLink network if they won. It would be great if they repeated the pledge at the next election but I'm not sure about the specifics of the funding - i.e. the actual funding arrangement could have been $500M over 30 years or something. It would be good to get at least one new line out of it in the short term though.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 4 guests