Ben always knows something you don't.
[CAN] 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Even at this height, it may not be the tallest proposal in development either...
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Y'all just need to stop hahah.
Question, is there even enough demand to facilitate said projects ?
Question, is there even enough demand to facilitate said projects ?
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Architecture is subjective, but based on your comments you will be very pleased with the design. I am personally a big fan of the designs for Realm, Adelaidean and 207 Pulteney.
Details of the building use will be released when the Client is ready, but 60 storeys over 195m height should be enough of an indication.
Like all of you, I'm looking forward to seeing it go in for planning. Amongst other things, it will generate the discussion we need to have about the future of our city. Increased CBD density is important for the vibrancy of our city, but also to reduce urban sprawl and improve sustainability and quality of life. This building will be a long overdue beacon of progress for Adelaide. Getting it built is more important than just the project itself. Key people in our city understand this.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
And this is great news that will hopefully pave the way for future projects.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Ben and Pikey - stop teasing us! My pants are wet with excitement as it is.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
True, thanks for the correction.
Don't get too excited Crawf.Ignore those responses, your updates are very much appreciated on here. Keep them comingCDJ wrote: I've been refraining from commenting due to the response I received earlier in the thread. It should be obvious to a sensible person why a professional can't divulge project images or specific details prior to planning submission, especially for a project of this scale.
This hasn't even been proposed yet, let alone been released as a vision.
It's just some person who you don't know anything about, you don't know who he is/where he works/what he is, making a claim. Remember the last time someone did that, Shuz, pretending there was a new tallest being proposed.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:12 pm
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Wow so the MIGHTY DOMINATOR 1 has a potential location.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
CDJ and anyone else who may have information and wants to contribute to these forums, please don't be deterred by the more pessimistic members of this forum. Your information is greatly valued. Dont disappear on the account of a few.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Architecture might be subjective.
But we can get consensus on what is crap and what is not.
But we can get consensus on what is crap and what is not.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Well... no. That's what subjective means. You might get an extreme case where a lot of people agree. But the architect might still love it.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
rev wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:34 pmDon't get too excited Crawf.
This hasn't even been proposed yet, let alone been released as a vision.
It's just some person who you don't know anything about, you don't know who he is/where he works/what he is, making a claim. Remember the last time someone did that, Shuz, pretending there was a new tallest being proposed.
That was a very long time ago. I remember the shear excitement over the Spire and 115KWS proposals, fast forward to 2017 and they are both incredibly underwhelming compared to what's being built. Not to mention over the last 5 years, height restrictions have been lifted and the CBD has undergone a major overhaul which is sparking a development boom.
Therefore it's definitely quite realistic at what CDJ is mentioning. Even if it isn't true, it's inevitable we will soon see a 200m proposal in the city. And I believe the Flinders/Franklin Street precinct is going to be that location.
-
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 10:58 pm
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Quite exciting to read about from over here in Sydney. We're moving our family back to Adelaide next year so looking fwd to seeing the CBD taking off a lil.
A quick side note, some people back there may not realise too that the submarine project is catching investor attention over here. With general housing obviously much more affordable in Adelaide don't be surprised if there is more competition from interstate investors...there is more optimism about the economy picking up in the future
A quick side note, some people back there may not realise too that the submarine project is catching investor attention over here. With general housing obviously much more affordable in Adelaide don't be surprised if there is more competition from interstate investors...there is more optimism about the economy picking up in the future
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:12 pm
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Which one is the spire? I can't think of any building in Adelaide which have spires.crawf wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 11:58 amrev wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:34 pmDon't get too excited Crawf.
This hasn't even been proposed yet, let alone been released as a vision.
It's just some person who you don't know anything about, you don't know who he is/where he works/what he is, making a claim. Remember the last time someone did that, Shuz, pretending there was a new tallest being proposed.
That was a very long time ago. I remember the shear excitement over the Spire and 115KWS proposals, fast forward to 2017 and they are both incredibly underwhelming compared to what's being built. Not to mention over the last 5 years, height restrictions have been lifted and the CBD has undergone a major overhaul which is sparking a development boom.
Therefore it's definitely quite realistic at what CDJ is mentioning. Even if it isn't true, it's inevitable we will soon see a 200m proposal in the city. And I believe the Flinders/Franklin Street precinct is going to be that location.
- slenderman
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:44 am
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Not to take this too far off-topic, but Spire was an approximately 100m proposal in Adelaide last decade that never got up, but was to be located on Bentham Street. There's a video of it on YouTube:Ser Noit of Loit wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 4:41 pmWhich one is the spire? I can't think of any building in Adelaide which have spires.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12xhRSlnX0A
Here's the thread on this website:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 4 guests