Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
Ser Noit of Loit
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:12 pm
#31
Post
by Ser Noit of Loit » Wed May 23, 2018 8:29 pm
HiTouch wrote: ↑Wed May 23, 2018 8:23 pm
Algernon wrote: ↑Wed May 23, 2018 5:06 pm
Totally out of scale with the area. It's on a totally different block to Westpac.
Just because it isn’t thicc doesn’t meant it’s out of scale. It’s space is relative to infinity in Brisbane which is 240m.
Westpac is one thicc boi anyway.
I think Algernon is being sarcastic.
So potentially another new tallest? Whew, Adelaide is picking up steam even if it's a metre at a time. I'm looking forward to the shots of the changed skyline.
-
Hybrid
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 8:14 am
#32
Post
by Hybrid » Wed May 23, 2018 9:12 pm
Good to finally have some information on this one. The coffee shop that was there closed at least 6 months ago due to the "redevelopment", but I could never find any further information.
-
Mpol03
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am
#33
Post
by Mpol03 » Wed May 23, 2018 9:31 pm
I don’t understand when things close we’ll before anything has even been approved. Does this mean it’s certain to at least past approval stage? That people are really committed to this project?
Possibly a stupid question but if anyone cares to endulge, be my guest.
-
Pikey
- VIP Member
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: Sitting Down
#34
Post
by Pikey » Wed May 23, 2018 10:05 pm
Mpol03 wrote: ↑Wed May 23, 2018 9:31 pm
I don’t understand when things close we’ll before anything has even been approved. Does this mean it’s certain to at least past approval stage? That people are really committed to this project?
Possibly a stupid question but if anyone cares to endulge, be my guest.
The previous tenants would have been from the previous owner. The site was sold last year if I recall correctly, so the new owners would have given ample notice to vacate. This would be the new owner getting their ducks in a row for the new development
-
Mpol03
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am
#35
Post
by Mpol03 » Wed May 23, 2018 10:18 pm
Thanks makes perfect sense hahaha. Cheers
-
HiTouch
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm
#36
Post
by HiTouch » Thu May 24, 2018 8:49 am
Waiting for a comment by ghs to crush our optimism and positivity.
-
Ben
- VIP Member
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#37
Post
by Ben » Thu May 24, 2018 9:02 am
First render
Looks very similar to one of the architects other projects one Adelaide... (not really the render)
-
Attachments
-
- kw.jpg (83.43 KiB) Viewed 4439 times
-
Mpol03
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am
#38
Post
by Mpol03 » Thu May 24, 2018 9:35 am
I love the architects and what they have done with Baju Henley (and hopefully with One Adelaide). The inclusion of various textures and materials is an element to their designs that really pushes ahead of what we've seen proposed lately.
-
Prodical
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 5:10 pm
#39
Post
by Prodical » Thu May 24, 2018 11:16 am
For a serious proposal, am I overly worried that the photo of Adelaide CBD used as the render is so many years old?
-
phenom
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 1:12 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD
#40
Post
by phenom » Thu May 24, 2018 11:20 am
It's not a real render, hence the emoticon. It's an enlarged version of the 260 Flinders development which has the same architect.
-
Ben
- VIP Member
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#41
Post
by Ben » Thu May 24, 2018 11:23 am
Prodical wrote: ↑Thu May 24, 2018 11:16 am
For a serious proposal, am I overly worried that the photo of Adelaide CBD used as the render is so many years old?
Haha I thought I made it obvious... maybe my photo shopping skills are better than i give myself credit for.
-
HiTouch
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 10:40 pm
#43
Post
by HiTouch » Thu May 24, 2018 12:23 pm
Ben wrote: ↑Thu May 24, 2018 11:23 am
Prodical wrote: ↑Thu May 24, 2018 11:16 am
For a serious proposal, am I overly worried that the photo of Adelaide CBD used as the render is so many years old?
Haha I thought I made it obvious... maybe my photo shopping skills are better than i give myself credit for.
I admit, I thought this was the render for a good 5 minutes.
But it's fair to say that I have a certain level of excitement and confidence for this proposal simply because of confidence in the developer. The specific area of this development will make Adelaide look a lot taller.
-
nath199
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:14 am
#44
Post
by nath199 » Thu May 24, 2018 1:33 pm
How exciting, fingers crossed for this one.
Would love a few metres added to round it at 140m
Then again, anything taller and better than the below is a win. Design has to be spot on.
-
Attachments
-
- currie king william.JPG (121.79 KiB) Viewed 4176 times
-
Mpol03
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am
#45
Post
by Mpol03 » Thu May 24, 2018 1:50 pm
Can they knock down its neighbour and build something new there as well?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: floplo, Google Adsense [Bot] and 9 guests