[COM] 115 King William Street | 91m | 26lvls | Office
[COM]
Yeah I changed the thread titles in both threads, thanks to some info from me ole mate Pantaloons!
-
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:57 am
- Location: Looking over your shoulder
[COM]
These developments look fantastic and lets hope they materialise, however who is going to lease/ occupy this plethora of office space? The cynical side of me says they wont occur unless they pre-lease a fair proportion of the development on a long term lease, pre construction.
Lets hope there are plenty of companies clambering for office space to ensure these projects get built, but me doubts!
Lets hope there are plenty of companies clambering for office space to ensure these projects get built, but me doubts!
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
Yeah would have to assume so, along with their Waymouth St development. I sent them an email like 3 months ago to see what was happening, but never got anything backbeamer85 wrote:Over a year and nothing... dead?
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
These developments were never submitted to the ACC, so I must assume that they never advanced from the 'vision' stage.
But with the current demand for office accomodation, Pascot should give them a chance.
But with the current demand for office accomodation, Pascot should give them a chance.
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
Some one on SSC just posted this:
can't be true as was never submitted to the acc and the amount of floors to the hieght is way off. Just a hoax or anybody know more?guys, this has just got approved this week.
bordex wine racks and displays is one of the tenants, moving from dudley park to this office.
no modifications......16 storeys around 100m.
set for construction early next year
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
Guess we'll have to see if it makes it on the dap agenda next fortnight.
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
Nup, 16 floors and 100m?
No way in hellll!
No way in hellll!
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
16 levels, 100 metres?Pikey wrote:Nup, 16 floors and 100m?
No way in hellll!
A win for the extremelly tall people among us and lots of head room for the rest.
- skyliner
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
- Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
16 floors might take 60m - the rest might be a spire.Seems to me to be some communication issue here. Have to wait and see.
ADELAIDE TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
ADELAIDE TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Last edited by skyliner on Wed Sep 05, 2007 1:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Jack.
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
His reply:
urbansg.....that is wrong. it has gone to the acc this week
this wine comany is partly financing the building with interstate investors.
i know this as the ceo of this company is a very close friend of mine.
you wait and see, there will be a media release very shortly.
i am not sure the exact height proportions, however, the render looks quite tall and i know its a 50million dollar development.
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
Unless, they're taking 16 floors, which would be enough precommitment for construction.
[COM] Re: #Proposed : 115 King William Street - 24 lvl - 90m
I can confirm that the building has not been approved.beamer85 wrote:Some one on SSC just posted this:
can't be true as was never submitted to the acc and the amount of floors to the hieght is way off. Just a hoax or anybody know more?guys, this has just got approved this week.
bordex wine racks and displays is one of the tenants, moving from dudley park to this office.
no modifications......16 storeys around 100m.
set for construction early next year
Maybe the person is confused and rather meant to say that plans were lodged with the ACC. I guess we will have to wait.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 3 guests