ONH: [Port Adelaide] Newport Quays | $1.2b

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#196 Post by Will » Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:36 am

Thanks for the photos Adam! We are definately going to miss your regular photo reports! 8)

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#197 Post by Ho Really » Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:22 am

AtD wrote:With regards to Ethelton Station, I only recently noticed how stupidly close it is to Glanville Station, just 700m. It might be an idea, rather than upgrade these two horrid stations, to build a new station under the Jervois Bridge. This would also eliminate the need for pedestrians to cross the rail line (think Mawson Lakes).

Currently, Port Adelaide Station is 1.4km from Ethelton, which is 0.7km from Glanville, which is 0.8km from Peterhead. If Ethelton and Glanville were moved to under the bridge, the new station would be 1.5km from Port Adelaide and 1.3km from Peterhead. More manageable distances for heavy rail, IMO.
Good thinking, but I'm not sure it would be a good idea closing the Glanville Station. It is in such a strategic position that it gives it room for parking and shuttle services. It will also be in a good position if the government thought about including a tram line from Semaphore Beach to Port Adelaide via a revitalised Birkenhead Bridge. That tram line could go all the way to the old Port Dock woolstores. Just a thought.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#198 Post by Ho Really » Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:25 am

rhino wrote:Great pics Adam. The area needs more trees though, like some palms along the waterfront maybe to start with.
I agree excellent pics AtD.

As for the palm trees, were there any in the project drawings? If not they should have.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#199 Post by AtD » Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:18 pm

Ho Really wrote:Good thinking, but I'm not sure it would be a good idea closing the Glanville Station. It is in such a strategic position that it gives it room for parking and shuttle services.
Glanville station is barely 100m from the bridge. One of the entrances to the car park is under the bridge. Google Maps link

User avatar
Pikey
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2481
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Sitting Down

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#200 Post by Pikey » Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am

From what I could see from west lakes on saturday late arvo, one crane is fully up, and the second tower is at full height. Could be fully up by now.
Walking on over....

| Sensational-Adelaide.com Moderator |

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#201 Post by Ho Really » Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:36 am

AtD wrote:
Ho Really wrote:Good thinking, but I'm not sure it would be a good idea closing the Glanville Station. It is in such a strategic position that it gives it room for parking and shuttle services.
Glanville station is barely 100m from the bridge. One of the entrances to the car park is under the bridge. Google Maps link
Also, if they ever intended to add a tram service along Semaphore Road it would pass right next to the station. The tram service I have in mind should go from Semaphore Beach to Port Adelaide (and maybe up to the Port Dock Station area). They could use the standard gauge line already in place on the side of the road up to the Birkenhead Bridge. Of course the bridge would need work done to it. I think this is an idea they should contemplate when the area is alive with people. That's my suggestion anyway.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#202 Post by AtD » Tue Sep 04, 2007 6:36 pm

It's a ridiculous idea to replace heavy rail with light rail. It's going backwards, even with the state of heavy rail in this city.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#203 Post by Norman » Tue Sep 04, 2007 6:47 pm

AtD wrote:It's a ridiculous idea to replace heavy rail with light rail. It's going backwards, even with the state of heavy rail in this city.
Sure, we need heavy rail to Seaford, Belair, Gawler, but not Port Adelaide. That area was MADE for trams.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#204 Post by AtD » Tue Sep 04, 2007 6:56 pm

Perhaps, but Port Adelaide is just the half-way mark on the Outer Harbor line.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#205 Post by Ho Really » Wed Sep 05, 2007 12:53 am

AtD wrote:It's a ridiculous idea to replace heavy rail with light rail. It's going backwards, even with the state of heavy rail in this city.
My idea is not to replace heavy rail to Port Adelaide from the city. Doubling up with light rail is to me a waste of money. I'm suggesting a tram line from Semaphore Beach to Port Adelaide. It would have tourist value. Whether it went anywhere else I don't know. It could even go to Football Park and the West Lakes Mall if there were to be demand. I don't know. My overall idea is for a Port Dock station revival. I am hoping the surrounding area will be revitalised with apartments. I'm not sure how many of the woolstores have become or will become apartments, but if the overall population in that area were to grow it would be nice for that station to be reinstated into the network. Express trains could go from there to the city, etc. If the line through Rosewater were to be used people could go from the Port Dock to Gawler (or even the Barossa) and vice versa. Just ideas.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

Professor
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 469
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: Solomon Islands

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#206 Post by Professor » Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:16 pm

The two Multiplex cranes are now installed at the new Port development and it looks pretty good now. About 8-10 levels by the height of the cranes. Could not get a photo as it was dark when I drove past tonight.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#207 Post by AtD » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:27 pm

Said cranes:
Image

North tower:
Image

South Tower:
Image

From Fisherman's Warf:
Image

UrbanSG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:55 am

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#208 Post by UrbanSG » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:51 pm

Great pics AtD. Those cranes are fairly large. I hope we get to see a few of them around The Precinct site too soon :D

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#209 Post by crawf » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:51 pm

Great pics!

Adelaides crane count is now at least *drum rolls* - 8! :D

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#210 Post by Will » Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:30 pm

crawf wrote:Great pics!

Adelaides crane count is now at least *drum rolls* - 8! :D
Its actually 9. 8)

2 at Port Adelaide, 2 at Flinders, and 5 in the city.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests