Good question. I thought the bus could enter the intersection with its "B" priority light and cross into the tram right of way, but then realised the bus would have to stop in its little lane at the intersection and wait for the next change of lights for this to be activated. This would then hold the bus up, and be counter productive to its free right of way ie no real time saving. Also presumably at present the tram is free to go also when the bus has priority , but the tram would have to wait for the bus. It is a bit messy.
News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
- 1NEEDS2POST
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:01 pm
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
We shouldn't be running so many buses parallel to the tram line in the first place. Most of those routes should terminate at the closest tram stop or railway station.Eurostar wrote: ↑Wed Nov 14, 2018 5:32 pmThe bus lane on Anzac Highway was a good idea. The Government should look into replicating it on other roads.
- Port Road between Hindmarsh and RAH
- Dequetteville Terrace between Rundle Road and Brittania Roundabout
- Glen Osmond Road between South Terrace and Greenhill Road
- Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3827
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
- Contact:
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
Exactly. I wonder then if the reason then for the concreted track rather than open ballast was because they were anticipating the NRAH and that it would be able to take more than just the occasional emergency vehicle. Then again, I'm probably giving someone too much credit.claybro wrote: ↑Thu Nov 15, 2018 4:44 pmGood question. I thought the bus could enter the intersection with its "B" priority light and cross into the tram right of way, but then realised the bus would have to stop in its little lane at the intersection and wait for the next change of lights for this to be activated. This would then hold the bus up, and be counter productive to its free right of way ie no real time saving. Also presumably at present the tram is free to go also when the bus has priority , but the tram would have to wait for the bus. It is a bit messy.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
Code: Select all
I assume they would use the tram stops, so wouldn't need to weave and merge.
- Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3827
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
- Contact:
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
Obviously. I was thinking more about entering the and exiting the tram corridor at the ends.rubberman wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 8:47 amCode: Select all
I assume they would use the tram stops, so wouldn't need to weave and merge.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2148
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
- Location: Christies Beach
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
How congested are those routes? Anzac Highway effectively ends in a convergence (with Goodwood Road) so there is a significant bottleneck, whereas the ends of your examples are more divergent.1NEEDS2POST wrote:Eurostar wrote: ↑Wed Nov 14, 2018 5:32 pmThe bus lane on Anzac Highway was a good idea. The Government should look into replicating it on other roads.
- Port Road between Hindmarsh and RAH
- Dequetteville Terrace between Rundle Road and Brittania Roundabout
- Glen Osmond Road between South Terrace and Greenhill Road
WRONG! The buses need to run where the passengers want to go. When the trains and trams go where the passengers want to go, some more of the outer suburban buses should be able to avoid running into the City. But even then, the inner suburban routes shouldn't avoid the biggest destination!We shouldn't be running so many buses parallel to the tram line in the first place. Most of those routes should terminate at the closest tram stop or railway station.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2148
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
- Location: Christies Beach
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
Most of our tram stops have platforms on the right, whereas the buses all have doors on the left. Not that we'd want buses clogging up our tramways anyway.rubberman wrote:I assume they would use the tram stops, so wouldn't need to weave and merge.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
Port Road can be bad for traffic jams during peak hours and you got multiple bus services sharing the corridor I.e. 110, 112, 117, 118, 150, 157, 157X, 286, 288.How congested are those routes? Anzac Highway effectively ends in a convergence (with Goodwood Road) so there is a significant bottleneck, whereas the ends of your examples are more divergent.
A bus lane will reduce delays for bus commuters.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
Amateur design and poor planning are no reason for taking an extra lane off motorists. Redo the tram stops so they can take buses, not take a lane off motorists because the tram corridor design was faulty. BTW, that could be achieved by repairing the King William Street South track, rather than replacing it, as is done in Melbourne in identical situations. Joints rewelded, corrugations ground off by grinder, loose rail sections repacked with grout and reconcreted. Cheap and quick, with no disturbance to traffic and shops because it can be done overnight.
- Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
I can't see how Port Road buses (and there are a lot) can use the tram corridor and stops without negatively impacting the running of trams - especially if frequencies increase in future and/or the line is extended to Outer Harbor, Grange Road, West lakes (delete as applicable).
The tram to the city is slow enough already without having to sit behind buses - it is already noticeably slower between the nRAH and the Railway Station with trams servicing two routes running on the same track.
Slow down the trams and clog their reserved corridor with buses and that's half of the attraction of trams gone.
The tram to the city is slow enough already without having to sit behind buses - it is already noticeably slower between the nRAH and the Railway Station with trams servicing two routes running on the same track.
Slow down the trams and clog their reserved corridor with buses and that's half of the attraction of trams gone.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
I find it quite sad when people say Adelaide can't do things that other cities manage quite easily. Munich, Krakow, Warsaw, Ostrava all do this with far busier tram services. Apparently Adelaide can't work it out.Llessur2002 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 17, 2018 10:40 pmI can't see how Port Road buses (and there are a lot) can use the tram corridor and stops without negatively impacting the running of trams - especially if frequencies increase in future and/or the line is extended to Outer Harbor, Grange Road, West lakes (delete as applicable).
The tram to the city is slow enough already without having to sit behind buses - it is already noticeably slower between the nRAH and the Railway Station with trams servicing two routes running on the same track.
Slow down the trams and clog their reserved corridor with buses and that's half of the attraction of trams gone.
I'm not sure what the source of this inferiority complex is. Sure, we may not have thought of it first, but if these other cities can do it, I am sure Adelaide can. Let's not think of oursrlves as less capable than others. If necessary, send our people over to these places, or get some of their people to come as consultants.
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
In my opinion its time King William Street between North Terrace and Victoria Square be turned into a transit mall
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
Some major new traffic engineering would be required for that! Main North Road and Prospect Road feed straight into O'Connell Street, and some time in history King William Road was cut across the southern bit of North Adelaide to feed them onto King William Street.
Even allowing for the assumption that King William Street should not be regarded as a shortest path between Prospect/Medindie and Wayville/Unley, where would you propose to move traffic that usually traverses that section with an origin or destination in the City of Adelaide? Morphett Street/Montefiore Road/Ward Street and Frome Street/Frome Road/Lefevre Terrace routes would both need some fairly serious upgrades that would destroy their character even further.
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
Even now, most of the traffic in KWS does not need to be there. Most major cities in the world have taken serious measures to prevent private vehicles entering the heart of their CBD's. Adelaides problem is the lack of cohesive inner ring routes. You are quite right, that Main North road almost funnels traffic directly into KWS, and this should not be the case. The Southern end of KWS demonstrates this perfectly, as its suburban extension peters out into a dead end a few kilometres out of the city, rather than continue as a major arterial road, and therefore the South end of KWS is usually quiet.SBD wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:33 pmSome major new traffic engineering would be required for that! Main North Road and Prospect Road feed straight into O'Connell Street, and some time in history King William Road was cut across the southern bit of North Adelaide to feed them onto King William Street.
Even allowing for the assumption that King William Street should not be regarded as a shortest path between Prospect/Medindie and Wayville/Unley, where would you propose to move traffic that usually traverses that section with an origin or destination in the City of Adelaide? Morphett Street/Montefiore Road/Ward Street and Frome Street/Frome Road/Lefevre Terrace routes would both need some fairly serious upgrades that would destroy their character even further.
Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Buses
The southern feeder roads lead primarily to Pulteney Street and West Terrace, neither of which continue directly across the Torrens. The Adelaide Bridge on King William Road is the obvious route from the northern suburbs into the city centre, and has been for over 100 years since KWR and O'Connell Street were lined up in front of the cathedral, and reinforced by Bonython Hall being strategically positioned to prevent Pulteney Street continuing to North Adelaide.
The goal of calming traffic in northern King WIlliam Street might be achieved without actually banning it by re-doing the North Adelaide routes to feed into the Montefiore and Frome Road bridges. This would also reduce traffic on O'Connell Street.
The goal of calming traffic in northern King WIlliam Street might be achieved without actually banning it by re-doing the North Adelaide routes to feed into the Montefiore and Frome Road bridges. This would also reduce traffic on O'Connell Street.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests