[COM] 269 North Terrace | 119m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
Prodical
Legendary Member!
Posts: 603
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 5:10 pm

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#241 Post by Prodical » Wed Dec 05, 2018 5:44 pm

Hmmm... I now have more sympathy for Samaras. The dumbing down / degrading in appearance of this building will probably reduce the value of the Adelaidean apartments, now that concrete replaces glass and the floor heights compressed to squeeze in even more small rooms. A real pity that this building has taken this significant turn for the worse.

Mpol03
Legendary Member!
Posts: 759
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#242 Post by Mpol03 » Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:54 pm

Hang on where are the concrete panels being placed? All along one side or levels 24-26?

User avatar
Pikey
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2492
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Sitting Down

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 34 Levels | Student accommodation

#243 Post by Pikey » Wed Dec 05, 2018 8:10 pm

Ben wrote:
Fri Apr 06, 2018 2:30 pm
Amended plans on DAC site for upcoming meeting for which it is expected to be approved this time.

https://www.saplanningcommission.sa.gov ... hments.pdf

New renders including Adelaidean.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
I'm looking at these renders trying to make sense of the amendments submitted, particularly the materiality piece with the precast from glass... reading the amendment I'm wondering if the materiality change refers to the podium, centre and crown?
Walking on over....

| Sensational-Adelaide.com Moderator |

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6424
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#244 Post by rev » Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:14 am

I can’t spot much if anything different in the podium between the renders on page 2 and those new ones above.

But geez the two buildings are going to be mighty close to each other. Was this site earmarked for a high rise development before Adelaidian started?
I also don’t see how this monstrosity of a building fits in with the “cultural” landscape of North terrace.
You can see why they’re pissed about it, when much nicer developments have been knocked back(that one on the former club site near gawler place for example), for such reasons, and then this turd gets approved.

User avatar
Algernon
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:46 pm
Location: Moravia

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 34 Levels | Student accommodation

#245 Post by Algernon » Thu Dec 06, 2018 4:44 am

Nort wrote:
Wed Dec 05, 2018 4:49 pm
I'm laughing at the idea of concrete precast panels that are a "similar colour" to the originally proposed glass.
The DA specifies two different glazing types - "grey" and "spandrel" (which is grey).

So, I suppose offering concrete of a "similar" colour is doable. :lol: If you completely disregard that whole glass reflecting the blue sky thing.

The windows are set a metre or so into the facade, so by no means would it look like an uninterrupted blank concrete wall. Potentially shithouse, but not an uninterrupted blank concrete wall.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7574
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#246 Post by Ben » Thu Dec 06, 2018 9:14 am

rev wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:14 am
I can’t spot much if anything different in the podium between the renders on page 2 and those new ones above.
They're not new renders Rev, Pikey just reposted them, so i would be worried if you did notice any differences.

EBG
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3142
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:49 pm

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#247 Post by EBG » Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:41 pm

Demolition of the site is proceeding quite fast, ( not that there was much to demolish). Picture 8/12/2018.
Attachments
20181208_Stud aps.jpg
20181208_Stud aps.jpg (413.82 KiB) Viewed 5327 times

Ser Noit of Loit
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:12 pm

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#248 Post by Ser Noit of Loit » Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:44 pm

rev wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:14 am
I can’t spot much if anything different in the podium between the renders on page 2 and those new ones above.

But geez the two buildings are going to be mighty close to each other. Was this site earmarked for a high rise development before Adelaidian started?
I also don’t see how this monstrosity of a building fits in with the “cultural” landscape of North terrace.
You can see why they’re pissed about it, when much nicer developments have been knocked back(that one on the former club site near gawler place for example), for such reasons, and then this turd gets approved.
Yes, why are two of our new tallest buildings in the city crammed next to each other? Okay I know why, different developers of the properties, they both wanted to build something which was tall and they were both approved.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6424
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#249 Post by rev » Sat Dec 08, 2018 11:58 pm

Ser Noit of Loit wrote:
Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:44 pm
rev wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:14 am
I can’t spot much if anything different in the podium between the renders on page 2 and those new ones above.

But geez the two buildings are going to be mighty close to each other. Was this site earmarked for a high rise development before Adelaidian started?
I also don’t see how this monstrosity of a building fits in with the “cultural” landscape of North terrace.
You can see why they’re pissed about it, when much nicer developments have been knocked back(that one on the former club site near gawler place for example), for such reasons, and then this turd gets approved.
Yes, why are two of our new tallest buildings in the city crammed next to each other? Okay I know why, different developers of the properties, they both wanted to build something which was tall and they were both approved.
Yeh what now?

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2723
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#250 Post by SBD » Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:57 am

Ser Noit of Loit wrote:
Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:44 pm
rev wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:14 am
I can’t spot much if anything different in the podium between the renders on page 2 and those new ones above.

But geez the two buildings are going to be mighty close to each other. Was this site earmarked for a high rise development before Adelaidian started?
I also don’t see how this monstrosity of a building fits in with the “cultural” landscape of North terrace.
You can see why they’re pissed about it, when much nicer developments have been knocked back(that one on the former club site near gawler place for example), for such reasons, and then this turd gets approved.
Yes, why are two of our new tallest buildings in the city crammed next to each other? Okay I know why, different developers of the properties, they both wanted to build something which was tall and they were both approved.
Adelaide's two tallest buildings in 1987 were also fairly close to each other - Telstra House is not far from the Grenfell Centre. By the time this is built, Realm will be taller, so less concentration at this end.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2721
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#251 Post by Ho Really » Sun Dec 09, 2018 6:37 pm

rev wrote:
Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:14 am
I can’t spot much if anything different in the podium between the renders on page 2 and those new ones above.

But geez the two buildings are going to be mighty close to each other. Was this site earmarked for a high rise development before Adelaidian started?
I also don’t see how this monstrosity of a building fits in with the “cultural” landscape of North terrace.
You can see why they’re pissed about it, when much nicer developments have been knocked back(that one on the former club site near gawler place for example), for such reasons, and then this turd gets approved.
They obviously knew something was going to be built on the old church site that's why the tower is set back on the podium. What they probably didn't know was the height of the student accommodation building or whatever else was going to be built there. Yes, it doesn't win any design prizes. It's still better than Dwell and some others though.

Now those on the north face of Adelaidean can enjoy protection from hot winds during summer.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
AndyWelsh
Legendary Member!
Posts: 787
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:44 pm

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#252 Post by AndyWelsh » Wed Dec 19, 2018 12:54 pm

From today:

Image

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2296
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#253 Post by Nort » Wed Dec 19, 2018 1:42 pm

That demolition isn't wasting any time!

Mpol03
Legendary Member!
Posts: 759
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#254 Post by Mpol03 » Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:19 pm

Looks like Samaras is clearly wasting his time.

normh
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2018 4:19 pm

[COM] Re: 269 North Terrace | 118m | 36 Levels | Student accommodation

#255 Post by normh » Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:49 pm

Well it appears to have stopped, I was there today and appears nothing else has happened since Andy’s last post.Image
Image


Sent from my iPad

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests