News & Discussion: Low/Mid-Rise CBD Development

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2721
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#391 Post by Ho Really » Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:07 am

bmw boy wrote:...I can see such developements becoming the future of the south western area of the CBD... which I am all for.
Towards West Terrace or did you mean south eastern corner?

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
bmw boy
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 461
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:45 am

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#392 Post by bmw boy » Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:13 am

Ho Really wrote:
bmw boy wrote:...I can see such developements becoming the future of the south western area of the CBD... which I am all for.
Towards West Terrace or did you mean south eastern corner?

Cheers
hmm well along south terrace ... and also in the inner areas behind sth tce and west tce corner region... sturt st, whitmore sq etc

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#393 Post by crawf » Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:06 am

Agreed. It was a strange feeling walking from the busy inner CBD core to very quiet south western part of the CBD, felt like I was back in the suburbs.

However there are two fenced of blocks on Sturt St (one on the cnr of Whitmore Square). BTW Whitmore Square is very nice and has plenty of potential (like most things in Adelaide), but currently its very underdeveloped.

It would be the least developed square in the city.

User avatar
bmw boy
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 461
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:45 am

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#394 Post by bmw boy » Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:10 am

crawf wrote:Agreed. It was strange feeling walking from the busy inner CBD core to very quiet south western part of the CBD, felt like I was back in the suburbs.

However there are two fenced of blocks on Sturt St (one on the cnr of Whitmore Square). BTW Whitmore Square is very nice and has plenty of potential (like most things in Adelaide), but currently its very underdeveloped.

It would be the least developed square in the city.
lets not let this 'general developement' thread go onto a tangent ... but yer i think the unattratciveness of the sq and the presence of all the homeless people and shelters in the area is not a very appealing aspect...

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#395 Post by crawf » Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:19 am

^Plus a power substation

sidler
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:27 pm

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#396 Post by sidler » Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:01 pm

crawf wrote:However there are two fenced of blocks on Sturt St (one on the cnr of Whitmore Square). BTW Whitmore Square is very nice and has plenty of potential (like most things in Adelaide), but currently its very underdeveloped.

It would be the least developed square in the city.
The block on the corner of Whitmore Square is soon to be developed into mid rise sustainable housing project. I think Troppo architects have won the right to develop this site and if there past work is anything to go by this should turn out really nice.

We should be seeing some concept designs for this one soon!

urban
Legendary Member!
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:59 am
Location: City of Unley

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#397 Post by urban » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:59 am

The Whitmore Sq project was the subject of a national design competition in 2005 I think. Troppo won the competition. They released revised design drawings for a construction management tender about 6 months ago. Last I heard ACC & the State Govt were fighting about funding. The design for this project is absolutely 1st class and provides an adelaide specific interpretation of urban living.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#398 Post by rhino » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:14 am

urban wrote: an adelaide specific interpretation of urban living.
Can you expand on this? Not quite sure what you mean. Specific to the Whitmore Square location or specific to Adelaide's situation?
cheers,
Rhino

urban
Legendary Member!
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:59 am
Location: City of Unley

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#399 Post by urban » Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:09 pm

Rhino,

Initially specific to Whitmore Square but because Whitmore square has buildings representative of traditional Adelaide suburbia the design characteristics could be easily transferred to North Adelaide and the inner suburbs.

I think their design provides medium to high density living in a low-density environment without dominating the streetscape. They have achieved this by using traditional domestic building materials and elements without resorting to imitation and mimicry. The scale of the different elements remains domestic and picks up on the existing rhythm of development around the square. Unlike the bus station low-cost housing the occupants of this project will have good solar access and cross ventilation allowing them to take advantage of the views which will be available to them. All this without the need for artificial heating and cooling for much of the year.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#400 Post by rhino » Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:34 pm

Thanks Urban. I'd love to see a render of their proposal. Is there one somewhere?
cheers,
Rhino

urban
Legendary Member!
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:59 am
Location: City of Unley

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#401 Post by urban » Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:58 pm

It used to be on the SA Tenders website but has been removed. I haven't been able to find it anywhere else on the internet. They have some good images of their completed projects on their website http://www.troppoarchitects.com.au/

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7577
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#402 Post by Ben » Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:03 pm

[quote="Howie

Image[/quote]

This is up for pulic consultation already.
Application No:
DA/0551/2007

Address:
121-130 West Terrace, ADELAIDE 5000

Nature of Development:
Demolish existing buildings and construct an 8 level commercial building consisting of ground floor retail, commercial tenancies and carparking.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5869
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#403 Post by Will » Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:13 pm

Will wrote:
beamer85 wrote:It may well not be, but i'd imagine that was constructed before height restrictions were as enforced and restrictive as they are these days, but that could well be a case for them should this stumble at the approval stage.
From memory, I think that height restrictions along West Terrace are 28m. This building appears to be a few metres above that, so I don't think that there will be any problems.
According to the plans this building will be 29.25m tall, so that's just 1.25m above the height retriction.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5869
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#404 Post by Will » Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:07 pm

This was lodged with the ACC on 27/08/07

To demolish existing buildings at 231-235 Waymouth Street and construct a mixed use development comprising basement car parking, ground level commercial tenancies and various residential dwellings. No mention on the number of floors, but this development is expected to cost $23 million. The development has been categorised as Category 2.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6490
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Low to Mid-Rise CBD Development

#405 Post by Norman » Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:06 am

Howie wrote:Image
Looks alright, will look a lot better than the current Liqurland and (AFAIK) CMI Toyota Car Yard.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 6 guests