ONH: [Port Adelaide] Newport Quays | $1.2b
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
Yeah but the ones at Flinders don't have cabs on top so they don't count.
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
9 sounds better than 7AtD wrote:Yeah but the ones at Flinders don't have cabs on top so they don't count.
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
Walked through there today and must say it looks very, very posh.
Mark my words Port Adelaide will one day be better then Glenelg!!!
Will be going through again this week with my camera to show you all
Mark my words Port Adelaide will one day be better then Glenelg!!!
Will be going through again this week with my camera to show you all
- jimmy_2486
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:28 pm
- Location: Glenelg-Marion Area
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
Ha Ha Ha....you reckon?Cruise Control wrote:Walked through there today and must say it looks very, very posh.
Mark my words Port Adelaide will one day be better then Glenelg!!!
Will be going through again this week with my camera to show you all
I cant see that happening.
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
I had a different impression of the area that's now open. Away from the water, I thought it was a bit tacky. The car parks really ruin the area IMO, they could have at least given them a facade.Cruise Control wrote:Walked through there today and must say it looks very, very posh.
Mark my words Port Adelaide will one day be better then Glenelg!!!
Will be going through again this week with my camera to show you all
The water front was nice though.
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
Well it does have more to offer than Glenelg (once the redevelopment is complete and the new defence precinct is in operation), also its just next door to Semaphore.jimmy_2486 wrote:Ha Ha Ha....you reckon?Cruise Control wrote:Walked through there today and must say it looks very, very posh.
Mark my words Port Adelaide will one day be better then Glenelg!!!
Will be going through again this week with my camera to show you all
I cant see that happening.
Though Glenelg is pretty popular place to be these days, so it will be interesting to see.
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
Admittedly, I only walked along the water front, and dive along the road betwwen the two tall building and the train stationAtD wrote:I had a different impression of the area that's now open. Away from the water, I thought it was a bit tacky. The car parks really ruin the area IMO, they could have at least given them a facade.Cruise Control wrote:Walked through there today and must say it looks very, very posh.
Mark my words Port Adelaide will one day be better then Glenelg!!!
Will be going through again this week with my camera to show you all
The water front was nice though.
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
EDIT: POST SHIFTED, CAN THIS ONE BE DELTED PLEASE?
Last edited by Will409 on Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
You might want to post that in the relevant thread and remove it from here. This is a project thread for the apartments.
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
From the Advertiser
Whoa, this is really going to change the Port...THREE apartment buildings – one partially over the Port River – will make up the next stage of Newport Quays if approved by the State Government.
The third stage in the Port Adelaide waterfront redevelopment, worth $250 million, would be made up of about 400 new homes and a 100-berth marina and valet boat parking facility.
Plans were lodged on Wednesday with Planning SA's Development Assessment Commission.
Newport Quays Consortium spokesman Todd Brown described the new apartment building designs as "iconic".
"In a striking architectural statement by architects Woodhead and Denton Corker Marshall, one of these stunning apartment buildings will literally float right over the Port Adelaide River creating a truly iconic landmark for the Port Adelaide inner harbour," he said.
The third stage in the $2 billion Newport Quays project, being developed by joint venture partners Urban Construct and Multiplex Living, would take two years to build.
More than 3000 people have registered an interest in the precinct, which would be SA's largest single stage release.
In addition to the three apartment complexes, the proposal incorporates a cluster of three-storey villas, each of which would have a private marina berth.
There will also be home office accommodation available, as well as cafes and restaurants, a waterfront public plaza for community events and three public jetties.
"Stage three is about new frontiers and about creating a truly landmark form for Port Adelaide, encapsulating the spectacular water views along the entire vista of the Port Adelaide River," Mr Brown said.
The release follows the near completion of stage one, known as Edgewater. Stage two, Marina Cove, is under construction
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
That looks very interesting, hanging over the river like that. Now we're talking serious density.
Do you mind if I copy-pasta the above to SSC?
Do you mind if I copy-pasta the above to SSC?
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
WOW! that looks spectacular!
It is a vast improvement over the current industrial, post-apocalyptic wasteland.
It is a vast improvement over the current industrial, post-apocalyptic wasteland.
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
Looks very Miami, though in a good way...Pistol78 wrote:From the Advertiser
.
Last edited by SRW on Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Keep Adelaide Weird
Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion
I count 10 floors on the over-hang tower, suspended by structural columns about 2/2.5 floors above ground - and a plantroom atop = 13/13.5 levels. I don't know what this equates height-wise, but 40-50m is about right?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests