This is tall enough for its own thread, isn't it?wilkiebarkid wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:13 pmNot sure if this has been posted before. From Maras Group website. Proposed 361-367 King William Street (corner of Sturt Street). 18 floors of offices over 4 levels of carparking.
News & Discussion: General CBD Development
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
I noticed the facade on the AON Centre Pirie Street was being treated this morning.
- gnrc_louis
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:04 pm
- Location: Adelaide
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
Reasonable sized townhouse development at 245-259 Gilbert St: https://www.saplanningportal.sa.gov.au/ ... 069-19.pdf
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
Saw this. I personally think it’s underwhelming for the cbd. I know it’s predominantly residential area but surely we can do better than townhouses in the cbd.gnrc_louis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:26 pmReasonable sized townhouse development at 245-259 Gilbert St: https://www.saplanningportal.sa.gov.au/ ... 069-19.pdf
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
It’s the far SW corner of the CBD near South and West Tce. Seems fine to me.Ben wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:32 pmSaw this. I personally think it’s underwhelming for the cbd. I know it’s predominantly residential area but surely we can do better than townhouses in the cbd.gnrc_louis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:26 pmReasonable sized townhouse development at 245-259 Gilbert St: https://www.saplanningportal.sa.gov.au/ ... 069-19.pdf
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
Agreed, the scale is fine for the area. The actual CBD is blocks away, and nearby South Terrace is zoned for greater heights. The only problem I have with this is the number of vehicle crossovers on the Vinrace St frontage -- I know they've oriented the dwellings to face north on the access lane, but it sucks for other users of the public street.ml69 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 3:11 pmIt’s the far SW corner of the CBD near South and West Tce. Seems fine to me.Ben wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:32 pmSaw this. I personally think it’s underwhelming for the cbd. I know it’s predominantly residential area but surely we can do better than townhouses in the cbd.gnrc_louis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:26 pmReasonable sized townhouse development at 245-259 Gilbert St: https://www.saplanningportal.sa.gov.au/ ... 069-19.pdf
Keep Adelaide Weird
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
Just noticed today demolition is almost finished on the building on West Terrace between Rydges and Jarvis Subaru dealership.
Can't even recall what was there before, any idea on what what might be getting built there?
Can't even recall what was there before, any idea on what what might be getting built there?
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
Not the catalyst development I think most of us were hoping for....
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
What a joke, surely there are planning regulations that somehow stipulate what is now deemed appropriate use for a CBD site? A lot of people harp on in Adelaide about desire for more development in this city, and by result our planning commission in conjunction with the state government will allow for heritage buildings to pay the price to progress, meanwhile this kind of shit remains standing and is repurposed... Where is the sense?
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
What a joke. Great opportunity for urban infill high density living, retail etc but we get a STORAGE SHACK
- timtam20292
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:03 pm
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
I totally agree. It possibly also says a lot that the highest bidder (maybe only bidder!) was a storage company. Maybe a combination of the banks new credit policies, economic times and the developers (esp. Chinese) putting the cue in the rack?
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
Agree. If the planning system allows for local heritage listings to be (rightly or wrongly) removed/ignored, then there should equally be mechanisms in place to discourage this sort of thing.Patrick_27 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 5:47 pmWhat a joke, surely there are planning regulations that somehow stipulate what is now deemed appropriate use for a CBD site? A lot of people harp on in Adelaide about desire for more development in this city, and by result our planning commission in conjunction with the state government will allow for heritage buildings to pay the price to progress, meanwhile this kind of shit remains standing and is repurposed... Where is the sense?
Very poor outcome for 'the largest freehold development site.. sold in many years,' especially when there are plenty of sites perfect for this sort of development just down the road at Keswick or Mile End South.
- Ho Really
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2721
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
- Location: In your head
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
Hope this helps...
Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2780
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development
A good read on the (in progress) revitalisation of Adelaide Railway Station.
https://renewalsa.sa.gov.au/revival-of-a-heritage-icon/
https://renewalsa.sa.gov.au/revival-of-a-heritage-icon/
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 12 guests