Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
Spotto
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm
#4966
Post
by Spotto » Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:11 am
crawf wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 10:38 pm
Once complete, I think they should ditch the generic "North-South" and rename it after something that represents Adelaide. Maybe the "Kauna Motorway"..... just a suggestion.
I’d certainly love to see it get a proper name, “North-South” is apt but very generic.
I think a good time to rename it would be when R2P opens and the currently built sections will finally be one continuous motorway from Hindmarsh to Virginia. Renaming it then will give people time to adjust to the new name by the time that the final T2D section is eventually opened.
-
AG
- VIP Member
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
- Location: Adelaide SA
#4967
Post
by AG » Fri Nov 13, 2020 1:51 pm
how good is he wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 11:53 pm
I am just curious why they wouldn't have just continued the tunnel in the middle as its only some 2-3kms? They could have joined stages 1&2 by tunnel to save a lot of above ground disruption to traffic while its being built (as well as property resumptions etc).
So that drivers not driving the full length of South Road can still enter and exit the motorway.
From a technical perspective, two shorter tunnels is much easier to manage then one long tunnel. The cost of providing the exhaust systems and fire protection to service the tunnel grows significantly in one long tunnel compared to shorter tunnels.
-
aceman
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:02 am
- Location: Adelaide (Hallett Cove)
#4968
Post
by aceman » Fri Nov 13, 2020 2:50 pm
why not just call it the 'M2'??
-
mrumley02
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2020 10:08 pm
#4969
Post
by mrumley02 » Fri Nov 13, 2020 3:02 pm
aceman wrote:why not just call it the 'M2'??
Why would you call them the M2 and A9 when you’ve got great names like NEXY, SEXY, and PREXY?
-
Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
#4970
Post
by Llessur2002 » Fri Nov 13, 2020 3:17 pm
I think the road name has been discussed before but I'm not convinced the Kaurna people would want their name associated with what is essentially a giant scar across the Adelaide Plains.
-
shiftaling
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Modbury
#4971
Post
by shiftaling » Fri Nov 13, 2020 5:12 pm
It's not a hill I will die to defend but I kind of like Adelaide's penchant for non-descript "directional" road names heh
-
bits
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 831
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:24 pm
#4972
Post
by bits » Sat Nov 14, 2020 8:11 am
What's more Australian than using a description to name something?
Red belly black snake, red back spider, bottleshop, etc.
-
[Shuz]
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3301
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
#4973
Post
by [Shuz] » Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:49 am
Rollercoaster Freeway.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
-
SBD
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2723
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
- Location: Blakeview
#4974
Post
by SBD » Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:30 pm
[Shuz] wrote: ↑Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:49 am
Rollercoaster Freeway.
Does anyone really get sick from the undulations in T2T and Superway? The Southern Expressway has much bigger hills by following the topography. I don't know why they are on the Superway, but I imagine the trenches are easier to manage stormwater with a few places to pump out from. The Northern Connector is fairly flat, and the Northern Expressway has two "bumps" for bridges over the railway line and Gawler River. Nobody really complains about going
under Anzac Highway then
over Cross Road either.
-
Spotto
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm
#4975
Post
by Spotto » Sat Nov 14, 2020 9:59 pm
SBD wrote: ↑Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:30 pm
Does anyone really get sick from the undulations in T2T and Superway?
My first time on it I was like “ok it’s a little bit up and a little bit down” but it’s barely noticeable, especially now.
-
NTRabbit
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:00 pm
#4976
Post
by NTRabbit » Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:55 pm
Nort wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 6:09 pm
croweater888 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 4:04 pm
http://hansardpublic.parliament.sa.gov. ... D-10-31302
The Hon. F. PANGALLO (15:14): Can the Treasurer categorically rule out that the government, or a future Liberal government, will not introduce road tolls to help pay for the north-south project, even if it exceeds the $8 billion or $9 billion budget, which the Treasurer today hinted could happen, and that he doesn't get additional funding from the federal government if it does blow out?
The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:14): Yes.
I fully expect the tunnels to be tolled, and since the surface road will be staying it seems pretty fair tbh.
I think the abundance of alternative parallel routes, up to and including the B road, means there's zero chance of it being tolled. As soon as it becomes a toll road everyone will stop using it, and the toll company starts losing money. It's been brought up before, and is why none of the toll companies in the Eastern states have been willing to stump up additional cash public-private style to get the road built in exchange for the toll contract.
-
Mr Smith
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:41 pm
- Location: Parkside Lunatic Asylum
#4977
Post
by Mr Smith » Sun Nov 15, 2020 8:52 am
[Shuz] wrote: ↑Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:49 am
Rollercoaster Freeway.
Speaking of the rollercoaster effect. Anyone got an insights on how the section between southern end of T2T and West Thebarton Rd will be achieved. The area where the Taylor Bridge is looks way too narrow to accomodate an at grade solution surely?
-
ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2764
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
-
Contact:
#4978
Post
by ChillyPhilly » Sun Nov 15, 2020 10:27 am
Mr Smith wrote:[Shuz] wrote: ↑Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:49 am
Rollercoaster Freeway.
Speaking of the rollercoaster effect. Anyone got an insights on how the section between southern end of T2T and West Thebarton Rd will be achieved. The area where the Taylor Bridge is looks way too narrow to accomodate an at grade solution surely?
Labor envisioned a new, elevated structure. This would be interesting given the potential gradient between the southern end of the T2T trench and the climb required to get up and over this hypothetical structure.
I would say that Urbanstone Central would be acquired, so we'll probably see the structure to the west of the current road.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
-
NTRabbit
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:00 pm
#4979
Post
by NTRabbit » Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:48 am
Even with Urbanstone gone I don't see how they can stay at grade and keep both the cemetery and the brickworks, the turn would be too tight
-
aceman
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:02 am
- Location: Adelaide (Hallett Cove)
#4980
Post
by aceman » Sun Nov 15, 2020 9:20 pm
NTRabbit wrote: ↑Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:48 am
Even with Urbanstone gone I don't see how they can stay at grade and keep both the cemetery and the brickworks, the turn would be too tight
is it actually wide enough in that section to have 3 lanes each way plus the surface roads as well?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 6 guests