[SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
NTRabbit
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 389
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:00 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#751 Post by NTRabbit » Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:51 am

Yeah it looks like they shrank the footprint considerably, the government must have plans for the back half of the block currently occupied in the renders by a nondescript grass area.

bits
Legendary Member!
Posts: 831
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:24 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#752 Post by bits » Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:55 am

Love it, can we really build it?

Mpol02
Legendary Member!
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:06 am

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#753 Post by Mpol02 » Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:20 am

If the ADL university redevelopment happens, north terrace will be quite the place for some great design.

Bob
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:16 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#754 Post by Bob » Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:35 am

The proposed building itself is unique but it needs to be positioned back from North Terrace.

Additionally, the theme of a consistent plane tree lined boulevard on the northern side of North Terrace will be broken due to this building being too close and their proposal to put native shrubs and pools up to the footpath.

This section of the footpath will be very hot in summer and disconnecting the Botantic Garden from the usual street trees that line North Terrace on that side if their planned native landscape theme goes ahead.

The eastern frontage of the Botantic Garden (Hackney Road), tried this native landscaping format, it looks shocking, is impractical, is very hot in summer. and does not entice visitors with a good entry feel.

We are in danger of making a blunder here with both the buildings position on the plot and the landscaping out the front, the proposed landscaping and associated water features could easily be moved to the rear of the building, or in the courtyard of the building, or stay at the front if the building is moved back.

Listy
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 11:07 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#755 Post by Listy » Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:36 pm

Mpol02 wrote:
Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:20 am
If the ADL university redevelopment happens, north terrace will be quite the place for some great design.
That seems unlikely, last year Adelaide Uni comprehensively shelved any infrastructure development for the next 5-10 years, aside from urgent maintenance.

User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 753
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#756 Post by Spotto » Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:04 pm

Listy wrote:
Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:36 pm
Mpol02 wrote:
Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:20 am
If the ADL university redevelopment happens, north terrace will be quite the place for some great design.
That seems unlikely, last year Adelaide Uni comprehensively shelved any infrastructure development for the next 5-10 years, aside from urgent maintenance.
Was it shelved because of COVID or for other reasons?

Patrick_27
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2576
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#757 Post by Patrick_27 » Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:11 pm

Spotto wrote:
Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:04 pm
Listy wrote:
Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:36 pm
Mpol02 wrote:
Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:20 am
If the ADL university redevelopment happens, north terrace will be quite the place for some great design.
That seems unlikely, last year Adelaide Uni comprehensively shelved any infrastructure development for the next 5-10 years, aside from urgent maintenance.
Was it shelved because of COVID or for other reasons?
Because the UoA was already broke, COVID only made it worse.

ml69
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1008
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Adelaide SA

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#758 Post by ml69 » Thu Feb 04, 2021 9:58 pm

Bob wrote:
Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:35 am
The proposed building itself is unique but it needs to be positioned back from North Terrace.

Additionally, the theme of a consistent plane tree lined boulevard on the northern side of North Terrace will be broken due to this building being too close and their proposal to put native shrubs and pools up to the footpath.

This section of the footpath will be very hot in summer and disconnecting the Botantic Garden from the usual street trees that line North Terrace on that side if their planned native landscape theme goes ahead.

The eastern frontage of the Botantic Garden (Hackney Road), tried this native landscaping format, it looks shocking, is impractical, is very hot in summer. and does not entice visitors with a good entry feel.

We are in danger of making a blunder here with both the buildings position on the plot and the landscaping out the front, the proposed landscaping and associated water features could easily be moved to the rear of the building, or in the courtyard of the building, or stay at the front if the building is moved back.
Fair point about continuing the tree planting theme to join with the Botanic Garden.

Mpol02
Legendary Member!
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 4:06 am

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#759 Post by Mpol02 » Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:25 am

Patrick_27 wrote:
Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:11 pm
Spotto wrote:
Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:04 pm
Listy wrote:
Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:36 pm


That seems unlikely, last year Adelaide Uni comprehensively shelved any infrastructure development for the next 5-10 years, aside from urgent maintenance.
Was it shelved because of COVID or for other reasons?
Because the UoA was already broke, COVID only made it worse.
This sucks because that vision was wonderful.

User avatar
AndyWelsh
Legendary Member!
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:44 pm

[SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#760 Post by AndyWelsh » Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:03 am

The 16-level, 35,000 square metre Entrepreneur and Innovation Centre (EIC) had development approval on 10 Feb by the State Commission Assessment Panel.

The Australian Government has committed up to $20 million in capital towards the establishment of the Innovation Hub on the first and ground floors of the EIC through the Adelaide City Deal.

Early site work has started, and the building complete by late 2023.

Image

Image

Image

Image


Note the new Lot Fourteen logo features on the top floor of the building. This logo is only a few weeks old, so perhaps quite a new render:
Image

Previously this view had been shown as a white box:

Image

It was also once this building, when a hotel (?) or something was planned here:
Image




More here:

https://lotfourteen.com.au/news/go-ahea ... ion-centre


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

cmet
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 3:03 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#761 Post by cmet » Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:21 am

10/10 when you consider the likes of Amazon and Accenture are tenants

User avatar
gnrc_louis
Legendary Member!
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#762 Post by gnrc_louis » Sun Feb 14, 2021 11:00 am

Who is actually paying the costs of building it?

User avatar
AndyWelsh
Legendary Member!
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:44 pm

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#763 Post by AndyWelsh » Sun Feb 14, 2021 11:20 am

gnrc_louis wrote:Who is actually paying the costs of building it?
It sounds like this is all part of the Adelaide City Deal with all levels of Government involved in funding and running different elements. More here https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/citie ... y-deal.pdf

Image


Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
gnrc_louis
Legendary Member!
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#764 Post by gnrc_louis » Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:25 pm

AndyWelsh wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 11:20 am
gnrc_louis wrote:Who is actually paying the costs of building it?
It sounds like this is all part of the Adelaide City Deal with all levels of Government involved in funding and running different elements. More here https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/citie ... y-deal.pdf

Image


Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, Andy.

Like the Oval hotel, I would rather the Government leave things like building offices to the private sector and keep hold of assets like public transport, roads etc.

how good is he
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1233
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:26 am

[SWP] Re: Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

#765 Post by how good is he » Sun Feb 14, 2021 9:50 pm

Ok generally thats fair but this is Govt/Crown land. I know Govt could give land leases (ie 99 years) but I expect financing is far harder and private companies more reluctant.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests