As I understand most of the student accommodation can't be used for normal residential, they are too small and get approval by using the specialist "student accommodation" categorySBD wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:10 pmSo is a "student hostel" with common bathroom and kitchen roughly equivalent to the city apartment version of a four-bedroom house in the suburbs? If the bottom falls out of the student market, can these large student buildings be sold/leased as homes for families instead?
[COM] The Switch - 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
- Plasmatron
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:16 pm
- Location: St Georges, Adelaide, SA
- Contact:
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
From earlier today, while they were putting up a panel/wall piece. (27/4/2021)
Last edited by Plasmatron on Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
https://www.youtube.com/UltraVibeProductions
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
After asking the question, I went looking harder for an answer for myself.normh wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 4:15 pmAs I understand most of the student accommodation can't be used for normal residential, they are too small and get approval by using the specialist "student accommodation" categorySBD wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:10 pmSo is a "student hostel" with common bathroom and kitchen roughly equivalent to the city apartment version of a four-bedroom house in the suburbs? If the bottom falls out of the student market, can these large student buildings be sold/leased as homes for families instead?
Page 33 of the submission shows all the intended floorplans and also has one called "future adaptability" that suggests the internals can be redone to provide two apartments per level.each of 100 square metres and three bedrooms. Presumably the walls to the lift core are permanent but all the walls inside each cluster/pod are removable. There would be a lot of flexibility for internal design of an apartment as there would be so much redundant plumbing.
It's not clear they have even done one actual apartment layout to demonstrate how it would work. How does 100 square metres compare to other highrise apartments?
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
100sqm for a city apartment is absolutely hugeSBD wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:33 pmAfter asking the question, I went looking harder for an answer for myself.normh wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 4:15 pmAs I understand most of the student accommodation can't be used for normal residential, they are too small and get approval by using the specialist "student accommodation" categorySBD wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:10 pm
So is a "student hostel" with common bathroom and kitchen roughly equivalent to the city apartment version of a four-bedroom house in the suburbs? If the bottom falls out of the student market, can these large student buildings be sold/leased as homes for families instead?
Page 33 of the submission shows all the intended floorplans and also has one called "future adaptability" that suggests the internals can be redone to provide two apartments per level.each of 100 square metres and three bedrooms. Presumably the walls to the lift core are permanent but all the walls inside each cluster/pod are removable. There would be a lot of flexibility for internal design of an apartment as there would be so much redundant plumbing.
It's not clear they have even done one actual apartment layout to demonstrate how it would work. How does 100 square metres compare to other highrise apartments?
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
If I was the developer, I'd consider making the top of the building configured that way as it is built. Five floors of penthouse apartments 100m above North Terrace would still be premium apartments even if the downstairs neighbours are students.Algernon wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:47 pm100sqm for a city apartment is absolutely hugeSBD wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:33 pmAfter asking the question, I went looking harder for an answer for myself.
Page 33 of the submission shows all the intended floorplans and also has one called "future adaptability" that suggests the internals can be redone to provide two apartments per level.each of 100 square metres and three bedrooms. Presumably the walls to the lift core are permanent but all the walls inside each cluster/pod are removable. There would be a lot of flexibility for internal design of an apartment as there would be so much redundant plumbing.
It's not clear they have even done one actual apartment layout to demonstrate how it would work. How does 100 square metres compare to other highrise apartments?
- Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2139
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
Huge maybe, but the complete lack of even a small outdoor space would presumably be a turn off for many buyers, as would the relative lack of natural light compared to most new CBD apartments.
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
Progress pics
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
I hereby declare this project the ugliest building in Adelaide.
Atira on Waymouth had a good run for 4 or so years.
What an absolute shocker this is. The state planning commission should hang their heads in shame.
Atira on Waymouth had a good run for 4 or so years.
What an absolute shocker this is. The state planning commission should hang their heads in shame.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
- Plasmatron
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:16 pm
- Location: St Georges, Adelaide, SA
- Contact:
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
Three photos I took on Wednesday last week. (28/4/2021)
https://www.youtube.com/UltraVibeProductions
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
I can’t get past how shit those tiny windows fronting North Terrace look. It looks like a public toilet.
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
My understanding from the original approval was that the breakout areas at levels 12, 23 and 32 (roof) were to be fully glazed. This was key to breaking up vertical massing and was pointedly mentioned by the government architect. Did SCAP approve a variance or is the developer sneaking into the build something at odds with their approval?
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2583
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
Given the building's height and location, I think the developers should be facing some repercussions from SCAP over the quality of this build. It's fucking appalling, completely unredeemable. The pictures on this thread don't even fully capture how bad it looks in the flesh.
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
Im not currently in ADL so reading this breaks my heart. What a(nother) blight upon out skyline. I’m fearful out CBD will only end up with more of this quality, unless something is done to prevent it.Patrick_27 wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 9:36 pmGiven the building's height and location, I think the developers should be facing some repercussions from SCAP over the quality of this build. It's fucking appalling, completely unredeemable. The pictures on this thread don't even fully capture how bad it looks in the flesh.
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
This building looks hideous and cheap. I’m sorry guys but I’m not a fan at all…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[COM] Re: 203 North Terrace | 119m | 35 levels | Student Accom
I always reserve judgement of a building’s look until it is completely finished, and I’ll be interested to compare the end result with this 35 storey building currently going up in Perth, to see who wins “bunker of the year”!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 14 guests