Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
rev
- SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
- Posts: 6424
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm
#4711
Post
by rev » Thu Feb 09, 2023 10:19 pm
rubberman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 5:53 pm
A-Town wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 3:17 pm
I think the majority of voters wouldn't be against tram extensions to areas like North Adelaide and the Airport.
Tram extensions proposals weren't the reason why Labor lost the 2018 election.
Agreed. But I think that Koutsantonis's point is that they didn't help
win.
The tram extensions are expensive. From a political perspective spending large amounts of money only makes sense if it looks like
winning an election.
If it wasn't a winner in 2018, and wasn't even discussed in 2022, is it going to be a winner in 2026?
I don't think it's about it being or not being a winner, it wasn't a major policy because there were other priorities they focused on that did win them the election.
Like, who cares about tram extensions when people are dying in the back of ambulances or waiting for an ambulance, while the Lib gov. wants to build a new stadium?
2022 was ramping/health care taking priority over a new stadium.
2026 I think we will see Labor put more focus on public transport infrastructure. There's an indaily article that specifies the diesel trains end of life is around 2030/32. So with the question of what to do with the Outer Harbour line, I think this question will be answered in the next state election cycle.
Then again the way our state politics runs, it could drag out to the 2030 election and a blame game of who let the diesel trains reach the end of life without a solution.
-
claybro
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 9:16 pm
#4712
Post
by claybro » Fri Feb 10, 2023 3:42 pm
[
rev wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 10:19 pm
Then again the way our state politics runs, it could drag out to the 2030 election and a blame game of who let the diesel trains reach the end of life without a solution.
Agreed, and then the most likely outcome then will be to just close Grange spur.and Belair..and bung some wires along OH line with no further upgrades to stations et, and throw some more buses at Belair. No proper planning. Get ready for all the trackless bus-tram or in true Adelaide style-Obahn proposals to be dusted off to muddy the waters and make it look like they are doing something.
-
rubberman
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
#4713
Post
by rubberman » Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:46 pm
rev wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 10:19 pm
rubberman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 5:53 pm
A-Town wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 3:17 pm
I think the majority of voters wouldn't be against tram extensions to areas like North Adelaide and the Airport.
Tram extensions proposals weren't the reason why Labor lost the 2018 election.
Agreed. But I think that Koutsantonis's point is that they didn't help
win.
The tram extensions are expensive. From a political perspective spending large amounts of money only makes sense if it looks like
winning an election.
If it wasn't a winner in 2018, and wasn't even discussed in 2022, is it going to be a winner in 2026?
I don't think it's about it being or not being a winner, it wasn't a major policy because there were other priorities they focused on that did win them the election.
Like, who cares about tram extensions when people are dying in the back of ambulances or waiting for an ambulance, while the Lib gov. wants to build a new stadium?
2022 was ramping/health care taking priority over a new stadium.
Aren't you saying the same thing? Ambulances, and doing something about ramping was the winner. Trams were not. They weren't even mentioned.
Now, personally, I think they could make a difference if the polls are close in 2026. But according to the article, Konstantonis certainly doesn't, and I think he has more say than I. Of course, being a politician, he will backflip if required.
-
ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2764
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
-
Contact:
#4714
Post
by ChillyPhilly » Sun Feb 12, 2023 7:53 am
Regardless of where investment in light rail sits politically in SA, we need to develop or permanently obtain the expertise behind it to help drive down cost. It shouldn't be as expensive as it is.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
-
rev
- SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
- Posts: 6424
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm
#4715
Post
by rev » Sun Feb 12, 2023 3:39 pm
rubberman wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:46 pm
rev wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 10:19 pm
rubberman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 5:53 pm
Agreed. But I think that Koutsantonis's point is that they didn't help
win.
The tram extensions are expensive. From a political perspective spending large amounts of money only makes sense if it looks like
winning an election.
If it wasn't a winner in 2018, and wasn't even discussed in 2022, is it going to be a winner in 2026?
I don't think it's about it being or not being a winner, it wasn't a major policy because there were other priorities they focused on that did win them the election.
Like, who cares about tram extensions when people are dying in the back of ambulances or waiting for an ambulance, while the Lib gov. wants to build a new stadium?
2022 was ramping/health care taking priority over a new stadium.
Aren't you saying the same thing? Ambulances, and doing something about ramping was the winner. Trams were not. They weren't even mentioned.
Now, personally, I think they could make a difference if the polls are close in 2026. But according to the article, Konstantonis certainly doesn't, and I think he has more say than I. Of course, being a politician, he will backflip if required.
Basically yes, but I don't think they left out a tram policy in 2022 because they didn't think it would be a winner, but because they realized the big issue for people was the hospital/health care/ramping crisis and that's what they shot their shot with and it worked. They played it politically smart to get back into power.
The article makes it sound like trams are off the table now. But I don't think that's the case. They'd be crazy to rule them out.
Personally I think they're playing politics as usual. They have every intention of expanding the tram network, but we wont hear about it for a few years.
It'll be like an ace up their sleeve. The diesel trains on the Outer Harbor line have about ten years of service life left in them apparently. That makes the 2026 election year interesting because we could see a plan/policy come out then, with work starting with the Outer Harbour line as part of the plan should Labor win.
-
PeFe
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:47 am
#4716
Post
by PeFe » Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:34 pm
First look at designs for Cross and Marion Road overpasses.
-
SRW
- Donating Member
- Posts: 3658
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Glenelg
#4717
Post
by SRW » Thu Apr 06, 2023 6:27 am
Latest update info sheet from department:
https://dit.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf ... Update.pdf
Key features include:
• new Tram Stop 10 located between Marion Road and CrossRoad
• new open community space and free-flow connections under the tram line
• lifts and stairs on the western and eastern sides of Marion Road
• elevated Mike Turtur Bikeway and shared use path alongside tram tracks
As part of the project, the capacity of turning lanes will be increased at the intersections of:
• Marion Road and Anzac Highway
• Marion Road and Cross Road
These upgrades will further ease congestion and improve travel times and safety.
Concept plans are currently being developed for the intersection upgrades and will be released shortly.
Construction is expected to commence mid-2024 and complete late 2025. To allow faster construction (and in a personal blow to me), the tram line will be closed for 6-9 months and replaced by substitute buses. I don't know what that means for City section without access to Glengowrie depot.
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
-
Contact:
#4718
Post
by Nathan » Thu Apr 06, 2023 9:00 am
Didn’t they have temporary tracks to the side when building the South Rd overpass? Why not do the same again?
-
Saltwater
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 3:07 pm
- Location: Inner West
#4719
Post
by Saltwater » Thu Apr 06, 2023 9:48 am
SRW wrote: ↑Thu Apr 06, 2023 6:27 am
Construction is expected to commence mid-2024 and complete late 2025. To allow faster construction (and in a personal blow to me), the tram line will be closed for 6-9 months and replaced by substitute buses. I don't know what that means for City section without access to Glengowrie depot.
They could always build a temporary tram shed in the parklands, I'm sure ACC would be fully supportive where it benefits city residents and workers in keeping the trams running
-
AG
- VIP Member
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
- Location: Adelaide SA
#4720
Post
by AG » Thu Apr 06, 2023 9:50 am
Sounds to me that the entire tram network will be closed during the works as the South Road overpass is also going to be partially rebuilt to accommodate the North South Motorway.
-
Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
#4721
Post
by Llessur2002 » Thu Apr 06, 2023 10:03 am
Wasn't it mentioned earlier in the thread that this project includes a new depot at Hindmarsh or Thebarton? Perhaps that will be completed before the line is severed.
-
ozisnowman
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm
#4722
Post
by ozisnowman » Thu Apr 06, 2023 10:04 am
claybro wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 3:42 pm
[
rev wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 10:19 pm
Then again the way our state politics runs, it could drag out to the 2030 election and a blame game of who let the diesel trains reach the end of life without a solution.
Agreed, and then the most likely outcome then will be to just close Grange spur.and Belair..and bung some wires along OH line with no further upgrades to stations et, and throw some more buses at Belair. No proper planning. Get ready for all the trackless bus-tram or in true Adelaide style-Obahn proposals to be dusted off to muddy the waters and make it look like they are doing something.
Belair should be upgraded and extended to at least Mt Barker - there are diesel/electric trains that could lower the electricity arm to pass under tunnels. What is needed is to move the freight lines up north so they can be double stacked. Putting on more buses to Belair is a joke, that will just turn patrons away from public transport resulting in more cars on the road.
Which line do you use claybro? Gawler or Seaford? how would you like that closed and replaced with buses.
-
Eurostar
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 954
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:44 pm
#4723
Post
by Eurostar » Thu Apr 06, 2023 11:21 am
Recently I watched a video on Youtube of a redhen running between Bridgewater and Adelaide, it took about 50 minutes from Bridgewater to Adelaide and that ran semi express (all stops to Belair, then express to Blackwood then express to Adelaide). Mind you it did have to wait in a passing loop before Belair as it had to wait for freight train to pass. A Vlocity train might be a little faster and be close journey times to the 864 from Bridgewater to Adelaide but vary a fair amount between Mount Barker and Adelaide (compared with 840x).
-
Vasco
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2018 9:02 pm
#4724
Post
by Vasco » Thu Apr 06, 2023 12:58 pm
Not 100% sure but what it sounded like on the radio this morning was;
Trams to continue running in the city at a minimum, but some kind of shuttle bus service down the line.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
PD2/20
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 2:32 pm
#4725
Post
by PD2/20 » Thu Apr 06, 2023 1:10 pm
AG wrote: ↑Thu Apr 06, 2023 9:50 am
Sounds to me that the entire tram network will be closed during the works as the South Road overpass is also going to be partially rebuilt to accommodate the North South Motorway.
A media release on the project website speaks of a section of the line being closed. Jon Whelan, DIT CEO, was interviewed on ABC Radio Adelaide Breakfast and said the intention was to retain a fleet of trams to run services in the CBD. They were investigating how best to maintain this fleet.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests