The platforms in that photo also have a taller-than-ARS ceiling height that can accommodate double-decker trains.Llessur2002 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 19, 2023 3:22 pmNo, but it would cost a huge amount of money to either raise the ceiling height or lower ground/track level which is what was proposed above. Absolutely agree that an aesthetic uplift is needed but I don't think massive civil works are. The height is far from the main problem.Spotto wrote: ↑Mon Jun 19, 2023 3:05 pmPublic spaces are allowed to be both functional AND aesthetic. I doubt it would cost tens of millions of dollars to find a way to make the platforms brighter and more welcoming.Llessur2002 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 19, 2023 9:39 amThe platform areas are mainly functional space so I don't feel need to have tens of millions spent on them just for aesthetics.
There are plenty of aesthetically pleasing stations with low-ceilings around the world and I've actually always felt the tunnel-like qualities make it feel more like a busy European-style metro hub than the relatively sleepy terminus it actually is. I also think the stark difference in spaces between the main concourse and platforms opens up possibilities for an uber-modern design as there are fewer reasons to keep in line with the heritage style in the remainder of the building.
Something along the lines of this should be perfectly achievable with a relatively minor facelift.
The false ceiling directly over the platforms at ARS is the problem. The actual ceiling height of the platform area is higher (take a peek above the train tracks where the wires are.
Yes, the extractor system is behind that false ceiling, but there might still be some way to raise it without compromising the extractor.