News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2723
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6076 Post by SBD » Wed May 08, 2024 11:51 pm

abc wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 11:29 pm
Patrick_27 wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 7:22 pm
abc wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 1:17 pm


sounds inefficient to me
It works for East coast. Regional rail services are the backbone of this.
there's 8 million people living on the east coast
Are the east coast regional railways only used for passengers? The SAR network was built for freight, with passengers also using it. Most passenger services stopped well before the last freight services on each line, but ultimately they were all replaced by faster more cost-efficient road services. Road services are faster and more efficient because the governments provide the roads but expect full cost recovery from railways. They didn't get enough revenue to provide a dividend and also maintain and upgrade the railways, so they were allowed to decay into disrepair, making it less and less likely that anyone would want to use them.

kaska
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 1:55 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6077 Post by kaska » Thu May 09, 2024 10:12 am

abc wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 1:17 pm
kaska wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 1:09 pm
abc wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2024 10:47 pm


and how would you encourage people to live in those places?
Embracing full remote work. Starting with a lot of government jobs, and giving incentives to companies that do the same
sounds inefficient to me
I work fully remote in a company that is full remote. We all are very productive. Why do you say it is inefficient? It's just a change of mindset that is needed

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1221
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6078 Post by abc » Thu May 09, 2024 5:49 pm

kaska wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 10:12 am
abc wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 1:17 pm
kaska wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 1:09 pm


Embracing full remote work. Starting with a lot of government jobs, and giving incentives to companies that do the same
sounds inefficient to me
I work fully remote in a company that is full remote. We all are very productive. Why do you say it is inefficient? It's just a change of mindset that is needed
Maybe you're remote for a reason...
tired of low IQ hacks

rubberman
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2029
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6079 Post by rubberman » Thu May 09, 2024 9:47 pm

kaska wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 10:12 am
abc wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 1:17 pm
kaska wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 1:09 pm


Embracing full remote work. Starting with a lot of government jobs, and giving incentives to companies that do the same
sounds inefficient to me
I work fully remote in a company that is full remote. We all are very productive. Why do you say it is inefficient? It's just a change of mindset that is needed
It's just his opinion. I'll be extremely surprised if you get an explanation.

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1221
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6080 Post by abc » Fri May 10, 2024 2:04 am

rubberman wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 9:47 pm
kaska wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 10:12 am
abc wrote:
Wed May 08, 2024 1:17 pm


sounds inefficient to me
I work fully remote in a company that is full remote. We all are very productive. Why do you say it is inefficient? It's just a change of mindset that is needed
It's just his opinion. I'll be extremely surprised if you get an explanation.
cities exist for a reason
central business districts exist for a reason

once again, you seem to carry a hostile attitude into every discussion
tired of low IQ hacks

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6081 Post by rhino » Fri May 10, 2024 8:04 am

abc wrote:
Fri May 10, 2024 2:04 am

cities exist for a reason
central business districts exist for a reason
Aqueducts exist for a reason too. Doesn't mean they are still required. Things evolve and change.
cheers,
Rhino

kaska
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 1:55 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6082 Post by kaska » Fri May 10, 2024 10:22 am

abc wrote:
Fri May 10, 2024 2:04 am
rubberman wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 9:47 pm
kaska wrote:
Thu May 09, 2024 10:12 am


I work fully remote in a company that is full remote. We all are very productive. Why do you say it is inefficient? It's just a change of mindset that is needed
It's just his opinion. I'll be extremely surprised if you get an explanation.
cities exist for a reason
central business districts exist for a reason

once again, you seem to carry a hostile attitude into every discussion
I believe expanding the city to the outskirts won't kill the central business district, it will create other economic areas that will make living in Adelaide more pleasurable. Adelaide needs to prepare for strong population growth, it will happen. Melbourne had the same population 50 years ago that Adelaide has now.

All the changes that are happening in the city, all the new development, will turn Adelaide into a vibrant city that will make it a very interesting place to live. I personally think that the population projections for Adelaide are wrong, the growth will be significantly more than expected.

Building satellite cities around Adelaide will only enrich the whole Adelaide experience, not make it worse. And contributing to the growth of those satellite cities will be the opportunity to have flexible work arrangements.

This is just my humble opinion. Thanks for the respectful conversation

User avatar
Spotto
Legendary Member!
Posts: 753
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 9:05 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6083 Post by Spotto » Sat May 11, 2024 12:47 am

abc wrote:
Fri May 10, 2024 2:04 am
cities exist for a reason
central business districts exist for a reason
The transformation of Parramatta into Sydney’s second CBD isn’t killing the old CBD, it’s creating a new economic and business hub.

Not all business necessarily has to be centred on the traditional CBD.

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1221
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6084 Post by abc » Sat May 11, 2024 12:57 am

Spotto wrote:
Sat May 11, 2024 12:47 am
abc wrote:
Fri May 10, 2024 2:04 am
cities exist for a reason
central business districts exist for a reason
The transformation of Parramatta into Sydney’s second CBD isn’t killing the old CBD, it’s creating a new economic and business hub.

Not all business necessarily has to be centred on the traditional CBD.
Parramatta is in the geographical population centre of greater Sydney... again a metro area of over 5 million people.

This only strengthens my point.
tired of low IQ hacks

cmet
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 3:03 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6085 Post by cmet » Wed May 15, 2024 11:31 pm

Talk about a staggering statistic.

Rail commitments for the rest of the decade.

Image

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1221
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6086 Post by abc » Thu May 16, 2024 12:55 am

cmet wrote:
Wed May 15, 2024 11:31 pm
Talk about a staggering statistic.

Rail commitments for the rest of the decade.

Image
Seems commensurate to wealth, forecast growth and population.

Remember much of our available funds are tied up in metropolitan Adelaide's very first motorway.
tired of low IQ hacks

Saltwater
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 3:07 pm
Location: Inner West

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6087 Post by Saltwater » Thu May 16, 2024 8:31 am

abc wrote:
Thu May 16, 2024 12:55 am

Remember much of our available funds are tied up in metropolitan Adelaide's very first motorway.
Unfortunately yes, and will be for the next decade or so. Adelaide has a multi-decade infrastructure backlog it needs to catch up on first, and the NSM is top of the list.

Also it's not just the funds tied up in NSM construction. There's a finite number of skilled resources available to build projects of this scale, and with experience needed to operate TBM's etc. I do hope that when the NSM is done we can seriously consider some kind of underground rail in the CBD.

victorious80
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:33 am

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6088 Post by victorious80 » Thu May 16, 2024 8:43 am

That doesnt seem right. The Tram Grade Sep program alone is a $400m 50:50 state/feds contribution. not that i dont want even more rail investment, but the numbers dont seem to align.

User avatar
rogue
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 660
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:45 am
Location: Over here

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6089 Post by rogue » Thu May 16, 2024 9:44 am

victorious80 wrote:
Thu May 16, 2024 8:43 am
That doesnt seem right. The Tram Grade Sep program alone is a $400m 50:50 state/feds contribution. not that i dont want even more rail investment, but the numbers dont seem to align.
The Glenelg Tram Grade Separations project is an enabling project for T2D and therefore funded as part of T2D.

A-Town
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 422
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:14 am

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

#6090 Post by A-Town » Thu May 16, 2024 10:06 am

victorious80 wrote:
Thu May 16, 2024 8:43 am
That doesnt seem right. The Tram Grade Sep program alone is a $400m 50:50 state/feds contribution. not that i dont want even more rail investment, but the numbers dont seem to align.
Grade separation programs aren't really an investment in public transport, though. They benefit road users more so than tram patrons.

Do Victoria's numbers in the graph above include budget allocated towards their grade separation project?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests