News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#766 Post by ChillyPhilly » Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:48 pm

Adelaide Comets' application for a 1.1m high fence has been voted down 5-4 by Council. Discussion to continue.

I can see both sides of the debate, but the decision sadly keeps National Premier League games away from the CBD.

Article: https://www.indaily.com.au/news/adelaid ... ejects-bid
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

victorious80
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:33 am

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#767 Post by victorious80 » Fri Feb 16, 2024 10:18 am

Is that the soccer pitch that's fairly close to the rail line, down near Sir Donald Bradman? If so, it's not really the part of the parklands where members of the public are likely to venture. It's locked between rail corridor, a main road and other ovals. There is no residential or commercial nearby to encourage any sort of pedestrian movement. In fact, it is prob one of the least amenable and accessible sections of the parklands.

I can understand the need to keep areas of parklands open and inviting where they abut commercial, residential or tourism precincts, but it seems an odd decision in that location. Maybe they didn't want to set a precedent, but surely there is some room for context in these decisions.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3827
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#768 Post by Nathan » Fri Feb 16, 2024 11:34 am

victorious80 wrote:
Fri Feb 16, 2024 10:18 am
Is that the soccer pitch that's fairly close to the rail line, down near Sir Donald Bradman? If so, it's not really the part of the parklands where members of the public are likely to venture. It's locked between rail corridor, a main road and other ovals. There is no residential or commercial nearby to encourage any sort of pedestrian movement. In fact, it is prob one of the least amenable and accessible sections of the parklands.

I can understand the need to keep areas of parklands open and inviting where they abut commercial, residential or tourism precincts, but it seems an odd decision in that location. Maybe they didn't want to set a precedent, but surely there is some room for context in these decisions.
It would be this area here:
Screenshot 2024-02-16 at 11.32.39 am.png

abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1249
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#769 Post by abc » Sun Feb 18, 2024 8:33 pm

ChillyPhilly wrote:
Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:48 pm
Adelaide Comets' application for a 1.1m high fence has been voted down 5-4 by Council. Discussion to continue.

I can see both sides of the debate, but the decision sadly keeps National Premier League games away from the CBD.

Article: https://www.indaily.com.au/news/adelaid ... ejects-bid
have they been kicked out of the athletics 'stadium'?
tired of low IQ hacks

ml69
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#770 Post by ml69 » Sat Apr 13, 2024 3:13 pm

With SA’s bicentenary a mere 11 years away, wouldn’t it be a great legacy for future generations if we could implement a bold vision to substantially spruce up the parklands to create a truly great urban park?

I’ve looked at posts on this discussion going back to 2007 (17 years ago), and the laments over dry barren dustbowls is just as relevant today. Nothing has changed despite countless plans and visions.

We should use the 2036 bicentenary as a one-off generational capital investment into the parklands. This may mean something like (I’m guessing) $300-600 million expenditure, but spread over the next 11 years, it’s actually a relatively modest investment per year.

The below Riverbank Master Plan from 2013 with a redeveloped Bonython Park with wetlands is a great place to start. Nothing has ever happened with this.
https://www.slideshare.net/lmannix1/med ... ion-240613

In addition, let’s implement other sensible proposals to make the parklands into a more attractive destination, beautify them, increase amenity, make them easier to access and make them safer. Ideas include:

- BEAUTIFY/SAFETY: Substantial amount of avenue planting of trees along West, South and East Tce, along with all roads cutting through the parklands. Also avenue plantings along major walkways and bikeways through the parklands, with much improved lighting.
- DESTINATION: Bonython Park rejuvenation with wetlands and water play areas (rename as Bicentennial Park maybe)
- DESTINATION: Build new world-class adventure playgrounds with real “wow” factor to service the Adelaide CBD and surrounding suburbs. Locations could be: Victoria Park (east), adjacent to new Adelaide Aquatic Centre (north), corner South Tce and King William Rd (south) and extension to existing playground at Bonython Park (west).
- DESTINATION/BEAUTIFY: Create an integrated landscaped riverbank along the Torrens between the weir and King William St bridge. With high quality walking/bike paths, seating, new landscaping and boardwalks. Make this well-lit at night.
The transition between the Riverbank walkway (in front of the Convention Centre) and the grassy lawns leading to the River Torrens is absolutely terrible. This should be re-made into a beautifully landscaped terrace which steps down to the lawns.
- DESTINATION: Extend the Himeji Japanese garden concept to include a Chinese garden and desert garden in the south parklands, associated with our sister cities (Qingdao, China and Austin, USA.
- AMENITY: Rebuild those sports club changerooms etc.
- BEAUTIFY: The ugly dry paddocks in the northern parklands and near Anzac Hwy should reinstated as natural bushland habitat with groundcovers and new native trees planted.

These proposals should be relatively uncontroversial. There are undoubtedly loads of other great ideas out there as well.

Further, to ensure parklands maintenance is adequately funded going forwards, the state government should take control over the ACC. The parklands are for all South Australians, they are not a giant council park.

User avatar
Nathan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3827
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
Location: Bowden
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#771 Post by Nathan » Sat Apr 13, 2024 5:08 pm

Agreed, and it's a massive shame that absolutely nothing from that masterplan has been implemented.

I'd add to that list, progress on connecting the different parks by grade separating pedestrian links from the roads that cut across, with the eventual goal of being able to circle the entire city without having to cross a road.

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2302
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#772 Post by Nort » Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:30 am

I could not agree more with the general gist of the last two posts.

Have been spending a fair bit of time in the Botanic gardens in the last few months, and it's always so lively and well-used. Obviously we could never afford to landscape all the parklands to that standard, but it shows how much potential the parklands have not just as a cool green belt for the city, but valuable public infrastructure.

Definitely agree with getting some more adventure playgrounds and the like into the parklands.

ml69
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#773 Post by ml69 » Tue Apr 16, 2024 10:47 pm

I have written to Premier Malinauskas about using the 2036 bicentenary as the occasion to get a massive funding boost for the parklands. Let’s see what happens!

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#774 Post by ChillyPhilly » Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:55 am

Agree completely with all suggestions.

Love the idea of new/expanded/more gardens, coordinated tree plantings and improvements to amenity.

I do have a basic plan for a new/enhanced cycling route with grade separations across all roads. This would be incredible.

2036 is a great opportunity to realise an easy, quickly-achieved but ambitious vision as a big city rather than the lackadaisical Big Country Town Mentality.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

ml69
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#775 Post by ml69 » Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:13 pm

ml69 wrote:
Tue Apr 16, 2024 10:47 pm
I have written to Premier Malinauskas about using the 2036 bicentenary as the occasion to get a massive funding boost for the parklands. Let’s see what happens!
Got this reply from the Premier’s office today:

“Thank you for your email of 16 April 2024 to the Premier of South Australia, the Hon Peter Malinauskas, MP.

The Premier appreciates your suggestions about Adelaide's Parklands.

We have taken the liberty of forwarding your correspondence to the Minister for Local Government, as some of the proposals are within the remit of the Adelaide City Council.

Some of your other suggestions are more appropriate to be considered by the Adelaide Park Lands Authority, as set out in the Adelaide Park Lands Act 2005, which is committed to the Minister for Planning, and so we have provided this correspondence to the Minister for Planning also.

Once again, thank you for writing to the Premier.”

What does this mean? Will anything happen?

User avatar
gnrc_louis
Legendary Member!
Posts: 984
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 2:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#776 Post by gnrc_louis » Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:17 pm

ml69 wrote:
Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:13 pm
ml69 wrote:
Tue Apr 16, 2024 10:47 pm
I have written to Premier Malinauskas about using the 2036 bicentenary as the occasion to get a massive funding boost for the parklands. Let’s see what happens!
Got this reply from the Premier’s office today:

“Thank you for your email of 16 April 2024 to the Premier of South Australia, the Hon Peter Malinauskas, MP.

The Premier appreciates your suggestions about Adelaide's Parklands.

We have taken the liberty of forwarding your correspondence to the Minister for Local Government, as some of the proposals are within the remit of the Adelaide City Council.

Some of your other suggestions are more appropriate to be considered by the Adelaide Park Lands Authority, as set out in the Adelaide Park Lands Act 2005, which is committed to the Minister for Planning, and so we have provided this correspondence to the Minister for Planning also.

Once again, thank you for writing to the Premier.”

What does this mean? Will anything happen?
Probably not, unfortunately. Letters to MPs in Government are responded to by public servants out of courtesy and that's usually the end of it

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#777 Post by ChillyPhilly » Thu Apr 25, 2024 10:42 pm

ml69 wrote:
Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:13 pm
ml69 wrote:
Tue Apr 16, 2024 10:47 pm
I have written to Premier Malinauskas about using the 2036 bicentenary as the occasion to get a massive funding boost for the parklands. Let’s see what happens!
Got this reply from the Premier’s office today:

“Thank you for your email of 16 April 2024 to the Premier of South Australia, the Hon Peter Malinauskas, MP.

The Premier appreciates your suggestions about Adelaide's Parklands.

We have taken the liberty of forwarding your correspondence to the Minister for Local Government, as some of the proposals are within the remit of the Adelaide City Council.

Some of your other suggestions are more appropriate to be considered by the Adelaide Park Lands Authority, as set out in the Adelaide Park Lands Act 2005, which is committed to the Minister for Planning, and so we have provided this correspondence to the Minister for Planning also.

Once again, thank you for writing to the Premier.”

What does this mean? Will anything happen?
SA MPs have usually been great at responding to letters. Years ago I wrote two to Patrick Conlon and he replied personally. I wrote to Carmel Zollo and a staffer replied. I have also written to Jay Weatherill and his office followed up my request to meet via a phone call (she was lovely). The meeting occurred, too!
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#778 Post by ChillyPhilly » Tue Jun 25, 2024 11:34 pm

Adelaide Park Lands Management Strategy (APLMS) - Towards 2036

The Kadaltilla / Adelaide Park Lands Authority (Kadaltilla) has undertaken a review of the existing Adelaide Park Lands Management Strategy 2015-2025 (APLMS) with a bold vision for the overall enhancement and protection of the Adelaide Park Lands.

The APLMS is a joint State Government and Council owned document, which is prepared and maintained on their behalf by Kadaltilla.

The draft APLMS sets out a long-term vision for our city’s open space and guides us in ways to protect and manage them through the next decade.
Have your say here:

https://www.cityofadelaide.com.au/commu ... ards-2036/
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

Nort
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2302
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:08 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#779 Post by Nort » Thu Jun 27, 2024 12:04 pm

Most things in there are good, but I'd still like to see a bolder vision to really kick things up a notch. The term "world class" is very overused, often for situations it doesn't apply, but the parklands surrounding the city are unique enough that it really is an opportunity to have something that is a world class series of urban parks.

Relevant to the other discussion on this page, it's interesting to see that this document also explicitly addresses fencing in the parklands and makes it clear that removing fencing and only having new fencing when absolutely required is a specific goal.

I also like that it calls out the need for better pedestrian and cycling connections to the western suburbs, the Donald Bradman bridge over the trainline is a death trap for cyclists and extremely unpleasant for pedestrians.

User avatar
SouthAussie94
Legendary Member!
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
Location: Southern Suburbs

Re: News & Discussion: Squares and Parklands

#780 Post by SouthAussie94 » Fri Jul 05, 2024 7:44 am

Roads blocked under ‘courageous’ Light Square design plan

Vehicle access to Waymouth St from Morphett St would be blocked and other traffic restrictions imposed under an “ambitious” blueprint to redesign Light Square being considered by Adelaide City Council.

The council’s master plan for Light Square/Wauwi would  prioritise pedestrians with safer, well-lit open spaces while increasing tree canopy by at least 25 per cent.

Lord Mayor Jane Lomax-Smith said the master plan, which was presented to the council’s City Planning, Development and Business Affairs Committee meeting on Tuesday, was “courageous” and a “genuine return to park lands”.

Full Article: https://www.indaily.com.au/news/local/2 ... aster-plan
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"

Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests