News & Discussion: Other Transport Projects

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
abc
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1159
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:35 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Other Transport Projects

#706 Post by abc » Wed May 22, 2024 12:01 pm

ml69 wrote:
Tue May 21, 2024 11:41 pm
rev wrote:
Tue May 02, 2023 12:36 pm
rubberman wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:46 am


In 1836, a port was essential for a remote new colony. The river was barely navigable all year round before the barrages were installed.

Having said that, Governor Hindmarsh preferred Victor Harbor. That would have sufficed till it ran out of space and water, by which time rail technology would have been sufficiently developed to make connections to Murray Bridge...and Melbourne quite feasible. That would have left the Adelaide Plains, the most fertile in the State, to serve as the food bowl, rather than being built upon and thus lost to agriculture.

It also would have meant rail access to the East and North would have been much faster and easier, along with access to the River Murray for drinking etc, and transport in the early days.

Quite an interesting "what if".
Wow never knew that.
I've pondered the "what if Adelaide was in X place instead"..Goolwa/Hindmarsh island out towards Finnis, Currency Creek, Milang and Clayton Bay..
Dredged the waterways, a CBD located where Goolwa North is, the City spilling across onto the western point of Hindmarsh Island with high rise apartments...Lake Alexandrina and the beaches of the Coorong on our door step..towns dotted around the shore of the lake.
Very interesting to speculate. I just had a look at a map of the area, and assuming the CBD is where Goolwa North is now (and assuming Adelaide is about the same size as it currently is), we would have shoreline and water frontage exceeding that of Sydney Harbour. Adelaide would be a vastly different city to what it is now.
good luck getting ships through the Murray mouth
tired of low IQ hacks

SBD
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2708
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:49 pm
Location: Blakeview

Re: News & Discussion: Other Transport Projects

#707 Post by SBD » Wed May 22, 2024 2:02 pm

ml69 wrote:
Tue May 21, 2024 11:10 pm
SBD wrote:
Tue May 02, 2023 2:56 pm
rev wrote:
Tue May 02, 2023 12:36 pm


Wow never knew that.
I've pondered the "what if Adelaide was in X place instead"..Goolwa/Hindmarsh island out towards Finnis, Currency Creek, Milang and Clayton Bay..
Dredged the waterways, a CBD located where Goolwa North is, the City spilling across onto the western point of Hindmarsh Island with high rise apartments...Lake Alexandrina and the beaches of the Coorong on our door step..towns dotted around the shore of the lake.
Many other places don't have just one huge city that draws everyone in. Various planning policies at times over the last 200 years have led to that situation here. We could have had large cities separate from Adelaide at Mount Gambier, Renmark/Berri, Murray Bridge/Monarto, Elizabeth, Port Pirie, Whyalla, Port Lincoln. They could all have fast regional rail for both passengers and freight between the cities (including Adelaide). Most of them could be large enough to have a multidiscipline campus of a university, a range of industry to provide a viable diversity of employment etc. Instead, we have concentrated everything on a large sprawling Adelaide and drained much of the urban vibrancy from most of the others.
All well in theory.
But in reality even if Adelaide was located at Victor Harbor or Port Lincoln or wherever, most likely it would have just sprawled and become one dominant city in SA anyway. Look at the other state capitals in Aus, they’ve become the dominant city in their respective states.
Melbourne has sprawled to pick up lots of places that used to be separate towns, just like Adelaide. Victoria also has Geelong, Bendigo, Ballarat, Shepparton, Mildura, Morwell that seem to offer a fuller experience than Whyalla, Port Lincoln, Mount Gambier, Murray Bridge, Port Pirie. Victoria's towns have regional ail for passengers and I think freight too.

User avatar
1NEEDS2POST
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:01 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Other Transport Projects

#708 Post by 1NEEDS2POST » Wed May 29, 2024 9:52 pm

It's good that Adelaide's CBD is not on the coast because it means people can live closer to the CBD. This is because people can live in all directions around the CBD, so it's like a circle. Coastal CBDs force the population to live in a semi-circle, which is a larger radius for the same population.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6380
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Other Transport Projects

#709 Post by rev » Thu Jul 04, 2024 1:25 pm

New $6m upgrade to ease traffic bottlenecks at intersection of Adam and Manton streets, Hindmarsh
An extra lane will be added to ease traffic congestion at a notorious pressure point on the outskirts of the CBD. See the flyover animation of the project.

Shashi Baltutis
Reporter

less than 2 min read
July 4, 2024 - 11:04AM


Don't miss out on the headlines from SA News. Followed categories will be added to My News.

A $6m project has been announced to ease city-bound traffic in an area “notorious” for build-up.

The east-west bottleneck will be widened with a second left turn lane from Manton St into Adam St at Hindmarsh.

Image
An extra turning lane will be added from Manton St into Adam St to provide additional capacity for city-bound traffic. Picture: Supplied

Image
Artist impression of the Manton St and Adam St intersection upgrade at Hindmarsh.

A new animation has been revealed which illustrates the easing of traffic in the area adjacent to the Entertainment Centre.

The project will provide safer an easier access to the sports and entertainment hub including Hindmarsh Stadium.

The right-hand turn from Manton St onto Adam St to allow access to the Hindmarsh precinct will be retained in the project.

Image
An extra turning lane will be added from Manton St into Adam St to provide additional capacity for city-bound traffic. Picture: Supplied

Image
How the upgraded intersection will look from the ground.

Infrastructure and Transport Minister Tom Koutsantonis said the project is “a welcome addition for western suburbs motorists”.

“It will reduce congestion and traffic flow restrictions by providing additional capacity for city bound traffic – alleviating a notorious bottleneck,” Mr Koutsantonis said.

“These network upgrades will ensure the proper functioning of the River Torrens to Darlington motorway and wider road network both during and after construction … of the project.”

Bardavcol, a South Australian company which has worked on projects such as the Flagstaff Rd upgrade, will deliver the upgrade at Hindmarsh.

Works are set to commence within weeks with completion scheduled for early next year.

About 30 jobs will be supported during construction.
https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sou ... 327fcca1fe

RetroGamer87
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Other Transport Projects

#710 Post by RetroGamer87 » Thu Jul 04, 2024 4:03 pm

rubberman wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 9:46 am
Eurostar wrote:
Wed Mar 03, 2021 1:50 am
To think maybe the current Murray Bridge area should have been used for site of Adelaide
In 1836, a port was essential for a remote new colony. The river was barely navigable all year round before the barrages were installed.

Having said that, Governor Hindmarsh preferred Victor Harbor. That would have sufficed till it ran out of space and water, by which time rail technology would have been sufficiently developed to make connections to Murray Bridge...and Melbourne quite feasible. That would have left the Adelaide Plains, the most fertile in the State, to serve as the food bowl, rather than being built upon and thus lost to agriculture.

It also would have meant rail access to the East and North would have been much faster and easier, along with access to the River Murray for drinking etc, and transport in the early days.

Quite an interesting "what if".
So, would it actually have been better than what we have now?

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

Re: News & Discussion: Other Transport Projects

#711 Post by ChillyPhilly » Mon Jul 08, 2024 12:42 pm

rev wrote:
Thu Jul 04, 2024 1:25 pm
New $6m upgrade to ease traffic bottlenecks at intersection of Adam and Manton streets, Hindmarsh
An extra lane will be added to ease traffic congestion at a notorious pressure point on the outskirts of the CBD. See the flyover animation of the project.

Shashi Baltutis
Reporter

less than 2 min read
July 4, 2024 - 11:04AM


Don't miss out on the headlines from SA News. Followed categories will be added to My News.

A $6m project has been announced to ease city-bound traffic in an area “notorious” for build-up.

The east-west bottleneck will be widened with a second left turn lane from Manton St into Adam St at Hindmarsh.

Image
An extra turning lane will be added from Manton St into Adam St to provide additional capacity for city-bound traffic. Picture: Supplied

Image
Artist impression of the Manton St and Adam St intersection upgrade at Hindmarsh.

A new animation has been revealed which illustrates the easing of traffic in the area adjacent to the Entertainment Centre.

The project will provide safer an easier access to the sports and entertainment hub including Hindmarsh Stadium.

The right-hand turn from Manton St onto Adam St to allow access to the Hindmarsh precinct will be retained in the project.

Image
An extra turning lane will be added from Manton St into Adam St to provide additional capacity for city-bound traffic. Picture: Supplied

Image
How the upgraded intersection will look from the ground.

Infrastructure and Transport Minister Tom Koutsantonis said the project is “a welcome addition for western suburbs motorists”.

“It will reduce congestion and traffic flow restrictions by providing additional capacity for city bound traffic – alleviating a notorious bottleneck,” Mr Koutsantonis said.

“These network upgrades will ensure the proper functioning of the River Torrens to Darlington motorway and wider road network both during and after construction … of the project.”

Bardavcol, a South Australian company which has worked on projects such as the Flagstaff Rd upgrade, will deliver the upgrade at Hindmarsh.

Works are set to commence within weeks with completion scheduled for early next year.

About 30 jobs will be supported during construction.
https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sou ... 327fcca1fe
Some simple improvements to cycling in this layout would make a phenomenal difference.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

User avatar
[Shuz]
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3290
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Other Transport Projects

#712 Post by [Shuz] » Mon Jul 08, 2024 5:21 pm

It's a great improvement on what it currently is, however it still doesn't resolve the issue that most of the morning peak hour traffic coming in along Grange Road / Manton Street ends up turning right onto Port Road.

There's still a bottleneck just a tad further up the road along Adam Street where traffic coming from the two "Grange Road" lanes end up crossing over the two straight lanes (destined for the ring route) still need to cross over into the turning lanes for Port Road. Sometimes if the peak hour is that bad, traffic builds up on the middle lane, blocking the traffic who need to get onto the ring route.

There's a solution, but it'd probably add another $15m on the price tag.

The westbound Grange Road traffic gets slightly rerouted through the carpark adjacent to the river. The eastbound Manton Street traffic gets an additional 2 lanes turning traffic for those heading onto Port Road that starts before the Adam Street intersection. That way the divergence is sorted out before the conflict point.
Attachments
4fc300a88e83e4de9a46e2baed6bfe2a.jpeg
Solution
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests