[SWP] Lot 14 (Old RAH Site)

[Spurdo]

so in a nutshell the west end of North Tce will be big pharma precinct while the east end will be military industrial complex precinct

the future of the Australian economy

Do you whinge this much irl? If so, no wonder you’re always on the internet

[abc]

so in a nutshell the west end of North Tce will be big pharma precinct while the east end will be military industrial complex precinct

the future of the Australian economy

Do you whinge this much irl? If so, no wonder you’re always on the internet

you're the one whingeing

I'm just pointing out a fact

[Patrick_27]

Updated signage at Lot Fourteen now in place.

Really interesting to see how this precinct will come together behind North Terrace. Some further new buildings planned near the car park and access into the Botanical Garden.







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Honestly, before they build anything else down Frome Road, the SA Pathology and 'newer' section to the Helen Mayo building need to go. This precinct is getting to look as cluttered it was when the RAH was on the site. I would even advocate getting rid of the multi-level car-park, why does that area need that many carparks? Better yet, why do they need to come in the form of an obnoxious multi-storey building?

[SRW]

That's a pretty big access road compared to what was originally planned. It now interrupts the flow from the Innovation Centre to the supposed 'Central Park'. This Centre itself has an abysmal ground plane — why so much fencing and level changes?

I support the idea of encasing the car park with a new building, but on the proviso that the SA Pathology buildings are returned to open space so the park connects to Frome.

I note too some pretty significant changes (simplification?) to the design of Tarrkarri. Maybe it'll be cheaper to build. For reference:

[Spurdo]

you're the one whingeing

I'm just pointing out a fact

Don’t be an smartarse, everyone here knows exactly what you were trying to do.

[abc]

you're the one whingeing

I'm just pointing out a fact

Don’t be an smartarse, everyone here knows exactly what you were trying to do.

now you're insulting me

[AndyWelsh]

I note too some pretty significant changes (simplification?) to the design of Tarrkarri. Maybe it'll be cheaper to build. For reference:

Feels like we’ve gone back to the sharper lines of the original concept. In 2021 that was updated with rounder more “basket-like forms” following community consultation (see link) and now this latest render.




https://architectureau.com/articles/new ... e%20ground.”

If we go further back, remember these from the art gallery competition of 2017 (?) and the national centre idea?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mpol02]

Of the top 3 the middle one is stunning. So of course it won’t happen

[mattblack]

you're the one whingeing

I'm just pointing out a fact

Don’t be an smartarse, everyone here knows exactly what you were trying to do.

now you're insulting me

Sigh .....

[rev]

I note too some pretty significant changes (simplification?) to the design of Tarrkarri. Maybe it'll be cheaper to build. For reference:

This should be built, but spun around with that amphitheatre type public space facing North Terrace, and those 'columns' that kind of meet the round brown area being a waterfall feature that's lit up at night with fountains like the fountains in the newer part of Vic Square but better.

[rhino]

I note too some pretty significant changes (simplification?) to the design of Tarrkarri. Maybe it'll be cheaper to build. For reference:

This should be built, but spun around with that amphitheatre type public space facing North Terrace, and those 'columns' that kind of meet the round brown area being a waterfall feature that's lit up at night with fountains like the fountains in the newer part of Vic Square but better.

+1

[HiTouch]

As much as I want the curved design and agree with rev, it seems like it's going to look like this for a while unfortunately. The 2024 stakeholder report is way overdue, the 2023 stakeholder report was a one page government fun-fact sheet. Seems like the British Aerospace Systems are the political priority... ironic...

[abc]

As much as I want the curved design and agree with rev, it seems like it's going to look like this for a while unfortunately. The 2024 stakeholder report is way overdue, the 2023 stakeholder report was a one page government fun-fact sheet. Seems like the British Aerospace Systems are the political priority... ironic...

as I was saying...

[HiTouch]

As much as I want the curved design and agree with rev, it seems like it's going to look like this for a while unfortunately. The 2024 stakeholder report is way overdue, the 2023 stakeholder report was a one page government fun-fact sheet. Seems like the British Aerospace Systems are the political priority... ironic...

as I was saying...

The difference is that I am a nice person and not a Balrog from the depths of troll mountain.

[abc]

As much as I want the curved design and agree with rev, it seems like it's going to look like this for a while unfortunately. The 2024 stakeholder report is way overdue, the 2023 stakeholder report was a one page government fun-fact sheet. Seems like the British Aerospace Systems are the political priority... ironic...

as I was saying...

The difference is that I am a nice person and not a Balrog from the depths of troll mountain.

nice people aren't hostile as you