Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
rhino
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
- Location: Nairne
#571
Post
by rhino » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:53 am
fast_forward wrote:
I thought that this building only had above ground parking. From what I can see on the plans, the entrance on Gilbert Place would have a foyer entry and have cafes spilling out onto the street.
Looking back, you're right about the carparking being above ground - still a shame to have to lose the old warehouse (which looks like it is still being used, though not as a warehouse) to make way for it though.
As for the cafes and entrance on Gilbert Place, didn't the original proposal not include the buildings on Gilbert Place? I thought they were bought afterwards and the plan was then altered to include demolition of them.
cheers,
Rhino
-
Tyler_Durden
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:11 pm
#572
Post
by Tyler_Durden » Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:48 am
frank1 wrote:Tyler_Durden wrote:frank1 wrote:I think they should just built it and loose the lane way, so be it. Adelaide has plenty of character and other nice lane ways. If we keep saying this about every lane way, no new developments will ever get built.
Ridiculous comment. Thankfully the people on the City council have far more intelligence and good taste than you.
Gilbert Street is one of the absoute gems of Adelaide. Name all these laneways that are comparable to Gilbert. If anything Adelaide has far too few of these types of streets. There is no reason this building can't get built while maintaining (or enhancing if done right) the charm and character of two of Adelaide's great little streets.
What's intelligence got to do with personal taste? I don't call you stupid for your opinion about it being a gem. All i can say is the council is too touchy and conservative.
Lack of intelligence for suggesting we just get rid of an existing road simply because "Adelaide has plenty of other laneways" and lack of taste because you would actually wish to lose such interesting streets uneccesarily. I didn't say those characteristics were related but in this case they both apply to your comments.
And it's true, you didn't have a go at me for my opinion but you are having a go at the council for their opinions. What's the difference?
Anyway, I shall move on.
-
AtD
- VIP Member
- Posts: 4579
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
#573
Post
by AtD » Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:13 pm
rhino wrote:
As for the cafes and entrance on Gilbert Place, didn't the original proposal not include the buildings on Gilbert Place? I thought they were bought afterwards and the plan was then altered to include demolition of them.
The original building included some but not all of the buildings. The neighbouring building's tenants opposed the development quite vocally, so the developer brought the building and now proposes to demolish it.
-
fast_forward
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:05 pm
#574
Post
by fast_forward » Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:11 pm
This is in the DAP agenda for next week. The aganda is on the ACC website. Looks like the developer is still going to demolish the old buildings.
-
Shuz
- Banned
- Posts: 2538
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
- Location: Glandore
#575
Post
by Shuz » Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:15 pm
YAY! Please go through and approve it. It's in the city's best interests. *Puppy face*
-
Will
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5864
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#576
Post
by Will » Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:52 pm
This development will once again come before the ACC this coming Monday.
The developers have taken into consideration the council's request to incorporate the buildings along Gilbert Place and Peel Street into the facade. However the developers have expressed that incorporating such structures would be too difficult and require great alterations to the proposed building. Furthermore as it currently stands the current buildings do not interact well with the street. The same cannot be said about the proposed tower, which will incorporate tenancies at the ground floor which can accomodate cafe or restaurants.
However, the developers have ammended the proposed development.
There will be a change in the material used for the podium façades. Instead of white marble, the building will now be clad in smooth sandstone. The facade will have split face sandstone inlays running horizontally through the façade with additional dark bronzed anodised aluminium panels running vertically.
Furthermore the podium levels to both Peel Street and Gilbert Place have been broken up into 2 parts, with different heights to better reflect the heights of the other buildings in the locallity.
As such, the revised proposal should receive PLANNING APPROVAL by the ACC this Monday.
-
Omicron
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm
#577
Post
by Omicron » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:31 am
Shuz wrote:YAY! Please go through and approve it. It's in the city's best interests. *Puppy face*
-
Omicron
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm
#578
Post
by Omicron » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:35 am
Will wrote:This development will once again come before the ACC this coming Monday.
However the developers have expressed that incorporating such structures would be too difficult and require great alterations to the proposed building. Furthermore as it currently stands the current buildings do not interact well with the street. The same cannot be said about the proposed tower, which will incorporate tenancies at the ground floor which can accomodate cafe or restaurants.
I agree. The alterations required to the existing buildings in Gilbert Place will be quite substantial at ground-floor level to achieve the same pedestrian traffic as that proposed in the existing plan.
-
Edgar
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 985
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Adelaide
-
Contact:
#579
Post
by Edgar » Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:03 am
I have yet to see any renders of what the podium would look like let alone the facades.
All I took notice of the proposals and renders are the glasses and the wave curve towards the top of the building. Am I missing something here? Does anyone have the renders of the podium or entrance?
-
Omicron
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm
#580
Post
by Omicron » Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:55 pm
Edgar wrote:I have yet to see any renders of what the podium would look like let alone the facades.
All I took notice of the proposals and renders are the glasses and the wave curve towards the top of the building. Am I missing something here? Does anyone have the renders of the podium or entrance?
http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/Netc ... Part_2.pdf
-
Edgar
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 985
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Adelaide
-
Contact:
#581
Post
by Edgar » Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:24 am
Omicron wrote:Edgar wrote:I have yet to see any renders of what the podium would look like let alone the facades.
All I took notice of the proposals and renders are the glasses and the wave curve towards the top of the building. Am I missing something here? Does anyone have the renders of the podium or entrance?
http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/Netc ... Part_2.pdf
error.
-
AtD
- VIP Member
- Posts: 4579
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
#582
Post
by AtD » Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:45 pm
Look a few pages back in the thread, they've been posted more than once by me alone.
-
Wayno
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#583
Post
by Wayno » Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:17 pm
Will wrote:
<snip>
As such, the revised proposal should receive PLANNING APPROVAL by the ACC this Monday.
Anyone going to the ACC meeting today? i'm itching to know if this gets approved...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6485
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#584
Post
by Norman » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:40 pm
Wayno wrote:Will wrote:
<snip>
As such, the revised proposal should receive PLANNING APPROVAL by the ACC this Monday.
Anyone going to the ACC meeting today? i'm itching to know if this gets approved...
When and where is it?
-
Wayno
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#585
Post
by Wayno » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:49 pm
Norman wrote:Wayno wrote:Will wrote:
<snip>
As such, the revised proposal should receive PLANNING APPROVAL by the ACC this Monday.
Anyone going to the ACC meeting today? i'm itching to know if this gets approved...
When and where is it?
Meeting to be held in the Colonel Light Room, Town Hall, Adelaide, at 5.30pm. here's the agenda:
http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/Netc ... _18DAP.pdf
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests