COM: Glenelg Tramline Upgrade

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1966 Post by Norman » Fri May 09, 2008 7:47 pm

Wayno wrote:Appears the tram overpass will be built well after the south rd/anzac hwy underpass is complete :-( is this true?
No, this will start early next year and will be completed at the end of next year... close to the completion date of the South Road/Anzac Highway Underpass.

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1967 Post by jk1237 » Fri May 09, 2008 8:27 pm

The overpass design looks great. Now if they built something similar at Goodwood Rd, they could get rid of this Transport SA rule of no more than 1 tram per 5 mins at level crossings, and we could have trams every 3-5 mins in peak hour to Glenelg or halfway.
The idea of adding an extra section to the flexities has gone quiet. I wonder if there will be talk of this in the next budget, which has signs of spending on rail/public transport.

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1968 Post by Shuz » Fri May 09, 2008 8:36 pm

Not to mention Marion/Cross roads needs an underpass/overpass also. East Ave, Beckman St and Morphett Road would be the only level crossings.

paul
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:36 am

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1969 Post by paul » Fri May 09, 2008 9:11 pm

Looks like the span isn't wide enough to allow South Road to be expanded to 3 lanes each way which seems a little short sighted....

Apart from that it's a great looking design.

muzzamo
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 4:44 pm

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1970 Post by muzzamo » Wed May 14, 2008 10:06 am

I think its only concept art at the moment - maybe you should express your concerns as part of their consultation process?

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1971 Post by Ho Really » Wed May 14, 2008 11:00 am

paul wrote:Looks like the span isn't wide enough to allow South Road to be expanded to 3 lanes each way which seems a little short sighted....

Apart from that it's a great looking design.
and
muzzamo wrote:I think its only concept art at the moment - maybe you should express your concerns as part of their consultation process?
But why confuse the public? Do they actually want the public to point this out to them? :?

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
Adamo
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:45 am
Location: Singapore, Adelaide

Re: #Completed : Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1972 Post by Adamo » Thu May 15, 2008 9:50 pm

Just curious if a city west loop were to occur and loop back to victoria square will they remove the single track section on north tce?
http://twitter.com//tarcobello
http://mrpianoman.com
'we've had some times i wouldn't trade for the world..'
Rise Against

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #Completed : Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1973 Post by monotonehell » Thu May 15, 2008 11:48 pm

Adamo wrote:Just curious if a city west loop were to occur and loop back to victoria square will they remove the single track section on north tce?
Remove? It's just a terminus to allow the tram to reverse direction and switch tracks. So if the track were to be extended they'd add two tracks all the way around I guess. Unless they go for a single track with a unidirectional service or single shuttle to save space.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: #Completed : Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1974 Post by AG » Fri May 16, 2008 6:57 am

monotonehell wrote:
Adamo wrote:Just curious if a city west loop were to occur and loop back to victoria square will they remove the single track section on north tce?
Remove? It's just a terminus to allow the tram to reverse direction and switch tracks. So if the track were to be extended they'd add two tracks all the way around I guess. Unless they go for a single track with a unidirectional service or single shuttle to save space.
It's not likely that a single track extension would be constructed, particularly if a decent frequency of services is required to run the line. This is one of the same issues causing capacity limitations on the Belair Line.

paul
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:36 am

Re: #Completed : Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1975 Post by paul » Fri May 16, 2008 7:16 pm

Just a thought - this particular design (ie. an elevated station built as part of the bridge structure) could work where the tram crosses the rail lines at Goodwood and create a proper tram/train interchange with Goodwood rail station...

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

Re: #Completed : Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1976 Post by skyliner » Sat May 17, 2008 10:32 am

I've often thought that too - great idea.

Way back in the 1970's when, of course, there was no interchange, I thought designers must have run against finance issues/resistance. (if the idea even surfaced at all between 1929 and the 70's).

ADELAIDE - CITY ON THE MOVE
Jack.

User avatar
adam73837
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 416
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: The wilderness being sustained by nutrients in the air and powering my laptop with positive energy

Re: #Completed : Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1977 Post by adam73837 » Sun May 18, 2008 5:02 pm

Despite the fact that this looks like a pretty good proposal, I bet that it will be scaled down so much by protestors that the Governmnet will have no choice but to leave it as it is because it ruins the skyscape of the area.
BTW, I'm not critising the Government on this one, I'm stating the fact that the conservative minorities are going to probably win this one too. Let's hope not though.
I take back many of the things I said before 2010; particularly my anti-Rann rants. While I still maintain some of said opinions, I feel I could have been less arrogant. I also apologise to people I offended; while knowing I can't fully take much back. :)

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: #Completed : Glenelg Tram Line Upgrade

#1978 Post by AtD » Sun May 18, 2008 6:51 pm

adam73837 wrote:Despite the fact that this looks like a pretty good proposal, I bet that it will be scaled down so much by protestors that the Governmnet will have no choice but to leave it as it is because it ruins the skyscape of the area.
BTW, I'm not critising the Government on this one, I'm stating the fact that the conservative minorities are going to probably win this one too. Let's hope not though.
I doubt it. There's already the Cross Road overpass just up the road.

BillD
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:57 pm

Glenelg line tamping complete

#1979 Post by BillD » Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:47 am

In the early hours of Monday morning (30th of June), we find the tamper ouside Glengowrie depot. It and the ballast regulator are about to cross over to the up track before making a short trip to a ninety ton limit crane which is waiting outside Morphettville racecourse.

Image

Heavy lift !

Image

Bill

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Glenelg line tamping complete

#1980 Post by Norman » Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:41 pm

I'm having a ride on the Glenelg Tram later to check the new track quality. Thanks for the photos Bill.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest