ONH: [Port Adelaide] Newport Quays | $1.2b

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
User avatar
Xaragmata
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1613
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Adelaide / West
Contact:

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#421 Post by Xaragmata » Sun May 04, 2008 6:35 pm

Ho Really wrote:
jk1237 wrote:someone on the railpage forum reckons the first ever train will cross the new opening bridge this Sunday arvo at 5pm (the old stonie train from Barossa). Didnt even know it was close to being finished. Once the bridge is fully operational, no more
Well if that's the case maybe someone here should be there to take some (history making) piccies.

Cheers
I was tempted to go, but probably would have missed it - 9 News showed 2214 as light engine crossing bridge, but apparently
this morning, while I was still thinking about it. Beautiful footage, which I didn't record. Normal services expected later this
month.

User avatar
rogue
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:45 am
Location: Over here

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#422 Post by rogue » Mon May 05, 2008 12:35 pm

I was waiting around like a stunned mullet about 5pm with a few others. I went home and watched the news to learn that it happened in the morning. Spewin!!!

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#423 Post by crawf » Sat May 31, 2008 12:06 am

Wow, this is pretty exciting news. Potentially our new tallest building in Adelaide? (outside the CBD)

Tower, shops added to port
ANTIMO IANELLA
May 30, 2008 07:30pm
A 14-STOREY tower is among four apartment buildings in the revised design for the next stage of the $2 billion Newport Quays development.

The third stage of the Port Adelaide waterfront redevelopment project, worth $300 million, will feature about 500 homes – up from 421 in the previous design – and 100 marina berths.

The three 12-storey towers in the original design have been reduced to seven and nine storeys in height.

A high-density, 14-storey "iconic" building has been added. The new proposal also includes more cafe, dining and retail space, improved environmental features and a greater focus on the Port's heritage.

The amended plans were lodged with the Development Assessment Commission yesterday.

Newport Quays spokesman Todd Brown said the new design took into account concerns raised about the original proposal.

"We have spent a lot of time making sure we got it right," Mr Brown said.

"We think the new design is going to leave a great legacy for Port Adelaide and South Australia. It's stunning."

The Newport Quays consortium, made up of developers Urban Construct and Multiplex Living, have reworked the original proposal following criticism from Port Adelaide Enfield Council, residents and the National Trust over the size and scale of the project.

The new design will be released to the public soon and a decision is expected in about 10 weeks.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#424 Post by Norman » Sat May 31, 2008 1:02 am

Ohh pleeese, accept it. It will make the port just that more attractive.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#425 Post by Omicron » Sat May 31, 2008 1:26 am

Sounds promising. I'm looking forward to seeing the new plans!

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#426 Post by AG » Sat May 31, 2008 7:59 am

It's great that Urban Construct has considered adding more facilities that would encourage use of the new waterfront by the public. I'm reserving further judgement until Urban Construct releases the plans. Although I would not be surprised if there was still public opposition to the one planned high-rise building, it really shouldn't be as great an issue as many people make it out to be.

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#427 Post by crawf » Sat May 31, 2008 8:04 am

Yeah as much its great to hear Urban Construct is now proposing a 14lv apartment tower for Port Adelaide, I am more happy to hear that there will be more commercial space for retail outlets, cafes, restaurants etc aswell as a greater focus on the port's heritage.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#428 Post by Will » Sat May 31, 2008 9:00 am

My initial reaction is disappointment at the removal of the 3 x 12 level buildings. However I await renders, until I make further comments, because on the other hand it sounds like the new proposal will be more attractive from the ground.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#429 Post by AG » Sat May 31, 2008 9:34 am

Now that I look in the actual paper today, there is already a render of the new design as an overview of the four apartment buildings. The 3 shorter buildings look quite ordinary, but the taller 14 level building looks a bit better than the previous proposal. Hard to tell what will exist at ground level for the public from the render though.

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#430 Post by crawf » Sat May 31, 2008 10:05 am

It doesn't look to bad, the 14lv tower is the nicest though.

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#431 Post by Cruise » Sat May 31, 2008 2:20 pm

i wouldn't get to exicted about this, i can't see it happening tbh

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#432 Post by crawf » Sat May 31, 2008 2:57 pm

They said the same about Holdfast Shores, Airport Terminal, Tramline extension...

Anything is possible in this city

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#433 Post by Will » Sat May 31, 2008 3:50 pm

I am bitterly disappointed by the latest design. In short all the new buildings look bland to the extreme. There is nothing stunning or visually interesting about it, even the so-called 'iconic' 14 level tower. It appears that the latest stage is yet another second rate compromise design. Just like what happened with the last stage of Holdfast Shores is happening all over again. I am sure that when constructed the NIMBY groups which campaigned so passionately against the previous design will have wished they could tun back time. This is another case of be careful what you wish for.

The previous design had an iconic tower, a true landmark. The sexy curved tower sitting over the water was a genuine landmark.

Image

Image


Now we are left with 4 bland boxes. How mediocre designs respect the heritage of the Port, I don't know.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#434 Post by AtD » Sat May 31, 2008 5:14 pm

Could someone please scan it in so I can place them on my map? Cheers.

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: #Redevelopment - Port Adelaide Waterfront $1.2billion

#435 Post by Norman » Sat May 31, 2008 7:16 pm

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 1 guest