[CAN] 20-22 Currie St | 123m | 31lvls | Office

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#736 Post by skyliner » Sat May 31, 2008 11:58 am

Just reading the mining thread is enough for me to believe this development will not be all that far off.Also read of more mining out near Ceduna (minieral sands rutile etc) that will shift the mineral sand centre to SA (in the Fin REview).Also in the Fin REview was an article on office vacancy rates and hotel development and occupancy rates - stated not much available - mineral boom will shift this. Demand for the likes of Currie St rising.

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Jack.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#737 Post by Wayno » Sat May 31, 2008 12:01 pm

skyliner wrote:Just reading the mining thread is enough for me to believe this development will not be all that far off.Also read of more mining out near Ceduna (minieral sands rutile etc) that will shift the mineral sand centre to SA (in the Fin REview).Also in the Fin REview was an article on office vacancy rates and hotel development and occupancy rates - stated not much available - mineral boom will shift this. Demand for the likes of Currie St rising.

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
yep, agree. i'm a strong believer in WHEN (not IF) this one will start...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

NIMBY23
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 6:42 pm

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#738 Post by NIMBY23 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:50 pm

You can forget about this one going ahead. This building was first proposed nearly 18 months ago. If a company
/ government department was interested in this building then something would have happened by now.
This user is banned, please use caution when dealing with this member.

NIMBY23
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 6:42 pm

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#739 Post by NIMBY23 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:51 pm

You can forget about this one going ahead. This building was first proposed nearly 18 months ago. If a company
/ government department was interested in this building then something would have happened by now.
This user is banned, please use caution when dealing with this member.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#740 Post by Will » Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:01 pm

NIMBY23 wrote:You can forget about this one going ahead. This building was first proposed nearly 18 months ago. If a company
/ government department was interested in this building then something would have happened by now.
Thank you for gracing us with your expert opinion. :wank:

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#741 Post by Norman » Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:25 pm

Why the negative stance on everything?

cruel_world00
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#742 Post by cruel_world00 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:41 pm

NIMBY23 wrote:You can forget about this one going ahead. This building was first proposed nearly 18 months ago. If a company
/ government department was interested in this building then something would have happened by now.

Welcome to the internet, try to keep your double posting to a minimum

UrbanSG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:55 am

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#743 Post by UrbanSG » Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:56 pm

That's why we have proposed, approved and under construction status listed for projects. It's not rocket science!

The vision section deals with 'dream' projects. Most of the ones you listed will most likely go ahead.

User avatar
Howie
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4874
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#744 Post by Howie » Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:58 pm

Please try to stay on topic Nimby. If you've got any further news on this tower feel free to post.. this thread is reserved for new news regarding the currie street tower... questions about demand etc have been covered numerous times.

frank1
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 439
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:54 pm

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#745 Post by frank1 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:13 pm

NIMBY23 wrote:Is it possible to have a separate section on this website called Dream Projects ??

This section can include pie in the sky projects that will never go ahead. It can include :

1) 123m tower for currie street.
2) Inner city stadium
3) Twin towers at Glenelg.
4) Latitude at Glenelg.
5) Rail link to west lakes.

Currently this website is diluted with dream projects and putting them in there own section will make
the site more realistic and practical.
Is this really because there is no interest in theses projects, or because you don't want them to go ahead because they represent a changing adelaide?

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#746 Post by AG » Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:15 pm

NIMBY23 wrote:You can forget about this one going ahead. This building was first proposed nearly 18 months ago. If a company
/ government department was interested in this building then something would have happened by now.
If that is your way of thinking then you obviously haven't got a clue in the world about financial markets, the property market or the construction industry. A new building is not an event, it is a process that can take years. The John Boyd backed office building in Sydney is only now about to commence construction after being proposed for several years. Even more extreme than that, there is a building in Shanghai that was proposed in 1996, but it has only just been completed in the past month.

I don't know what your agenda is exactly, but it seems to be driven by emotion or fear of some sort rather than proper thinking and acknowledging the facts.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#747 Post by AtD » Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:30 pm

NIMBY23 wrote:You can forget about this one going ahead. This building was first proposed nearly 18 months ago. If a company
/ government department was interested in this building then something would have happened by now.
You're an idiot, 18 months is nothing! Conservatory on Hindmarsh took three years before work took place and it's half the size of this.

Go troll elsewhere.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7566
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#748 Post by Ben » Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:33 am

Will wrote:
NIMBY23 wrote:You can forget about this one going ahead. This building was first proposed nearly 18 months ago. If a company
/ government department was interested in this building then something would have happened by now.
Thank you for gracing us with your expert opinion. :wank:
It was proposed 12 months ago and the amended design was approved less then 5 months ago....

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#749 Post by Ho Really » Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:28 am

Ben wrote:
Will wrote:
NIMBY23 wrote:You can forget about this one going ahead. This building was first proposed nearly 18 months ago. If a company
/ government department was interested in this building then something would have happened by now.
Thank you for gracing us with your expert opinion. :wank:
It was proposed 12 months ago and the amended design was approved less then 5 months ago....
The idea would have been around a little longer than 12 months, but regardless of how long it has taken NIMBY23, this project only needs a half decent tenant and it will go ahead.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

[CAN] Re: #Approved: 20-22 Currie St - 123m, 31 lvls

#750 Post by skyliner » Tue Jun 03, 2008 6:18 pm

NIMBY23 wrote:You can forget about this one going ahead. This building was first proposed nearly 18 months ago. If a company
/ government department was interested in this building then something would have happened by now.
Can't leave response to this any longer!

Nimby23, I appreciate all have the right to express their opinions, but this one is an UNSUBSTANTIATED emotive statement with a wide reaching end in mind.

In my experience of valid discussion, EVIDENCE is the crux of the issue. Your post was 2 posts on from mine. I stated (from the evidence of the mining thread) that this building was more than likely to eventuate soon.What was your evidence?? Did you read that thread? Check index page,go to regional developments, mining .

I have been honoured with the company of these guys here on this site due to their overall credibility and research. Personally I have been closely following Adelaide CBD/rail dev't for 35 years through my own research as well and found it to match up with what is on this site. You'll go a long way to find better, more comprehensive and positive info on Adelaide and SA.

Before you make such bald statements, do your H/W and tell us about it then.

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Jack.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Plasmatron and 2 guests