Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
Will409
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
- Location: Parafield Gardens
#272
Post
by Will409 » Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:20 pm
C'mon TransAdelaide, surely your resources aren't that stretched that you can't make a new timetable to the new format! That is pathetic. As an additional minor gripe, the route map doesn't show the station as having moved any closer to the level crossing and instead is still in it's previous position.
LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.
-
Cruise
- Banned
- Posts: 2209
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
- Location: Bay 115, Football Park
#273
Post
by Cruise » Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:28 pm
Why didn't they go to the same style as the gawler line timetable?
-
Shuz
- Banned
- Posts: 2539
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
- Location: Glandore
#275
Post
by Shuz » Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:46 pm
Cheers Norm.
Having been through the station twice recently, I am overwhelmingly impressed with the lighting of the structure by night-time. It really improves visibility and safety in the area. I definetly believe that this is the standard that all hi-frequency stations should be up to - and I will be curious to see how the Parafield makeover turns out, whether thats an appropriate standard for the rest of the networks stations.
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#276
Post
by Norman » Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:33 pm
Will posted an update on Parafield in the relavent thread
-
jk1237
- Donating Member
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#277
Post
by jk1237 » Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:51 pm
great pics Norman.
Quick question, I can post 2 of your pics on skyscrapercity?
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#278
Post
by Norman » Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:41 pm
Go for it. All my photos can be used for whatever.
-
muzzamo
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 4:44 pm
#279
Post
by muzzamo » Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:54 am
Norman wrote:Go for it. All my photos can be used for whatever.
You should remove the watermark then add licence details to your site so that they can be nabbed and used on wikipedia
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#280
Post
by Norman » Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:24 pm
muzzamo wrote:Norman wrote:Go for it. All my photos can be used for whatever.
You should remove the watermark then add licence details to your site so that they can be nabbed and used on wikipedia
I still do want the credit for the photos. But watermarked they can be used anywhere. I've had issues of people stealing my work without permission, including News.com.au, where they stole a few videos off my YouTube channel.
-
Pat28
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 4:42 pm
#281
Post
by Pat28 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:55 pm
Norman wrote:'ve had issues of people stealing my work without permission, including News.com.au, where they stole a few videos off my YouTube channel.
Ouch, well what can you say, it is the 'Tiser they need something reliable once in a while. Keep up the work Norman.
Besser Verkehr in den Bergen
-
muzzamo
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 4:44 pm
#282
Post
by muzzamo » Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:58 pm
Norman wrote:I still do want the credit for the photos. But watermarked they can be used anywhere. I've had issues of people stealing my work without permission, including News.com.au, where they stole a few videos off my YouTube channel.
Fair enough.. For wikipedia they would have to have the watermark removed and an appropriate free licence.
-
Norman
- Donating Member
- Posts: 6488
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm
#283
Post
by Norman » Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:02 pm
muzzamo wrote:Norman wrote:I still do want the credit for the photos. But watermarked they can be used anywhere. I've had issues of people stealing my work without permission, including News.com.au, where they stole a few videos off my YouTube channel.
Fair enough.. For wikipedia they would have to have the watermark removed and an appropriate free licence.
Just message me if you need a photo, I'll be happy to oblige.
-
jlimty
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:08 pm
#284
Post
by jlimty » Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:48 pm
Shuz wrote:Cheers Norm.
Having been through the station twice recently, I am overwhelmingly impressed with the lighting of the structure by night-time. It really improves visibility and safety in the area. I definetly believe that this is the standard that all hi-frequency stations should be up to - and I will be curious to see how the Parafield makeover turns out, whether thats an appropriate standard for the rest of the networks stations.
Totally agree mate. I was just driving past last night after a movie at Marion and the illumination of the station really stood out. My girlfriend even commented "All the train stations should look like that"
-
skyliner
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
- Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)
#285
Post
by skyliner » Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:35 pm
The lighting is particularly impressive in those pics - puts Adelaide central to shame.
Question - do ANY suburban trains go over 3 units in length? Is the length governed by frequency cutting out the need or is it controlled by platform length.
Even when I was in Adelaide they occasionally ran 5 coaches together.Would you believe they ONCE they ran 7 coach trains to Largs - have piccies to prove it. As yet i have yet to learn how to put them on this site with the current computer - almost totally full.
ADELAIDE - CITY ON THE MOVE
Jack.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests