Starbucks to go?

Anything goes here.. :) Now with Beer Garden for our smoking patrons.
Message
Author
User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: Starbucks to go?

#16 Post by monotonehell » Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:52 pm

Every time they show that Starbuck's employee yoyoing the jug of milk up and down when trying to steam the milk I cringe. That's one of the top three milk steaming no-nos. Pfft Starbucks don't even train their staff correctly.

Hopefully all the people employed there get jobs elsewhere. :( (somewhere where they train them to make coffee that doesn't taste like ass preferably)
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2201
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: Starbucks to go?

#17 Post by Cruise » Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:47 pm

monotonehell wrote: :( (somewhere where they train them to make coffee that doesn't taste like ass preferably)
So for all those that like coffee that tastes like ass, were will they go?

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2201
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: Starbucks to go?

#18 Post by Cruise » Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:49 pm

jk1237 wrote:now I did see a rumour on SSC that Hudson's maybe taking over most of the closed Starbucks stores
Yeah It happened in Ballina apareantly lol

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: Starbucks to go?

#19 Post by monotonehell » Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:50 pm

Cruise wrote:
monotonehell wrote: :( (somewhere where they train them to make coffee that doesn't taste like ass preferably)
So for all those that like coffee that tastes like ass, were will they go?
McDonalds.

I just realised that QueenAnne is sitting at the Starbuck's source, Seattle. *waves*
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Hoops
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:49 pm

Re: Starbucks to go?

#20 Post by Hoops » Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:43 pm

monotonehell wrote:Every time they show that Starbuck's employee yoyoing the jug of milk up and down when trying to steam the milk I cringe. That's one of the top three milk steaming no-nos. Pfft Starbucks don't even train their staff correctly.

Hopefully all the people employed there get jobs elsewhere. :( (somewhere where they train them to make coffee that doesn't taste like ass preferably)

The On the Run Coffee highups were handing out business cards this morning there,

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: Starbucks to go?

#21 Post by Omicron » Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:53 pm

Hoops wrote:
monotonehell wrote:Every time they show that Starbuck's employee yoyoing the jug of milk up and down when trying to steam the milk I cringe. That's one of the top three milk steaming no-nos. Pfft Starbucks don't even train their staff correctly.

Hopefully all the people employed there get jobs elsewhere. :( (somewhere where they train them to make coffee that doesn't taste like ass preferably)

The On the Run Coffee highups were handing out business cards this morning there,
Erk, from one cup of burnt slop to another.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3658
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

Re: Starbucks to go?

#22 Post by SRW » Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:54 pm

Pffpft. T Bar, anyone?
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
Will409
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:12 am
Location: Parafield Gardens

Re: Starbucks to go?

#23 Post by Will409 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:33 am

None of this affects me even the slightest, wanna know why (Norman already knows!)

Image
Image LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7574
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Starbucks to go?

#24 Post by Ben » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:40 am

I heard a rumour that hear in SA, Bean Bar will take over the Starbucks stores. This is good news as it is a local brand so the dollars stay here rather then go interstate or even overseas.

loud
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:25 pm

Re: Starbucks to go?

#25 Post by loud » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:39 am

Ben wrote:I heard a rumour that hear in SA, Bean Bar will take over the Starbucks stores. This is good news as it is a local brand so the dollars stay here rather then go interstate or even overseas.
They may have negotiated first rights to the sites, but i doubt that they will be able to take up every store due to the fact that they may already be located there... for instance bean bar is located in City Cross just off James Place and the Starbucks is just down James Place... hardly seems worth moving...

User avatar
Queen Anne
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 312
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:32 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Starbucks to go?

#26 Post by Queen Anne » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:49 am

monotonehell wrote:
Cruise wrote:
monotonehell wrote: :( (somewhere where they train them to make coffee that doesn't taste like ass preferably)
So for all those that like coffee that tastes like ass, were will they go?
McDonalds.

I just realised that QueenAnne is sitting at the Starbuck's source, Seattle. *waves*
Hello :) *waving back*

Yes, it's pretty interesting to watch this unfold here in Seattle. Starbucks is getting a lot of attention in the news here, understandably. Quite a lot of people here in Seattle are angry with Howard Schulz (sp?), the Starbucks guy, because he owned the, 40 year old, Seattle Sonics basketball team and sold it to an Oklahoma City business man who, of course, took the team to Oklahoma. So feelings are mixed here, on the one hand Seattle is not keen to see its coffee empire suffer, on the other hand, they don't seem to like the guy who fronts it very much.

The news here has also been focussing on the fact that this company had stores literally across the street from each other. How could that possibly be a recipe for success? They also owned places here called Seattle's Best Coffee, it seems like ridiculous saturation.

Anyway, that's just a bit of trivia, from the source :) I guess I should let this discussion get back to what it means for Adelaide, though I am tempted to write an essay on all the shocking hot beverages we have found here (said through love and concern, America). Okay, I do admit I have found a couple of quite decent coffee places, but I mean literally, two :shock:

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6485
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Starbucks to go?

#27 Post by Norman » Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:19 am

Queen Anne wrote:Yes, it's pretty interesting to watch this unfold here in Seattle. Starbucks is getting a lot of attention in the news here, understandably. Quite a lot of people here in Seattle are angry with Howard Schulz (sp?), the Starbucks guy, because he owned the, 40 year old, Seattle Sonics basketball team and sold it to an Oklahoma City business man who, of course, took the team to Oklahoma. So feelings are mixed here, on the one hand Seattle is not keen to see its coffee empire suffer, on the other hand, they don't seem to like the guy who fronts it very much.
Reminds me of a Simpsons episode for some reason... :P

cruel_world00
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am

Re: Starbucks to go?

#28 Post by cruel_world00 » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:27 pm

In other coffee news, Illy on North Terrace (across from University of Adelaide) has re branded. Strange.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7574
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Starbucks to go?

#29 Post by Ben » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:38 pm

cruel_world00 wrote:In other coffee news, Illy on North Terrace (across from University of Adelaide) has re branded. Strange.
What is it now?

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Starbucks to go?

#30 Post by AtD » Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:51 pm

Queen Anne wrote:The news here has also been focussing on the fact that this company had stores literally across the street from each other. How could that possibly be a recipe for success?
It's amazing how common that is, especially for businesses that mostly get impulse-buys from passing motor traffic. I can only think of one example in SA, being two Woolworths at Sefton Park staring at each other over Main North Road, just to keep south-bound traffic from going to Coles. It's very common in the eastern states around roads where it's hard to turn right or for pedestrians to cross.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests