[COM] Victoria Square Upgrade - $24m

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
cruel_world00
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:54 am

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#391 Post by cruel_world00 » Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:53 am

Will wrote:If anyone has had the pleasure of entering the Sir Samuel Way Building, it immediately dawns upon you that its current role is not allowing the building to live up to its greatest potential. They say that the Queen Victoria Building in Sydney is the prettiest shopping centre in Australia, however once you have had a view inside of the Sir Samuel Way Building and in particular its majestice marble staircase and dome, you think to yourself that if done correctly, we could have the prettiest shopping centre of them all in Victoria Square!

What do they use it for right now? And what is stopping this so called vision that you speak of?

User avatar
rogue
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:45 am
Location: Over here

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#392 Post by rogue » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:28 am

^ Currently used by the Supreme Court. I cant imagine they would be vacating anytime soon.

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#393 Post by Shuz » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:37 am

In a perfect world - I'd encourage the Supreme Court to utilise the land adjacent the 2nd Supreme Court building which has been vacant for some time now within a new development - and try and get Myer to relocate its premises into the Samuel Way building, freeing up oppurtunity to properly utilise and rejuvenate the existing Myer Centre. (bulldozer keys please :P)

User avatar
Clr Yarwood
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:00 pm

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#394 Post by Clr Yarwood » Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:13 pm

Have a look at this eve’s strategy committee – there lies the design guidelines and timeframe for Vic Sq project.
Councillor Stephen Yarwood
Candidate for Lord Mayor
Adelaide City Council

http://www.StephenYarwood.com

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#395 Post by skyliner » Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:23 pm

Prince George wrote:If I could choose one of the surrounding buildings to change, it would be the Samuel Way building. It's not an unattractive building, but it not only adds no life to the square -- it actually manages to be a barrier between there and the market/Gouger street. When I think of that passage way that joins the market and the square ... what I wouldn't give to move the District Court elsewhere and repurpose the Samuel Way building to be a better connection between those parts of town.

And while I was thinking along these lines I found http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=289&c=601
This building known since the 1980s as the Sir Samuel Way building houses Adelaide's Local District Courts but the visitor would find it hard to believe that the building was once a department store. Arthur Garlick and Herbert Louis Jackman were commissioned by Charles Moore to build this department store in Victoria Square in 1911. The building is made of reinforced concrete and was opened in 1916. Moore established his retail business in Victoria Square in the 1880s, breaking away from the city's retail centre in Rundle and Hindley Streets.
That seems like quite a loss - the square lost a department store and gained another courthouse.
I actually had the pleasure of going to that building as Moore's department store - absolutely amazing inside. It reeked of early 20th century retailing and gave an effective entry to the markets. It reminded me of the Grande Central Hotel - also seen before it lost it's charm and expression of grand elequence in high Victorian style.
Moores had an ice creamery at the top of the marble bannisters - I remember the overpowering presence of the dome as well. A BIG loss to Adelaide when it went - knew the key draftsman in the redesign of this for courts. Would be great to see reintroduction of retailing at Moores again.

ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Jack.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#396 Post by monotonehell » Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:13 pm

skyliner wrote:I actually had the pleasure of going to that building as Moore's department store - absolutely amazing inside. It reeked of early 20th century retailing and gave an effective entry to the markets. It reminded me of the Grande Central Hotel - also seen before it lost it's charm and expression of grand elequence in high Victorian style.
Moores had an ice creamery at the top of the marble bannisters - I remember the overpowering presence of the dome as well. A BIG loss to Adelaide when it went - knew the key draftsman in the redesign of this for courts. Would be great to see reintroduction of retailing at Moores again.

ADELAIDE - *snip* ;) A GREAT CITY SKYLINE !!
Now I thought the dome was added to make it a courts' building?

http://news.webshots.com/photo/22924215 ... 5966yTNjBD
http://news.webshots.com/photo/20149416 ... 5966JNQhQC
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#397 Post by Prince George » Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:37 am

I had managed to miss that the new SA water building is right on the square until just a couple of days ago. That's a fine building with excellent sustainability cred - but it would have been a fine building on almost any location. What it seems to have missed is incorporating the fact that it's been built against the central square of Adelaide. It's not clear to me what's going on at it's ground-level, other than the lobby for the benefit of the people in the building. I see that there was talk earlier of it having retail and cafes, but where are they going to be? And am I right to understand that the front entrance for the building is intended to be the one that faces into the courtyard between the building and the cathedral, rather than into the square?

I'm upset at the amount of planning for Vic Square that seems to assume the problems are all within the Square itself, and not in the context of everything that we're doing around it. This [SA Water] was only approved a couple of years ago, but we still seem to have missed making the new construction part of the solution for the square. Instead we've got a project [for Vic Square] that has a hard timeline to get a masterplan out by June next year and start breaking ground in 2010. Is that going to be enough time to include these surrounding buildings in the planning? It could take all that time to decide what to do with the traffic.

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#398 Post by Prince George » Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:30 pm

The council's website now has the "Guiding principles and vision" for Victoria Square up.

http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/scri ... =PC_151184

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#399 Post by Wayno » Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:58 pm

Prince George wrote:The council's website now has the "Guiding principles and vision" for Victoria Square up.

http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/scri ... =PC_151184
i love most of the pikkies in the guiding principles pdf - here's hoping we get something as good - i'm excited!!!
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#400 Post by AG » Wed Oct 15, 2008 4:09 pm

Prince George wrote: I'm upset at the amount of planning for Vic Square that seems to assume the problems are all within the Square itself, and not in the context of everything that we're doing around it. This [SA Water] was only approved a couple of years ago, but we still seem to have missed making the new construction part of the solution for the square. Instead we've got a project [for Vic Square] that has a hard timeline to get a masterplan out by June next year and start breaking ground in 2010. Is that going to be enough time to include these surrounding buildings in the planning? It could take all that time to decide what to do with the traffic.
From I can see there is an entrance from Victoria Square into the building. A lot of the buildings around the square really don't give much life to the square, as most of them have no ground floor retail and/or only serve their intended purpose during the daytime. The northwestern corner of the square shows a good example as to how the square could be redeveloped, but that corner on its own doesn't do much for the square as a whole.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#401 Post by monotonehell » Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:48 pm

AG wrote:From I can see there is an entrance from Victoria Square into the building. A lot of the buildings around the square really don't give much life to the square, as most of them have no ground floor retail and/or only serve their intended purpose during the daytime. The northwestern corner of the square shows a good example as to how the square could be redeveloped, but that corner on its own doesn't do much for the square as a whole.
Other than the pedestrian interface of the buildings surrounding the square -- the biggest hurdle to making the design resonate with pedestrian use is the isolation that the diamond of main roads and the square of minor roads give. The only exception to this is the NW corner as pointed out.

Now I had a cunning plan to solve this, that no one paid any attention to at the time. Maybe because I used crayons? ;)
I've actually had another idea since the deadline, drat. It might be a bit of a controversial one as people first look at it, but I've been thinking on the success of the layout of parts of Hindmarsh square and how they mesh with their surrounds because they are not isolated by traffic around their perimeter.

The ideas behind it are:
1 Through traffic is a reality, but tunnels are not possible due to the long run ups required.
2 For people to make daily use of it, it really needs to mesh with the surrounding buildings, be an extension of the activities at its perimeter.
3 To be a useful and functional space for special events it needs to be a large contiguous space.

Obviously points 1 and 3 are not compatible, unless we allow the roads to be roads most of the time, but close them off for events. To this end I've eradicated the diamond, there are no access roads at the perimeter (except a provision to allow taxis and dropoffs access to the Hilton's front door) instead KWS and Grote/Wakefield bisect the square on both axes. However they are not normal black top roads, whilst in the square they are differently paved roads (possibly those high wear pavers that they use in shared zones in Germany) the kerbs are also removed and replaced with flat style spoon gutters (like in Rundle Mall) in order to provide a completely flat surface. In this way the entire square can be cordoned during large events without anyone tripping over the gutters etc.

I was toying with the idea of a shared traffic/pedestrian space in the orange zone - but haven't convinced myself that it would work as yet.

Also I have the idea that the intersection in the centre of the square could be mounted by some kind of spire or other architectural feature that is accessed from the supporting pillars at each of the four cardinal points (NE, SE, SW & NW) around the intersection (the red crosshatches and the green blobs). Perhaps even providing a pedestrian overpass to the tram stop?

Additionally certain buildings around the perimeter would be allowed to 'invade' the square to small degrees. An example might be an extension of the Central Markets Arcade or if the Law Courts become a shopping centre an extension of their entry to accommodate outdoor cafés etc. Perhaps a low rise cultural building of some sort could be constructed in a corner for whatever purposes can be thought of.

The green areas would be landscaped in such a way that would facilitate the best balance between the daily functions and the special events functions.

Here's a really rough sketch I made with crayons in my lunch break weeks ago... *shame* :oops:
Image

I stress it's a really rough sketch, I was just jotting down the idea before I forgot it. And it's a really rough outline of where I was going with this before I changed jobs and lost my life. ;) Do with it what you will.
But that's best discussed in the Visions thread...
http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... &start=240
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Matt
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1125
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: London

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#402 Post by Matt » Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:03 pm

Prince George wrote:The council's website now has the "Guiding principles and vision" for Victoria Square up.

http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/scri ... =PC_151184
Wow... this is a step in the right direction.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#403 Post by Wayno » Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:39 pm

Prince George wrote:The council's website now has the "Guiding principles and vision" for Victoria Square up.

http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/scri ... =PC_151184
a few key sentences in the doc:
* Residential Population: The Square will greatly benefit from a significant increase in residential population overlooking the Square and in the immediate area. Strategic mixed-use residential projects within the surrounding precinct will be encouraged
* Aboriginal culture: The design solution for Victoria Square/Tarndanyangga will foster strong links with Aboriginal culture
* Accessibility: Victoria Square/Tarndanyangga will be a predominantly pedestrian space, connected to its built edges
* Events: Attractions may include cafes, markets, an adaptable stage for performance art, a large screen, exercise zones and other areas to make the Square one of Adelaide’s premier outdoor venues
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#404 Post by AtD » Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:50 pm

Thanks for your Executive Summary! :)

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

[COM] Re: Victoria Square

#405 Post by Omicron » Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:07 pm

Wayno wrote:
Prince George wrote:The council's website now has the "Guiding principles and vision" for Victoria Square up.

http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/scri ... =PC_151184
a few key sentences in the doc:
* Residential Population: The Square will greatly benefit from a significant increase in residential population overlooking the Square and in the immediate area. Strategic mixed-use residential projects within the surrounding precinct will be encouraged
Now that sounds like a call for increased height limits in the VIctoria Square zone if ever I heard one! No more of that dreadful Merc on Gouger malarkey, either - the fewer soulless shoeboxes with idle rectangular protrusions the better.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests