News & Discussion: General CBD Development

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7574
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#391 Post by Ben » Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:16 pm

Ben wrote:This could potentially be great news. Will have to wait a bit longer to find out the dollar value to determine how significant an upgrade this is:
Type: Development Application Received
Application Number: DA/98/2009
Lodgement Date: 5/02/2009
Location: Stamford Plaza Adelaide, 150 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000
Description: Internal and external alterations including signage.
The estimated value is only $550,000 so i would assume the facade will not be getting a make over, which is dissapointing, however maybe it is a cheap upgrade.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#392 Post by Omicron » Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:16 am

Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:This could potentially be great news. Will have to wait a bit longer to find out the dollar value to determine how significant an upgrade this is:
Type: Development Application Received
Application Number: DA/98/2009
Lodgement Date: 5/02/2009
Location: Stamford Plaza Adelaide, 150 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000
Description: Internal and external alterations including signage.
The estimated value is only $550,000 so i would assume the facade will not be getting a make over, which is dissapointing, however maybe it is a cheap upgrade.
If it's that cheap, think new window shades and new light-bulbs for the sign up top.

User avatar
Tyler_Durden
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#393 Post by Tyler_Durden » Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:19 pm

Will wrote:Sorry for going off topic but why the F#*% does every article written in the eastern states have to refer to us as the 'city of churches'!? :evil:

Every time this moniker is used tremendous damage is done to our image. There are times when I wish Mike Rann would do a Stalin.
What rubbish.

It is a huge part of Adelaide's history and Adelaide's tolerance of different churches and receiving of immigrants of different religions is part of what has made Adelaide what it is today. Why shouldn't we embrace our history?
Düsseldorfer wrote:hah churches, where? we've got probably 1 "small" cathedral and it just happens to be in a lot of the pics of our skyline...

the city of Cologne is more of a city of church, and its got one of the worlds largest cathedrals:
It's funny you mention a German city, when it was the persecution of Germans in their homeland due to their religious beliefs that led to so many moving to Adelaide in the 1800s. Many of Adelaide's searly settlers were so-called "Religious Refugees". And because of those Germans, in particular, the Barossa Valley is now what it is, to give just one example of their contributions.

I don't think you have any understanding at all of why Adelaide is known as the City of Churches. It is not referring to the number of Church buidlings. It never has been.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5864
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#394 Post by Will » Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:43 pm

Tyler_Durden wrote:
Will wrote:Sorry for going off topic but why the F#*% does every article written in the eastern states have to refer to us as the 'city of churches'!? :evil:

Every time this moniker is used tremendous damage is done to our image. There are times when I wish Mike Rann would do a Stalin.
What rubbish.

It is a huge part of Adelaide's history and Adelaide's tolerance of different churches and receiving of immigrants of different religions is part of what has made Adelaide what it is today. Why shouldn't we embrace our history?
Düsseldorfer wrote:hah churches, where? we've got probably 1 "small" cathedral and it just happens to be in a lot of the pics of our skyline...

the city of Cologne is more of a city of church, and its got one of the worlds largest cathedrals:
It's funny you mention a German city, when it was the persecution of Germans in their homeland due to their religious beliefs that led to so many moving to Adelaide in the 1800s. Many of Adelaide's searly settlers were so-called "Religious Refugees". And because of those Germans, in particular, the Barossa Valley is now what it is, to give just one example of their contributions.

I don't think you have any understanding at all of why Adelaide is known as the City of Churches. It is not referring to the number of Church buidlings. It never has been.
Trust me, I completely understand why Adelaide is called the City of Churches. However we live in a country where there is a sizeable percentage of the population which has no idea why we celebrate Australia Day. As such, how many people out there do you think know that we got the moniker because our state was established as a haven of religious tolerance? Not many I presume. If the majority of the population knew why we got that moniker I would have no problem with it. However in reality people think that we are the city of churches because we are such a boring place that going to church is all there is to do. But in addition, ask the average person out there to name the words that come to mind when they think of churches, I am confident that the majority would not be positive.

User avatar
thechap
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:53 am

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#395 Post by thechap » Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:41 pm

Will wrote: If the majority of the population knew why we got that moniker I would have no problem with it. However in reality people think that we are the city of churches because we are such a boring place that going to church is all there is to do.


Do you really think Australians are that stupid?

Will, most people understand why we are called the city of churches. And why is there anything that wrong with being called the city of churches? It is immature and naieve of you to suggest that we may be thought less of by other states / countries if this is our moniker. SA is also called the festival state and as far as I can tell we don't have that many more festivals than other states these days, but I don't see you getting all riled up about that label. You obviously have some personal insecurities to do with christianity, but it's not fair to suggest that we lose part of our history for it mate. Besides, I think its an apt name - out in greater adelaide, there is a church every few blocks, they're everywhere!
"The Beauty of Grace is that it makes life not fair." - Relient K

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#396 Post by Wayno » Tue Feb 17, 2009 5:14 pm

thechap wrote:
Will wrote: If the majority of the population knew why we got that moniker I would have no problem with it. However in reality people think that we are the city of churches because we are such a boring place that going to church is all there is to do.


Do you really think Australians are that stupid?
I don't think they are that stupid - but Will has a point. I'm sure the notion of Adelaide being a place "chocka full of churches" conjours up all sorts of wierdo thoughts in the minds of those who have never visited SA...

But we are off topic...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#397 Post by crawf » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:13 pm

I don't know many people who know why we used to be called the 'City of Churches, many people just think its because the city has more churches per captia when infact that is incorrect.

User avatar
Mants
Legendary Member!
Posts: 987
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:40 am
Location: City of Burnside

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#398 Post by Mants » Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:56 pm

i don't know many people who care.

next please.

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#399 Post by Prince George » Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:40 am

It's a shame they don't mean the shoes, although the "City of Church's" would have to be Northampton. Perhaps we could be the "City of John Lobb, Bootmaker"?

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5864
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#400 Post by Will » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:53 am

thechap wrote:
Will wrote: If the majority of the population knew why we got that moniker I would have no problem with it. However in reality people think that we are the city of churches because we are such a boring place that going to church is all there is to do.


Do you really think Australians are that stupid?

Will, most people understand why we are called the city of churches. And why is there anything that wrong with being called the city of churches? It is immature and naieve of you to suggest that we may be thought less of by other states / countries if this is our moniker. SA is also called the festival state and as far as I can tell we don't have that many more festivals than other states these days, but I don't see you getting all riled up about that label. You obviously have some personal insecurities to do with christianity, but it's not fair to suggest that we lose part of our history for it mate. Besides, I think its an apt name - out in greater adelaide, there is a church every few blocks, they're everywhere!
Wayno is right in saying that this discussion is off topic. Let us continue it where it belongs:

http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... &start=510

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: General CBD Development

#401 Post by AtD » Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:05 pm

Ben wrote:Nearly had a heart attack when I read "construct 5 level building on King William st", however luckily it is King William Rd North Adelaide. I'm not sure exactly where this is though... somewhere in the parklands ;)
Type: Development Application Received
Application Number: DA/473/2008
Lodgement Date: 23/06/2008
Location: 53-79 King William Road, NORTH ADELAIDE SA 5006
Description: Construct 5 level residential building with basement car parking on vacant land.
Any further news on this one? Posted June last year.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7574
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: General CBD Development

#402 Post by Ben » Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:31 pm

AtD wrote:
Ben wrote:Nearly had a heart attack when I read "construct 5 level building on King William st", however luckily it is King William Rd North Adelaide. I'm not sure exactly where this is though... somewhere in the parklands ;)
Type: Development Application Received
Application Number: DA/473/2008
Lodgement Date: 23/06/2008
Location: 53-79 King William Road, NORTH ADELAIDE SA 5006
Description: Construct 5 level residential building with basement car parking on vacant land.
Any further news on this one? Posted June last year.
Yes this one is on hold as of August last year.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#403 Post by AtD » Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:52 am

Today's AFR Property section opens with the headline “GDI sees gold in Adelaide office block.” I don't think I've ever seen Adelaide grab the lead story in the AFR before! Sydney based GDI Property is in due diligence to acquire the Grenfell Centre for $80 million, a yield of 9%. The building is 25,200sqm and is rented at an average of $291/sqm. “Comparable buildings in Adelaide have attracted more than $400/sqm”

Adelarch
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:34 pm

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#404 Post by Adelarch » Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:13 pm

interesting read, hopefully proves true!


Adelaide demand holds up
SARAH MARTIN, Adelaide Now
March 10, 2009 12:30am

BUSINESS forecaster BIS Shrapnel says Adelaide's apartment market will remain resilient in 2009, despite a grim picture emerging in other capital cities.

BIS Shrapnel senior economist Jason Anderson said Adelaide would be less affected by the credit constraints causing large numbers of apartment deferrals in Sydney and Brisbane, and to a lesser extent in Melbourne.

Figures from the company showed the construction of 16,623 apartments and townhouses had been abandoned or deferred in these three eastern state markets in the year to January 2009.

He said the figures included projects that were yet to be approved.

Mr Anderson said Adelaide's market fundamentals were different and large numbers of deferrals were unlikely.

"In a market like Adelaide you have got a small number of projects that will make or break activity and if it hasn't happened by now than I don't think it will," he said.

Mr Anderson said demand had held up in Adelaide and pre-sale figures remained strong. "I think the demand side will pick up substantially this year, particularly if the first homebuyers grant is extended," he said.

Hines Property, developer of the $70 million Conservatory on Hindmarsh project and 20 Hindmarsh Square, said strong owner-occupier demand had led to increased sales and rising median apartment prices.

Hines Property director James Hines said 53 apartments in the Conservatory would be settled in June at an average price of $703,000.

He attributed up-market owner-occupiers for driving the sector which was traditionally dominated by student housing and investors.

"Very high levels of pre-construction commitment for both projects . . . demonstrates the depth of demand for similar quality projects," he said.

Mr Hines said he was confident demand in the apartment sector would remain high because of Adelaide's low residential vacancy rate, low interest rates and strong defence, mining and education sectors.

Ben
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7574
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Adelaide

Re: [] CBD Development: General

#405 Post by Ben » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:05 pm

This was initially approved in April last year. it appears they are pressing ahead. I'm not sure of what the plans involve.
DA/125/2008/A
11/03/2009
Development Application Received
Variation to previous authorisation - Internal and external alterations to existing retail building with six (6) new tenancies at ground floor, facade upgrade and signage - VARIATION - Erect illuminated Blade sign to canopy along with signage to central metal clad column facing Rundle Mall WOOLWORTHS, 78-88 Rundle Mall, ADELAIDE SA 5000

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 8 guests